tailgater wrote:28.9 seconds.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/05/05/were-parents-we-do-know-better-dad-angry-after-hes-told-his-picky-eater-daughter-can-only-eat-center-provided-lunches/
Florida.
During Obama administration.
Cites "federal" rules.
You didn't read the entire article, did you?
Quote:
"After WOFL-TV dug deeper into the packed lunch ban, it found out that the state’s Department of Children and Families did conduct a routine inspection of lunches in April, but it didn’t note any issues in the meals brought by parents.
Kristi Gray, a spokeswoman for the DCF, told WOFL that nutrition of homemade lunches isn’t something it considers in its inspections."
“This agency does not require that facilities provide oversight of what parents pack for their children to eat. There would not be fines or citations issued as a result of the contents of a child’s lunch box.”
"“Shoot me, I really wanted to provide healthy meals,” Kathryn Sutherin, who owns the facility with her husband, told the news station, rolling her eyes in surprise to some of the parents’ backlash to the letter"
The woman just did it by fiat, randomly referencing an inspection as the reason. The inspection wasn't even looking at what she claimed they were looking at.
tail wrote:
And before your panties go all puffy,
I didn't know that not jumping all in THREE TIMES IN A ROW after patently false articles constituted getting one's panties puffy. You do realize, that if the 4th or 5th time (or whatever you're on now) you successfully dig something up, you've lost anyway. You've proven that people immediately believe the headline of anything they think is in line with their version of the truth. It's so bad that in half of these, the article actually contains information to the contrary, and you've still tried citing them.
Quote:
the federal "child care food program" is influenced (like every other school lunch program) by the actions that the first lady set into motion.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2014/0808/Back-to-school-No-snacks-for-you-Michelle-Obama-says
too bad the child care food program didn't actually influence that decision, per the quote from the woman running it.
Quote:
I think Moochelle is despicable.
I don't really need these types of facts to prove it. But you're so keen on defending her that I thought it would be fun.
You can think she's as despicable as you want. You're doing a piss poor job of proving that this particular cause of hers has done anything though.