America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by sd72. 86 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
the Repulik of Kalifornia and NY to raise min wage to $15/hr
teddyballgame Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
...this is the kind of foolishness you get when one party rules in a state.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/california-york-poised-raise-minimum-wage-15-044101837--finance.html


this is going to hurt small businesses and hurt lower income workers who will be fired or not hired.. why not $25/hr?

this is particularly precious from the article:

"Increases of $1 an hour would come every January until 2022. The governor could delay increases in times of budgetary or economic downturns."


Why would economic downturns matter? Isn't raising the min wage such a boon for the economy?

California lawmakers make me sick.

I wish this was an April fools joke.
teedubbya Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I'm with you on the issue. That said I'm also for states rights and letting them do what they want. So in that sense... meh. I don't live there.
victor809 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teddyballgame wrote:
...this is the kind of foolishness you get when one party rules in a state.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/california-york-poised-raise-minimum-wage-15-044101837--finance.html


this is going to hurt small businesses and hurt lower income workers who will be fired or not hired.. why not $25/hr?

this is particularly precious from the article:

"Increases of $1 an hour would come every January until 2022. The governor could delay increases in times of budgetary or economic downturns."


Why would economic downturns matter? Isn't raising the min wage such a boon for the economy?

California lawmakers make me sick.

I wish this was an April fools joke.


Stupid question.... I live in CA, and I generally oppose any sort of minimum wage laws... if I want to pay a guy $2/hr to clean my taint, and there's someone willing to take that job... let the free market reign.

But I would think that individual states choosing what their minimum wage would be, individually, as part of the state's right to do so.... would be something a tea partier like you would support?
ZRX1200 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
Oregon too. ..
teedubbya Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
only a buck fifty here for taint cleaning... 2 dollah if they have a full set of teef.... tree fity for MACS
frankj1 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
teedubbya wrote:
only a buck fifty here for taint cleaning... 2 dollah if they have a full set of teef.... tree fity for MACS

just told my wife to pack up, we're moving to K.C.
teedubbya Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
kansas city here we come?
victor809 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
only a buck fifty here for taint cleaning... 2 dollah if they have a full set of teef.... tree fity for MACS


Wow... I usually have to pay illegal mexican labor cash to get those sorta rates.
DrafterX Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Well, I bet it takes less than 10 hours to clean most taints... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
victor taint talkin bout love, his love is rotten to the core
victor809 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
So, let's get off my taint for a little and get back to why Teddyballs wants to start dictating to states what they can and can't do....

Freaking libtard.
DrafterX Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Should we start a new thread about your dirty taint..?? Huh
victor809 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
Should we start a new thread about your dirty taint..?? Huh


It's pretty clean now... cost me a lot, but after a couple hundred $$ and a handful of illegal immigrants I got it clean.
DrafterX Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
I'll take that as a no then.. Mellow
fiddler898 Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
And all thanks to a livable wage. Imagine that.
teddyballgame Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
victor809 wrote:
Stupid question.... I live in CA, and I generally oppose any sort of minimum wage laws... if I want to pay a guy $2/hr to clean my taint, and there's someone willing to take that job... let the free market reign.

But I would think that individual states choosing what their minimum wage would be, individually, as part of the state's right to do so.... would be something a tea partier like you would support?



Tyranny is tyranny, whether it be done at the federal level or at the state level.

I agree with your initial sentence entirely, that an owner or business should be able to pay any wage to which the other party agrees.

victor809 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
So you are against States rights if they're doing something you don't like?
tonygraz Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
He's very confused, Victor. He was a big Carson supporter and now he's gaga over Cruz - what do you expect.
gummy jones Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
They are free to do as they please
Hopefully Cali can offer them all lifelong pensions from age 50 on so the state can be even more broke
Speyside Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Actually he is against left states using their rights.
tailgater Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Why try to better yourself in order to earn more money.
You can just wait for the assistant nose picker job to require a "livable wage".

And we wonder why America is losing jobs overseas and south of the border.

Damn those corporate pigs.

Gene363 Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,870
But who is going to spit on your fast food when it ordered and delivered by a machine?
tonygraz Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
The machine mechanic and it could be worse if he's the guy that used to work at Kellog's.
victor809 Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Tg... I'm not sure I'd call 15$/hr a liveable wage. Doesn't mean I want to pay my taint lickers that much... But in SF that's not anything you can live off of.

15$/hr is about 30k/yr.... That's the cost of rent, literally that's exactly what I pay for less than 500sq ft in the middle of a third world country (worse even, in 3rd world countries they sh$t in the river, not on the sidewalk)...

For another 6k a year we've considered getting an extra 100sqft and slightly fewer homeless people
Gene363 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,870
tonygraz wrote:
The machine mechanic and it could be worse if he's the guy that used to work at Kellog's.


Automated contamination. d'oh!

