America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by tonygraz. 185 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
Obama gun control order: Here are 8 main provisions
tailgater Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
tonygraz wrote:
Hey - Tball is back ! Didn't miss you at all, and I don't think anyone did.


I missed you, Tony.

But only by a couple inches.

whip
Speyside Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
So Tony is now the Cbid ambassador speaking for all, I must have missed the memo. Welcome back Teddy.
Brewha Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
teddyballgame wrote:
Are these the same liberals that were responsible for fast and furious?
Arming drug runners in Mexico and responsible for 100s of Mexicans dying along with a U.S. border patrol agent.

Yes, thank you liberals for caring so much about gun control.

Guns are very risky, so why not arm some bad guys?

"Control" being the key word in the attempt to further control the law abiding populous.

An "assault" rifle is just a rifle. You pull the trigger and one bullet comes out. They may look like military style rifles, but they are not machine guns.

Good to see you back TBG!
Yes – liberals did make the Fast and Furious movie series. Guess they are good for something, huh?

Oh, and you’re welcome!
Brewha Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
gummy jones wrote:
only crazy when you consider that the main focus of these laws is an object (scary "military guns") that is almost nonexistent as a contributor to the "gun murder epidemic"

Well I suppose we agree it looks stupid.

But “the fool is the twin of the wise”.
And, no – I’m not suggesting that I have a resemblance to TBG…
DrafterX Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
"Daddy you're a fool to cry
You're a fool to cry
And it makes me wonder why"... Mellow
Brewha Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DrafterX wrote:
"Daddy you're a fool to cry
You're a fool to cry
And it makes me wonder why"... Mellow

I'm not your daddy....

just sayin'.
teddyballgame Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
Hope you guys all had a great Christmas and New Year's.

Brewha, I am sorry the sarcasm didn't come through on the "thanking the liberals for caring so much about gun control" statement.

I'll be sure to use the "sarcasm" emoji thingy next time we talk about the illegal gun running that the Obama admin performed for everyone's safety.

...wait for it....Sarcasm
tailgater Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
You guys are all awesome.
Sarcasm

Brewha Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
teddyballgame wrote:
Hope you guys all had a great Christmas and New Year's.

Brewha, I am sorry the sarcasm didn't come through on the "thanking the liberals for caring so much about gun control" statement.

I'll be sure to use the "sarcasm" emoji thingy next time we talk about the illegal gun running that the Obama admin performed for everyone's safety.

...wait for it....Sarcasm

Dang! Looks like you have out cleavered me again teddyballgame.

It is good that you start using the emojii. I think on this forum we are all learning that when it comes to sarcasm you have no equal.
Speyside Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Brewha, do you imply quantity or quality?
Brewha Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
Speyside wrote:
Brewha, do you imply quantity or quality?

Neither – simply “unmatched”.

Sort of like Haggis or Head Cheese. It stands apart.
Hopefully at a great distance......
frankj1 Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
Burner02 wrote:
What do you disagree with?


Homicides in the 90's decreased because of the war on drugs. More people were arrested and went to prison for longer periods of time. Also in the 90's Clinton poured a lot of money into Police Departments. More officers on the street, meant more officers for community policing. Police departments started a big push based upon the Broken Window theory. Take care of the small crimes, and the bigger crimes won't happen. People take pride in their neighborhood, when it looks nice and clean. Now the police are under attack for this, and neighborhoods are starting to look like **** again. Now they don't want the police to enforce small crimes, and bitch and moan when the big ones happen.



to be honest, it's not so much that anything above is wrong, just that I believe some is very right, and other factors are ignored...

for example:

the War on Drugs started over 20 years before the decline in the gun related murder rate, that's a tough one to believe deserves the bulk of the credit.

Increased police presence would be a big factor, though. I am pro-police, not pro-police state, but I seem to recall general safety improvements in the 90's, and general reinvestment in the "neighborhoods". Pride of ownership (even rentership) is a factor in neighborhoods too.

Not so inclined to believe that stopping small crime affects larger crime, but perhaps the poster has more info than I do as I seem to recall he is in Law Enforcement. I would believe that less crime in general lowers homicides as well, but I still feel the larger factor was more worthwhile employment.
tailgater Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Brewha wrote:
Neither – simply “unmatched”.

