cacman wrote:Of course I read the article knumbnuts, or I wouldn't have posted it.
Only offered it because I thought the Washington Times was a more reputable source than Slate.
Regardless of his past votes and the ambiguity in which he voted, the "word" on the Hill (not the media) is that he supports stricter gun control and follows the big "O"s and UN agenda.
So you assume the washington times is a more reputable source, but the article you posted titles itself "Merrick Garland has ‘very liberal view of gun rights’"... and then proceeds to provide no actual evidence that he has any opinion on gun rights.
This guy may be the most liberal gun grabber out there. But just saying so simply isn't enough for me. I'd like to see either rulings he's made, or public statements he's made... or even facebook posts.
I don't even know what position you were trying to argue with that article, since the title and the content essentially say two differen things.