victor809 wrote:I'm not sure whether you're advocating a minimum wage or not here....
If someone just "hump[s] boxes and build[s] pallets, break a sweat all day - but don't ask them to think too much".... is their time worth more than $15/hr? I mean regardless of whether they need that amount of money.... if their entire job is little more than glorified forklift, is that delivering $30,000/year of value to a company (actually closer to $45,000 after taxes etc).
The more expensive people get, without adding additional value (such as thinking), the more attractive an automated solution becomes (ie, Amazon's largely automated warehouses)
Oh, you are right about Amazon. My business it so build warehouse automation for them and many others. A big factor in the ROI for a system is not just lowering head count; it is greater operator efficiency and accuracy. So the people with simple tasks get a lot more done and a lot less wrong – they become worth more, while being payed less.
And it is the job of any business buying labor to get it as cheap as possible – free is best. Think of the boon to the US economy if all workers took a 50% pay cut! We should all be for that – yes?
Businesses are not there to benefit workers; they are there to generate profits. So workers are a necessary evil that are fundamentally opposed to business goals.
But there is a social truth here to be reckoned with – If business can drive the cost of their labor as low as they would like, then the workers need government supplements to get by.
All workers must earn a living. If they can’t than the business model is not viable and it is the business that is living off the government.
There will always be pools of poor laborers that are forced to take little to nothing for their work, because something is better than nothing. But we all pay for that in the end.