America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by HockeyDad. 194 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
Oath Keepers in Ferguson MO.
tonygraz Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,262
In my state you need a permit to carry and the gun must not be visible.
SmokeMonkey Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
TMCTLT wrote:
WHY???? what is SO scary? Are you also startled when you see LEO's with their sidearm? Do you also find it startling to cross the street where 2 ton automobiles " could " run you over? I guess I don't understand the fear that law abiding open carry folks create...


So I shouldn't have any apprehension over the guy next to me filling his car up with a loaded AK-47? I find that odd.
It's not the gun, it's what's wrong with the guy walkimg around with an assault rifle where there's no need.

Please keep in mind that I have never lived outside the South and am quite familiar with firearms. Not problem with concealed carry, no problems with people carrying due to their job. I've shot a wide array of firearms, been through gun safety, etc.

But even in the reddest of red states, Alabama, I've never seen a guy walk down the street with a visible automatic weapon who didn't have a badge or an obvious military uniform. If that happens all the time in Indiana, well...
SmokeMonkey Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
Abrignac wrote:
That shouldn't come as no surprise. There's nothing strange at all regarding one's apprehension as it relates to things which they are unfamiliar with.


Again, not apprehensice of firearms, apprehensive of someone strolling down my street with a visible and loaded assault rifle. Unless there's a zombie apocalypse, then game on.Herfing
gummy jones Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
SmokeMonkey wrote:
So I shouldn't have any apprehension over the guy next to me filling his car up with a loaded AK-47? I find that odd.
It's not the gun, it's what's wrong with the guy walkimg around with an assault rifle where there's no need.

Please keep in mind that I have never lived outside the South and am quite familiar with firearms. Not problem with concealed carry, no problems with people carrying due to their job. I've shot a wide array of firearms, been through gun safety, etc.

But even in the reddest of red states, Alabama, I've never seen a guy walk down the street with a visible automatic weapon who didn't have a badge or an obvious military uniform. If that happens all the time in Indiana, well...


Your quote said "even a handgun"
SmokeMonkey Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
gummy jones wrote:
Your quote said "even a handgun"


I'm not sure I've seen a guy walking down the street with a visible holstered weapon, but it's probable I have and took no notice. The crux of the later posts, and even that first one, was more the assault weapons. Sorry, could have been clearer or not muddies the water from the start.
SmokeMonkey Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
But even that one mentioned, more than once, assault weapons.
gummy jones Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
SmokeMonkey wrote:
I'm not sure I've seen a guy walking down the street with a visible holstered weapon, but it's probable I have and took no notice. The crux of the later posts, and even that first one, was more the assault weapons. Sorry, could have been clearer or not muddies the water from the start.


I guess it depends on where you live

It is pretty commonplace in the Pittsburgh area

Not me personally (at least not usually) but I like to see it

Makes me feel just a touch safer
wheelrite Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Guns don't kill people, STDs do

wheel,,
victor809 Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
gummy jones wrote:
I guess it depends on where you live

It is pretty commonplace in the Pittsburgh area

Not me personally (at least not usually) but I like to see it

Makes me feel just a touch safer


I don't think we should restrict people's ability to carry weapons, but to say it makes you feel safer seems odd.

Unless you know the person carrying a weapon, you have no idea what they may or may not do with it, nor do you know the skill and capability with which they'd wield said weapon.

Just because someone is carrying a gun doesn't mean they have your best interests in mind.
namadio Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
The oath of the goat
gummy jones Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
victor809 wrote:
I don't think we should restrict people's ability to carry weapons, but to say it makes you feel safer seems odd.

Unless you know the person carrying a weapon, you have no idea what they may or may not do with it, nor do you know the skill and capability with which they'd wield said weapon.

Just because someone is carrying a gun doesn't mean they have your best interests in mind.


I carry concealed daily. I'm not proud of it or embarrassed by it - I simply have too much to lose in a sea of people who put no value on human life.