Sort of like Haggis or Head Cheese. It stands apart.
Hopefully at a great distance......


Is head cheese the crusty build up on TW's lips?


teddyballgame Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
Brewha wrote:
Neither – simply “unmatched”.

Sort of like Haggis or Head Cheese. It stands apart.
Hopefully at a great distance......



You underestimate the worth of the finer prepared haggises with a good scotch and a stogie.

You heathen!

I cannot speak to the head cheese preparations...but then it would be a step up from the guv'ment cheese that you are used to.
DrafterX Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
what's wrong with gubment cheese..?? Huh
MACS Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,881
DrafterX wrote:
what's wrong with gubment cheese..?? Huh


Makes the best grilled cheese sammiches.
DrafterX Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
I could sure use a chunk of gubment cheese about now... Mellow
tonygraz Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
Haggis is bad enough without preparing it with a stogie and scotch - ain't there enough strange things in it ? I don't think they have have gov't cheese any more Drafter, but it's nat cho cheese anyway.
tonygraz Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
Brewha wrote:
I'm not your daddy....

just sayin'.



DNA sample ?
Brewha Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
teddyballgame wrote:
You underestimate the worth of the finer prepared haggises with a good scotch and a stogie.


I did not think that was possible.....
Brewha Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
tonygraz wrote:
DNA sample ?

I'll send you some head cheese....
frankj1 Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
teddyballgame wrote:
You underestimate the worth of the finer prepared haggises with a good scotch and a stogie.

You heathen!

I cannot speak to the head cheese preparations...but then it would be a step up from the guv'ment cheese that you are used to.

did you forget the sarcasm thingy?
frankj1 Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
gummy jones wrote:
so you are suggesting an "assualt weapons" ban decreased the homicide rate?
we have no such ban currently yet "assault weapons" are used in a negligible amount of homicides

i would venture a guess and probably bet my house that historyically those scary scary guns that give our liberal politicians nightmares (except when some cali politicians are running them to make money on the side) have been involved in an incredibly insignificant percentage of firearm homicides. coincidence is what i chalk it up to, especially in the face of feel good laws.

admittedly I have not followed the history of gun ownership vs government very closely, (I am losing count how many times I have posted I do not want your guns) but I have no idea how or where assault weapon bans fit into anything I said.

I was under the impression that Clinton's role was in regard to drastically cutting back the licensed dealers in the mid 90's and commented that it coincided with the plunge in gun related deaths...plus a few other words unworthy of being pigeon- holed.
teddyballgame Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
frankj1 wrote:
did you forget the sarcasm thingy?



Yes I cannot just keep inserting emoji thingies all day long!

Not talking
Shame on you
Brick wall
tonygraz Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
Babies need lots of sleep.
Abrignac Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,358
frankj1 wrote:
Homicides in the 90's decreased because of the war on drugs. More people were arrested and went to prison for longer periods of time. Also in the 90's Clinton poured a lot of money into Police Departments. More officers on the street, meant more officers for community policing. Police departments started a big push based upon the Broken Window theory. Take care of the small crimes, and the bigger crimes won't happen. People take pride in their neighborhood, when it looks nice and clean. Now the police are under attack for this, and neighborhoods are starting to look like **** again. Now they don't want the police to enforce small crimes, and bitch and moan when the big ones happen.



to be honest, it's not so much that anything above is wrong, just that I believe some is very right, and other factors are ignored...

for example:

the War on Drugs started over 20 years before the decline in the gun related murder rate, that's a tough one to believe deserves the bulk of the credit.

Increased police presence would be a big factor, though. I am pro-police, not pro-police state, but I seem to recall general safety improvements in the 90's, and general reinvestment in the "neighborhoods". Pride of ownership (even rentership) is a factor in neighborhoods too.

Not so inclined to believe that stopping small crime affects larger crime, but perhaps the poster has more info than I do as I seem to recall he is in Law Enforcement. I would believe that less crime in general lowers homicides as well, but I still feel the larger factor was more worthwhile employment.