Version II will use sealed condiment and component packages, e.g., pick slime and bread dough charges. I hope when the Kellogg guy is on work release it isn't at the burger component packaging plant.
tonygraz Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
Where there's a will, there's a way.
sd72 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
Allow free trade with anyone even if they use child labor, and don't follow any type of EPA type of standards. Have no regulations on safety of materials in any product except written ones.

Allow companies to move their headquarters outside of the US, paying lower taxes there, but still operate in 'merica paying no corporate taxes here.

Don't penalize any company for using illegal immigrants, paying no taxes on them.

Allow American companies to manufacture outside of the US and import freely paying lower wages, and little to no benefits.

Raise the min wage because people aren't making enough money.




Makes total sense.
Brewha Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
The sentiment of the OP is the ongoing sad commentary of this nation. It is the lower middle class voicing their disdain for the working poor getting anything close to an even break.

Too many Americans don't understand the history of how we came to need welfare. And never see that without levels of wage control, the government only subsidies the companies that keep the working poor in need. Too complex I suppose.

Checks and balances are needed for wages because unbridled capiatlisum leads to an extreme concentration of wealth, while more and more go hungry.

But is is so much easier to spit upon the poor. Sure it's low class, obtuse and misanthropic - But we do it.
we sure do.



Next up; fallacious arguments that minimum wages hurt the economy - squat and watch, someone's gonna float those fool ideas.....
frankj1 Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
how many poor people are there in congress?
tonygraz Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
And how many get much richer while there thanks to insider information.
jjanecka Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 12-08-2015
Posts: 4,334
States rights are better than federal rights. I would much rather NY and Cali raise to $15 thant see it across the board. What good for them isn't always good for us.

Limit the federal government.
Brewha Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
frankj1 wrote:
how many poor people are there in congress?

When you say "poor", does that include morally bankrupt?
danmdevries Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2014
Posts: 17,522
^ this #31

Let em have it.

But 30k/yr here is plenty living wage. I lived in the low 30's without much trouble. I'm not even double that now with a family, and still doing fine.
tonygraz Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
I also like the idea of a maximum wage.
tailgater Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
tonygraz wrote:
I also like the idea of a maximum wage.


Just when we thought you couldn't sound even MORE ridiculous.
Never change, man.
You are a hoot.

gummy jones Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
tonygraz wrote:
I also like the idea of a maximum wage.


All those who seem to agree with that statement usually set the bar at $1 more than they make

How noble of them

Right on par with being incredibly generous with someone else's money
frankj1 Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
gummy jones wrote:
All those who seem to agree with that statement usually set the bar at $1 more than they make

How noble of them

Right on par with being incredibly generous with someone else's money

I hate salary caps in pro sports...
teedubbya Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I do like little pro sports caps though.
victor809 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Do you put the little caps on your **** and pretend it's a baseball player?
frankj1 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
teedubbya wrote:
I do like little pro sports caps though.

Royal blue?
MACS Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,881
teedubbya wrote:
I'm with you on the issue. That said I'm also for states rights and letting them do what they want. So in that sense... meh. I don't live there.


Yessir... I was just reading that last year more people left CA for TX than ever before. That sh*t will self correct. All the people with sense will be leaving, and the rest will be left with their hands out... and nobody to fill them. LOL
tonygraz Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
I've noticed Texas getting crazier- now you may have hit on the cause.
Abrignac Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,358
Makes tons of sense. Raise the minimum wage. Then prices be em to creep up making it more advantageous to ship even more jobs overseas to countries who don't have a minimum wage. How many people here have friends whose jobs were outsourced overseas. Why do the Chinese import American steel, produce products and ship them back here for less than they can be made here?

If we want to compete we have to be competitive. Sadly we are becoming less every day. Tariff's do create price floors but, they also protect American jobs. Today we have less protective import laws. Hence, more and more of what we consume is imported. Pick your poison.

People are also becoming lazy. Instead of working for what the market will bare, many chose to live off government benefits.

Brewha Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
Abrignac wrote:
Makes tons of sense. Raise the minimum wage. Then prices be em to creep up making it more advantageous to ship even more jobs overseas to countries who don't have a minimum wage. How many people here have friends whose jobs were outsourced overseas. Why do the Chinese import American steel, produce products and ship them back here for less than they can be made here?

If we want to compete we have to be competitive. Sadly we are becoming less every day. Tariff's do create price floors but, they also protect American jobs. Today we have less protective import laws. Hence, more and more of what we consume is imported. Pick your poison.

People are also becoming lazy. Instead of working for what the market will bare, many chose to live off government benefits.


It does make a ton a sence to raise the minimum wage - although many can't see it. You want more people off food stamps? Then let's stop subsidizing Walmart.

Ross Perot said "if NAFTA passes, you will hear a giant sucking sound". And brother he was right. But the buisness owners are just loving the cheap labor. It's better than our imported undocumented labor....