In all my years living in cities I have never seen a gang banger tatted up thug with a nice leather holster and a 1911 cocked and locked. If your experience is different pray tell.

Open carriers aren't here to play hero and save the world. They exercise their rights and, Heaven forbid, should the ish hit the fan, it is nice to op know someone else around me at least has the equipment needed to react with deadly force. Regardless of their "skills and capabilities," I'll take a 1% chance of survival over a 0% chance any day.

Average 911 response time ~12m
Underwood 9mm 147gr +p xtp >1125 fps
8trackdisco Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,081
Speyside wrote:
Doubt it, do you think paramilitary patrolling Ferguson is a good idea?


Let's see how it goes.

Them NOT being there has rendered one result.

At the very least, it will be interesting.
victor809 Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
gummy jones wrote:
I carry concealed daily. I'm not proud of it or embarrassed by it - I simply have too much to lose in a sea of people who put no value on human life.

In all my years living in cities I have never seen a gang banger tatted up thug with a nice leather holster and a 1911 cocked and locked. If your experience is different pray tell.

Open carriers aren't here to play hero and save the world. They exercise their rights and, Heaven forbid, should the ish hit the fan, it is nice to op know someone else around me at least has the equipment needed to react with deadly force. Regardless of their "skills and capabilities," I'll take a 1% chance of survival over a 0% chance any day.

Average 911 response time ~12m
Underwood 9mm 147gr +p xtp >1125 fps


I'm not talking about you open carrying yourself. Get on with your bad self.

One doesn't need to be a "tatted up thug" to be a threat. People with nice leather holsters can decide to shoot you as well. Or, people with nice leather holsters can decide the "tatted up thug" behind you is a threat and may not be the best shot.

You have zero guarantee of capability from other gun owners. To feel safer around them just because they have the type of equipment you think means they have the same view of the world as you... that seems short sighted.

Don't get me wrong, if someone is sitting around with a gun in a holster, I don't feel particularly unsafe. I just don't see that as a mark of additional safety. I don't trust them to resolve a situation to my benefit any more than an unarmed person would.
gummy jones Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
victor809 wrote:
I'm not talking about you open carrying yourself. Get on with your bad self.

One doesn't need to be a "tatted up thug" to be a threat. People with nice leather holsters can decide to shoot you as well. Or, people with nice leather holsters can decide the "tatted up thug" behind you is a threat and may not be the best shot.

You have zero guarantee of capability from other gun owners. To feel safer around them just because they have the type of equipment you think means they have the same view of the world as you... that seems short sighted.

Don't get me wrong, if someone is sitting around with a gun in a holster, I don't feel particularly unsafe. I just don't see that as a mark of additional safety. I don't trust them to resolve a situation to my benefit any more than an unarmed person would.


Anyone can be a threat but stats are stats. Young black males commit a disproportionate amount of violent crimes, especially compared to moms driving mini vans. If someone means you harm would you rather know the extent of their potential or be surprised while your throat gets slit? If you not seeing a bad guys gun makes you feel safer then that's your prerogative.

Once again, I know a lot of guys (a lot) who open carry daily and all of them are proficient enough that I would rather have them in the same room with me rather than two blocks away. Further, the fact that they are open carrying shows they support at least part of my world view. Either way, I like to know my surroundings the best I can and if they have evil intentions at least I have an idea what they are working with.

If someone shoots up my movie theatre I pray someone else has a sidearm and an ounce of courage, regardless of any guarantee of their capability.
gummy jones Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
victor809 wrote:
I'm not talking about you open carrying yourself. Get on with your bad self.

One doesn't need to be a "tatted up thug" to be a threat. People with nice leather holsters can decide to shoot you as well. Or, people with nice leather holsters can decide the "tatted up thug" behind you is a threat and may not be the best shot.

You have zero guarantee of capability from other gun owners. To feel safer around them just because they have the type of equipment you think means they have the same view of the world as you... that seems short sighted.