For the record, the 100,000 new police officers that Clinton supposedly put on streets was a big hoax. The federal government provided for a single year of salary. Afterwards, it was up to the individual municipalities to find money in their departmental budgets to keep them on after a year. Nothing but smoke and mirrors.

For what it's worth the homocide rate is tied most closely to illicit drug trade. If one were to look closer into the homocide rate they would realize that a large number of murders are a result of drug deals gone bad and attempts to rob drug dealers.

IIRC, they are way more suicides where firearms were the method of choice than actual gun related homocides. Making guns harder to get wont lower the rate of suicide. Great Britian has a suicide rate per capita about the same as the US. With guns hard to come by there it's no surprise that a rope is the method of choice across the pond.
frankj1 Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
So Anth, you disagree with the poster who listed the police increase under Clinton in the mid 90's as being a key factor in the decline of gun related deaths? Interesting.

Regarding your statement about the tie in with the drug trade, would you buy that there may be wide swings in those stats regionally? I ask because drug use, especially opioid related, around eastern Mass has been increasing at unprecedented epidemic rates. I assume southern New Hampshire as well. yet these two states are among the lowest in the country in gun related deaths. And I'm just guessing here but I'd wager in crime overall

They are also among the lowest in unemployment. Likely that this area also has more people placed in decent paying jobs . I lean toward that link.

Desperate times make desperate men.

One man's opinion.
tailgater Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:


Regarding your statement about the tie in with the drug trade, would you buy that there may be wide swings in those stats regionally? I ask because drug use, especially opioid related, around eastern Mass has been increasing at unprecedented epidemic rates. I assume southern New Hampshire as well. yet these two states are among the lowest in the country in gun related deaths. And I'm just guessing here but I'd wager in crime overall

They are also among the lowest in unemployment. Likely that this area also has more people placed in decent paying jobs . I lean toward that link.

Desperate times make desperate men.

One man's opinion.


I haven't seen the numbers to support this, but it seems to me that heroin use in Eastern MA and Cape Cod is centered around the Needle Exchange program sites.
Or should I say Needle "exchange", because no exchange is needed.

Am I the only one who isn't surprised that heroin use is highest near a free needle clinic?
Why be an addict out in Western MA, when you can mosey over to the Cape and get new needles, spoons, and the arm-stretchy rubber band thingy for free? Heck, they'll even provide instructions.
You know. For your safety.


DrafterX Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Obama-needles..?? Huh
gummy jones Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
frankj1 wrote:
admittedly I have not followed the history of gun ownership vs government very closely, (I am losing count how many times I have posted I do not want your guns) but I have no idea how or where assault weapon bans fit into anything I said.

I was under the impression that Clinton's role was in regard to drastically cutting back the licensed dealers in the mid 90's and commented that it coincided with the plunge in gun related deaths...plus a few other words unworthy of being pigeon- holed.


if you study it and, truthfully, knew the game in those days, then you would realize that most of the "dealers" back then were just guys who wanted to buy their guns wholesale without the mark up of the brick and mortars. i have quite a few friends who were. they were legal, normal, blue collar guys and some white collar dudes as well. the overwhelming majority of them were not actually selling anything (at least not with any frequency) to anyone, just continuing their hobby at a discount.

when the atf tightened their guidelines on who can be an ffl most of them stopped because...wait for it...they are/were law abiding citizens. so they sucked it up, spent an extra $50 when they wanted a gun at the corner gun shop rather than getting the discount through their own "business."

under clinton things didnt change much but it was harder to get an "assault rifle (semi automatic rifle that looks scary sometimes)," even though they have never, historically, been anywhere on the radar as a contributor to the homicide rate.

i sold a gun within this last year...abided by the law (although im sure an msnbc host would say i did so through some loophole or something) and was able to give a nice guy a good deal on a firearm i no longer enjoyed. if there were a simple way for me to do a background check and get a yes/no answer on a computer program that wouldnt also record the transaction illegally then i would have. if you make it easy for good people to do the right/safe thing then they usually will.
cacman Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
I just love hearing about how further gun control is good for me from a guy who has admittedly never owned a gun himself in his life. Has he even ever fired a gun???

