gummy jones wrote:if you study it and, truthfully, knew the game in those days, then you would realize that most of the "dealers" back then were just guys who wanted to buy their guns wholesale without the mark up of the brick and mortars. i have quite a few friends who were. they were legal, normal, blue collar guys and some white collar dudes as well. the overwhelming majority of them were not actually selling anything (at least not with any frequency) to anyone, just continuing their hobby at a discount.
when the atf tightened their guidelines on who can be an ffl most of them stopped because...wait for it...they are/were law abiding citizens. so they sucked it up, spent an extra $50 when they wanted a gun at the corner gun shop rather than getting the discount through their own "business."
under clinton things didnt change much but it was harder to get an "assault rifle (semi automatic rifle that looks scary sometimes)," even though they have never, historically, been anywhere on the radar as a contributor to the homicide rate.
i sold a gun within this last year...abided by the law (although im sure an msnbc host would say i did so through some loophole or something) and was able to give a nice guy a good deal on a firearm i no longer enjoyed. if there were a simple way for me to do a background check and get a yes/no answer on a computer program that wouldnt also record the transaction illegally then i would have. if you make it easy for good people to do the right/safe thing then they usually will.
This is why I admitted to not really being up to speed, so thanks. Really. Until recently the term "assault rifle" conjured up an apparently totally wrong image in my mind, now I know.
Beyond that, upon reading this my comments are that most businesses that complain about difficulty with regulations/restrictions are businesses that are in it to actually do business in their respective industry, to make a living, provide a product and or service. They find the rules make that goal unreasonably difficult, and often have a legit gripe.
What you described though is "that most of the "dealers" back then were just guys who wanted to buy their guns wholesale without the mark up of the brick and mortars".
Clever, I have no doubt they are people of character, but a little bit of greed based deception was happening. Just buy at the same price as the guy carrying the B&M overhead! Who gets hurt...except the businessman.
Almost sounds like the businesses who really made a living by actually working in the gun selling industry were perhaps benefiting from the Clinton regulations, odd as that sounds.
I understand those that stopped were law abiding citizens, but based on the surface info I just absorbed, I do not think they were shafted so much as they were "beating the system" and were made to stop...ironically the government moves seemed to protect real retailers from guys looking to cut them out.
No attack intended GJ. I am really responding based on my reading comprehension skills so be easy on me!