Don't get me wrong, if someone is sitting around with a gun in a holster, I don't feel particularly unsafe. I just don't see that as a mark of additional safety. I don't trust them to resolve a situation to my benefit any more than an unarmed person would.


One last thing

Your Wild West scenario in the opening of your statement simply doesn't play out in real life

At least not with any statistical significance, regardless of its popularities on blogs and in movies
wheelrite Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
All the civilized people should abandon Ferguson to the undesireables and then build a wall. A monorail could be built surrounding the Zoo , an exhibit could be established and tickets sold.
Kinda like going to an alligator Farm in Florida,

easy peasey...


wheel,,
gummy jones Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
wheelrite wrote:
All the civilized people should abandon Ferguson to the undesireables and then build a wall. A monorail could be built surrounding the Zoo , an exhibit could be established and tickets sold.
Kinda like going to an alligator Farm in Florida,

easy peasey...


wheel,,


Can we feed them if we pay extra?
victor809 Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
gummy jones wrote:
One last thing

Your Wild West scenario in the opening of your statement simply doesn't play out in real life

At least not with any statistical significance, regardless of its popularities on blogs and in movies


None of ANY of this occurs with any high percentage.

An average person isn't likely to ever be involved in a gun related violent crime in their entire life. Yet every civilian carrying a weapon is doing so with the intent of defending themselves in a situation they are likely to have never been in before.

I simply do not trust an average person's ability to correctly assess threats, and/or to keep their sh%t together when under stress. I don't even really trust an average person to correctly understand when they should or should not be stressed.

Your movie theater scenario is the perfect example of a situation where I'm just as likely to get shot by some dumb-azz than the shooter themselves. I don't trust an amateur handgun enthusiast in the dark, under stress.
DrafterX Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
I've had a gun pointed at me three times.... 2 times by cops tho... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
I've had a gun pointed at me three times.... 2 times by cops tho... Mellow


Did you eat their donuts?
gummy jones Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
victor809 wrote:
None of ANY of this occurs with any high percentage.

An average person isn't likely to ever be involved in a gun related violent crime in their entire life. Yet every civilian carrying a weapon is doing so with the intent of defending themselves in a situation they are likely to have never been in before.

I simply do not trust an average person's ability to correctly assess threats, and/or to keep their sh%t together when under stress. I don't even really trust an average person to correctly understand when they should or should not be stressed.

Your movie theater scenario is the perfect example of a situation where I'm just as likely to get shot by some dumb-azz than the shooter themselves. I don't trust an amateur handgun enthusiast in the dark, under stress.



I think movie theatre shooting statistics blow your claim out of the water. Once again, Wild West scenarios aside (and this is the last time I'll say it as the kids are in bed and I'm tired), when and evil person sets out to murder me I'll take my chances with and amateur enthusiast trying to fight back vs the scenario you seem to portray as less dangerous where your brains are splattered in the floor.

No one will make you carry a gun so don't worry about it too much. But I can assure you you have been around them way more than you think and I can only assume that every instance has involved someone correctly assessing the threats or lack thereof and keeping their **** together. You just didn't know it.
DrafterX Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
victor809 wrote:
Did you eat their donuts?



no... just thought my car was faster... d'oh!
gummy jones Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
DrafterX wrote:
no... just thought my car was faster... d'oh!


If you're not first your last
DrafterX Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
actually I finished in the middle of da pack.... Mellow
gummy jones Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Hilarious

Night
victor809 Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
gummy jones wrote:

No one will make you carry a gun so don't worry about it too much. But I can assure you you have been around them way more than you think and I can only assume that every instance has involved someone correctly assessing the threats or lack thereof and keeping their **** together. You just didn't know it.