It's just so fuq'n poetic…

Think I'm heading to the gun shop today to look at semi-auto's in .308. The M&P10 looks interesting as a starter for that platform.
gummy jones Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
cacman wrote:
I just love hearing about how further gun control is good for me from a guy who has admittedly never owned a gun himself in his life. Has he even ever fired a gun???

It's just so fuq'n poetic…

Think I'm heading to the gun shop today to look at semi-auto's in .308. The M&P10 looks interesting as a starter for that platform.


get the starter and ender in that platform
get the scar 17s...
frankj1 Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
tailgater wrote:
I haven't seen the numbers to support this, but it seems to me that heroin use in Eastern MA and Cape Cod is centered around the Needle Exchange program sites.
Or should I say Needle "exchange", because no exchange is needed.

Am I the only one who isn't surprised that heroin use is highest near a free needle clinic?
Why be an addict out in Western MA, when you can mosey over to the Cape and get new needles, spoons, and the arm-stretchy rubber band thingy for free? Heck, they'll even provide instructions.
You know. For your safety.



...but first comes the opioid addiction before the discovery of much cheaper heroin, if still alive!

And even that takes awhile as the users are denying their addictions while they are stealing first from their own family and then on the streets after they get thrown out of the house. $80 a hit gets expensive.

And eventually facing the reality of an addiction they had been denying as long as they were able to avoid sticking a needle in their arms.

I probably won't research it Joe, but is it possible that these free exchanges are located primarily in areas of lower employment? I assume you reference Hyannis when speaking of the Cape. The Western MA pockets are also low employment areas that were bypassed during recent booms and are still left with little hope for the future.

Ironically, the opioid epidemic itself is not prejudiced. Many well off towns are reporting rocketing usage stats, especially among high school aged kids. Those wealthy kids learn through the grapevine where to find the "programs" since none exist in their hometowns. They look just like the addicted poor kids, you'd never be able to tell the difference.

I guess it's a chicken egg/question...which came first? Heroin addiction or clinics?
Brewha Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DrafterX wrote:
Obama-needles..?? Huh

And I'm still waiting on my Obamaphone.....
tonygraz Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
One of my neighbors got an Obamaphone, you don't want to be that broke.
Brewha Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
I donno - I heard the iphone6+'s are really nice.

I still have my old 5s Bored
gummy jones Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
i knew a chick with an obama phone and the newest iphone

meanwhile my screen has been cracked for a couple years :(

#thestruggleisreal
tailgater Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
tonygraz wrote:
One of my neighbors got an Obamaphone, you don't want to be that broke.


To be your neighbor?
That IS broke...
teddyballgame Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
tailgater wrote:
To be your neighbor?
That IS broke...



Do you mean economically or morally broke?
teddyballgame Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
Anyone watch Der Leader on CNN Guns in America Townhall?

In the first 5 min the fantastic yarn spinner says this:

"There are neighborhoods around the country where it is easier for a 12 or 13 yr old to purchase a gun, and cheaper, than it is for them to get a book."

On what planet is this true?

This man is the biggest bold face liar ever to hold office.

How does he have any credibility whatsoever?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uje6JfIg9dM
DrafterX Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
sad part is people said 'amen'.... Mellow
tailgater Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teddyballgame wrote:
Do you mean economically or morally broke?


Yes.
Yes I do.

gummy jones Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
teddyballgame wrote:
Anyone watch Der Leader on CNN Guns in America Townhall?

In the first 5 min the fantastic yarn spinner says this:

"There are neighborhoods around the country where it is easier for a 12 or 13 yr old to purchase a gun, and cheaper, than it is for them to get a book."

On what planet is this true?

This man is the biggest bold face liar ever to hold office.