If you can't qualify for more than a minimum wage job, does that make you lazy? I send a lot of time is warehouses and fulfillment centers - trust me when I say that there are a lot of people without much ability. Oh, they hump boxes and build pallets, break a sweat all day - but don't ask them to think too much. They are not lazy - just disadvantaged in the market. That's why our factories love the Chinese - they can think and have to work for nothing.
victor809 Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Brewha wrote:
It does make a ton a sence to raise the minimum wage - although many can't see it. You want more people off food stamps? Then let's stop subsidizing Walmart.

Ross Perot said "if NAFTA passes, you will hear a giant sucking sound". And brother he was right. But the buisness owners are just loving the cheap labor. It's better than our imported undocumented labor....

If you can't qualify for more than a minimum wage job, does that make you lazy? I send a lot of time is warehouses and fulfillment centers - trust me when I say that there are a lot of people without much ability. Oh, they hump boxes and build pallets, break a sweat all day - but don't ask them to think too much. They are not lazy - just disadvantaged in the market. That's why our factories love the Chinese - they can think and have to work for nothing.


I'm not sure whether you're advocating a minimum wage or not here....

If someone just "hump[s] boxes and build[s] pallets, break a sweat all day - but don't ask them to think too much".... is their time worth more than $15/hr? I mean regardless of whether they need that amount of money.... if their entire job is little more than glorified forklift, is that delivering $30,000/year of value to a company (actually closer to $45,000 after taxes etc).

The more expensive people get, without adding additional value (such as thinking), the more attractive an automated solution becomes (ie, Amazon's largely automated warehouses)
ZRX1200 Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
The force needs to come from people refusing low wages, and there needs to be restrictions on outsourcing. That I can compromise on, NOT forcing artificial wages that do nothing. When people not earning $15/hour are making $15/hr S will hit the fan.

Wages and inflation have gutted the middle class. But the answer is not a knee jerk one like this that doesn't sole the nuisance of root cause.

But hey YMMV.
tonygraz Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,318
The thing is that there has been inflation and the minimum wage remains the same. It seem that when someone raises the minimum wage things get better and all the negative things don't happen.
victor809 Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tonygraz wrote:
The thing is that there has been inflation and the minimum wage remains the same. It seem that when someone raises the minimum wage things get better and all the negative things don't happen.


Are you sure the negatives didn't happen? Or are you just not impacted by them?

I agree that businesses don't close. Smart people don't just shutter a business because a cost of goods has gone up, they retool.

But has service level actually remained the same over the years? Or do we always hear complaints about the service industry not being really service oriented? doesn't poor service sound like a side-effect of understaffing? Do we always hear complaints about having to deal with call centers in countries which speak wtih an accent some people can't understand?

Look at how automation has increased splendidly over the decades. You don't invest the time and capital in building a robot if you can have a person do the job cheaper (total cost including cost of re-work because of sloppy labor).

Don't get me wrong, I don't consider automation to be a negative, but one of the things which spurs innovation in that field is the idea that your robot can compete with the cost of labor. So some people not being paid to do a job is the cost of advances in manufacturing technology.

Not all of this is related to minimum wages. Sometimes the market rate for a specific job simply is high enough on its own to encourage automation of that task. But it is hard to tweeze them apart.
Brewha Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
victor809 wrote:
I'm not sure whether you're advocating a minimum wage or not here....

If someone just "hump[s] boxes and build[s] pallets, break a sweat all day - but don't ask them to think too much".... is their time worth more than $15/hr? I mean regardless of whether they need that amount of money.... if their entire job is little more than glorified forklift, is that delivering $30,000/year of value to a company (actually closer to $45,000 after taxes etc).

The more expensive people get, without adding additional value (such as thinking), the more attractive an automated solution becomes (ie, Amazon's largely automated warehouses)

Oh, you are right about Amazon. My business it so build warehouse automation for them and many others. A big factor in the ROI for a system is not just lowering head count; it is greater operator efficiency and accuracy. So the people with simple tasks get a lot more done and a lot less wrong – they become worth more, while being payed less.

And it is the job of any business buying labor to get it as cheap as possible – free is best. Think of the boon to the US economy if all workers took a 50% pay cut! We should all be for that – yes?
Businesses are not there to benefit workers; they are there to generate profits. So workers are a necessary evil that are fundamentally opposed to business goals.

But there is a social truth here to be reckoned with – If business can drive the cost of their labor as low as they would like, then the workers need government supplements to get by. All workers must earn a living. If they can’t than the business model is not viable and it is the business that is living off the government.

There will always be pools of poor laborers that are forced to take little to nothing for their work, because something is better than nothing. But we all pay for that in the end.
Speyside Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Fork lift drivers lives matter.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>