Oh I'm sure that I've been around guns when people have correctly chosen not to pull them. And I don't worry about my own carrying or not carrying of a gun. My entire point is that a gun in another person's hand does nothing to make me feel safer in the moment. Granted, there aren't moments where I really feel unsafe.... so there's no real way for me to feel safer.
jetblasted Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
"The most polite company, is a room full of armed men." - Eliza Frances Andrews, 1865
DrafterX Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Quiet in Ferguson last night..... I didn't know there was 35,000 of them Oath Keeper dudes... Think
teedubbya Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
#77 jet didn't she also extol the virtues of the KKK and embrace/celebrate their efforts for keeping the uppity negros in their place?
gummy jones Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
teedubbya wrote:
#77 jet didn't she also extol the virtues of the KKK and embrace/celebrate their efforts for keeping the uppity negros in their place?


margaret sangers mentor i suppose
teedubbya Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
She was also a self proclaimed socialist. The quote is interesting though given the carnage of the Wild West.
DrafterX Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Well I'm packing up my game and I'm a head out west..
Where real women come equipped with scripts and fake breasts... :-"
gummy jones Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
teedubbya wrote:
She was also a self proclaimed socialist. The quote is interesting though given the carnage of the Wild West.


while i cannot comment on the carnage or lackthereof in the wild west

i wonder if it were due to guns or due to the fact that it had no shortage of degenerates and criminals
teedubbya Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I think it was just independent spirit and had little to do with guns. It's still there if you look just in different form.

teedubbya Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
But you must admit guns were everywhere and good behavior often was not there seems to be no correlation either way despite what the bigoted socialist claimed.
DrafterX Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Wyatt Earp..?? Huh
TMCTLT Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
SmokeMonkey wrote:
So I shouldn't have any apprehension over the guy next to me filling his car up with a loaded AK-47? I find that odd.
It's not the gun, it's what's wrong with the guy walkimg around with an assault rifle where there's no need.

Please keep in mind that I have never lived outside the South and am quite familiar with firearms. Not problem with concealed carry, no problems with people carrying due to their job. I've shot a wide array of firearms, been through gun safety, etc.

But even in the reddest of red states, Alabama, I've never seen a guy walk down the street with a visible automatic weapon who didn't have a badge or an obvious military uniform. If that happens all the time in Indiana, well...



Of course it does not happen here AND it did not happen there!!!! You chose to take it out of context from some law abiding citizens giving safe cover for a reporter who'd been there before and knew how dangerous it was to be there to a guy pumping gas next to you....d'oh!
SmokeMonkey Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
TMCTLT wrote:
Of course it does not happen here AND it did not happen there!!!! You chose to take it out of context from some law abiding citizens giving safe cover for a reporter who'd been here before and knew how dangerous it was to be there to a guy pumping gas next to you....d'oh!


If you'll notice, whilenmy questio was asked under this thread, it was a general question about the open carry laws for assault weapons - not limited to the context of this instance. I, quite literally, have never seen someone in the US just carrying one around. You chose to put my question in the context that would best suit how you would like to respond. d'oh!

There's really no reason to get frustrated over it.

Apologies for the weird spelling, etc. My phone doesn't play well with this forum.
Abrignac Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
From my posts, I don't think anyone could make the case that I am nothing if not against gun laws. With that said, I'm humored by the arguments of the open carry crowd. Theater shooting statistics? If one were to compile such stats, I'm sure the only way the % of movie goers shot to the % of all movie goers would even register is if one carried the results to at least 6 significant digits.

As for a cocked and locked 1911 being open carried in a nice leather holster, that's a nostalgic show piece. But in my opinion, not the most practical option. I'd rather have my ugly black Glock 23 with a 14 rounds than an 8 shot. As far as the leather holster is concerned, they are nice to look at, but I like my ugly black Kydex holster as it's much smoother to draw from. I don't really care how it looks, I'm not trying to impress anyone. In fact I wear my shirts a little loose so the cover my firearm nicely without showing a bulge.

As far as accuracy is concerned, I had the pleasure to shoot with some of them. A few that I shot with were impressive. One or two out shot me. Some were decent shooters who could put all of their rounds inside at least the outside ring of a standard target , but their groups were not real desirable. Some even missed the entire target more times than they hit it. But, what I found most troubling was that the better the shooter, the more refrained their talk of open carry. It was the poorest of shooters that talked the loudest of their God given right to open carry.