How does he have any credibility whatsoever?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uje6JfIg9dM


I didn't see it but certainly can't believe he said it
No one is that stupid
frankj1 Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
gummy jones wrote:
if you study it and, truthfully, knew the game in those days, then you would realize that most of the "dealers" back then were just guys who wanted to buy their guns wholesale without the mark up of the brick and mortars. i have quite a few friends who were. they were legal, normal, blue collar guys and some white collar dudes as well. the overwhelming majority of them were not actually selling anything (at least not with any frequency) to anyone, just continuing their hobby at a discount.

when the atf tightened their guidelines on who can be an ffl most of them stopped because...wait for it...they are/were law abiding citizens. so they sucked it up, spent an extra $50 when they wanted a gun at the corner gun shop rather than getting the discount through their own "business."

under clinton things didnt change much but it was harder to get an "assault rifle (semi automatic rifle that looks scary sometimes)," even though they have never, historically, been anywhere on the radar as a contributor to the homicide rate.

i sold a gun within this last year...abided by the law (although im sure an msnbc host would say i did so through some loophole or something) and was able to give a nice guy a good deal on a firearm i no longer enjoyed. if there were a simple way for me to do a background check and get a yes/no answer on a computer program that wouldnt also record the transaction illegally then i would have. if you make it easy for good people to do the right/safe thing then they usually will.

This is why I admitted to not really being up to speed, so thanks. Really. Until recently the term "assault rifle" conjured up an apparently totally wrong image in my mind, now I know.

Beyond that, upon reading this my comments are that most businesses that complain about difficulty with regulations/restrictions are businesses that are in it to actually do business in their respective industry, to make a living, provide a product and or service. They find the rules make that goal unreasonably difficult, and often have a legit gripe.

What you described though is "that most of the "dealers" back then were just guys who wanted to buy their guns wholesale without the mark up of the brick and mortars".

Clever, I have no doubt they are people of character, but a little bit of greed based deception was happening. Just buy at the same price as the guy carrying the B&M overhead! Who gets hurt...except the businessman.

Almost sounds like the businesses who really made a living by actually working in the gun selling industry were perhaps benefiting from the Clinton regulations, odd as that sounds.

I understand those that stopped were law abiding citizens, but based on the surface info I just absorbed, I do not think they were shafted so much as they were "beating the system" and were made to stop...ironically the government moves seemed to protect real retailers from guys looking to cut them out.

No attack intended GJ. I am really responding based on my reading comprehension skills so be easy on me!



cacman Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
gummy jones wrote:
get the starter and ender in that platform
get the scar 17s...

Ah yeah… After spending some time at the gun shop today I'm leaning towards the Daniel Defense DD5V1 in 7.62. Pretty fuq'n sweet piece of hardware. Now I just need to convince the wife this is what I need to replace an old 30-06 JC Higgins that I had restored.

The Glock 42 in .380 also looked pretty sweet for a concealed piece. And I am not a Glock fan, but it fit and balanced really well in my hand.

Holy crap it's been a long time since I bought a shotgun. When the fuq did they start background checks on buying a shotgun??? Shotguns use to be an over-the-counter purchase when I was a kid!!

Needless to say the American economy will benefit from my visit to the gun store today, and increased budget for immediate purchases.

S&W's stock has increased over 800% since Obama was elected to office compared to the 500% Apple stock has increased. May have to rethink future stock purchases too!
tonygraz Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
You might wanna wait awhile before buying stock- not sure guns are going to be so popular in the future.

What has me fooled is why people keep buying guns if they really think the Gov't is coming to get them.
teedubbya Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Because if you buy them before being forced to register them then they can't really come get them. If you wait.....
tonygraz Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
d'oh!
TMCTLT Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
tonygraz wrote:
You might wanna wait awhile before buying stock- not sure guns are going to be so popular in the future.

What has me fooled is why people keep buying guns if they really think the Gov't is coming to get them.




And you would be WRONG....very wrong.
cacman Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
tonygraz wrote:
You might wanna wait awhile before buying stock- not sure guns are going to be so popular in the future.

What has me fooled is why people keep buying guns if they really think the Gov't is coming to get them.

Wait for what??? The buck to pass me by???
I've been buying Apple stock for years. Even before the Big O was in office. Thanks to the Big O I'm considering buying stock in US arms stocks, as well as their products. I'm kicking myself for not buying their stocks earlier in his term.

But you go ahead believing in what the big "O" has to offer you, and investing tax payer dollars in companies like Chevy.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>