Of course your results may be different than mine.
Abrignac Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
SmokeMonkey wrote:
If you'll notice, whilenmy questio was asked under this thread, it was a general question about the open carry laws for assault weapons - not limited to the context of this instance. I, quite literally, have never seen someone in the US just carrying one around. You chose to put my question in the context that would best suit how you would like to respond. d'oh!

There's really no reason to get frustrated over it.

Apologies for the weird spelling, etc. My phone doesn't play well with this forum.


Forget about it Smokie. You will find some people will take any hint of disagreement and use that to assume you are completely against them.
DrafterX Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
If I get shot in a theater I'm going straight to the store to buy a lotto ticket... Beer
jetblasted Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
Re: 79,

No, not at all. She did show deep concern when union troops used her servants to staff the brothel they had set-up in her front yard, though.
DrafterX Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
WHAT DOES IT MATTER..!! Mad
teedubbya Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
jetblasted wrote:
Re: 79,

No, not at all. She did show deep concern when union troops used her servants to staff the brothel they had set-up in her front yard, though.



It was a rhetorical question......... she was a self proclaimed socialist and supported the KKK supremacy and segregation efforts

Meh it isn't shocking or suprising given the time frame in the south following the burning of food stores and stuff

TMCTLT Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Abrignac wrote:
Forget about it Smokie. You will find some people will take any hint of disagreement and use that to assume you are completely against them.



And you assume way too much...d'oh!

Go back and re-read his comparison ( a guy with an AK47 next to him @ the filling station ) to these guys giving a reporter cover in Ferguson, get over your yourself already.
MACS Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,791
TMCTLT wrote:
WHY???? what is SO scary? Are you also startled when you see LEO's with their sidearm? Do you also find it startling to cross the street where 2 ton automobiles " could " run you over? I guess I don't understand the fear that law abiding open carry folks create...


Wait... are you telling me with all the theater shootings, and other crazy sh*t going on, that seeing dudes walking around with assault rifles doesn't raise red flags with you?

It would with me, and I can carry concealed, legally. I'd be outgunned, and likely to find my way out of there in a hurry.
banderl Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
jetblasted wrote:
Re: 79,

No, not at all. She did show deep concern when union troops used her servants to staff the brothel they had set-up in her front yard, though.



Why didn't they use her to staff the brothel? Was she butt ugly?
victor809 Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
banderl wrote:
Why didn't they use her to staff the brothel? Was she butt ugly?


^fair question...
TMCTLT Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
MACS wrote:
Wait... are you telling me with all the theater shootings, and other crazy sh*t going on, that seeing dudes walking around with assault rifles doesn't raise red flags with you?

It would with me, and I can carry concealed, legally. I'd be outgunned, and likely to find my way out of there in a hurry.




No you wait, are you telling me that because some F'n mental cases shot up theaters and " other crazy **** " that we should LUMP them in with these guys giving a reporter cover in a very volatile situation????? Did they shoot anyone? NO!!!!! I also carry legally Shaun and yes we'd both be " outgunned " there's a huge difference in sick people shooting up theaters and this case sorry.
SmokeMonkey Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
TMCTLT wrote:
And you assume way too much...d'oh!

Go back and re-read his comparison ( a guy with an AK47 next to him @ the filling station ) to these guys giving a reporter cover in Ferguson, get over your yourself already.


I'm not sure how much more clear I can be. I asked a question only related to laws regarding open carry of assault rifles. I specifically did not address the Ferguson issue. I never made a comparison anywhere.

You are arguing a comparison that isn't there, I think because you wanted it to be there.

I even went back through my posts to see where you might have thought I compared the two. I missed it, but if you find it, please point it out. It's entirely possible I skimmed over it or I read somethung differently than you.

I'm really not sure why this has bent you out of shape so much
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>