Drafter it’s your fixation on hillary and this weird thing to connect it to Trump when there is no connection. It’s two separate things that shouldn’t keep getting connected. Trump does it as a diversionary thing. I’m not sure why you and others do. You do and have hated her “from day 1”. I take no issue with that. I do too. That doesn’t mean I have to leave logic behind. She did do things wrong. Many investigations happened. It’s public what went wrong. No credible legal minds beleive there is much if any chance of prosecuting for any criminal behavior based on the law. Her opponents and people that hate her as much as you and I control the mechanisms to do so and would gladly do it if they even thought they had a 30-40 percent chance. They don’t.
As for trump I do t like him. Never have. It’s not political to me I didn’t like him a few years ago when he was a democrat. I hope he did nothing wrong for the good of the country. I honestly hope lifelong Republican Mueller clears him. I also beleive Mueller is looking in to Russian influence and any crimes uncovered along the way. To me that includes if fisa courts were abused, if the dems had improper contacts etc. his charge doesn’t say Republican or trump abuses only.. his charge is from Republicans and it is dumb to think he’d ignore dem wrong doing but go after R or T wrong doing only. That defies logic and ignores who and what he has been over the years.
Every now and then Mueller drops an indightment or plea. Very little if any leaking. It seems to me the leaks we do see are from the folks he questions. It would not surprise me to see an indightment against some dems if he sees anything. If not I’d guess he’s looked and seen nothing. He’s got no reason and it makes no sense that he’d be an anti R hound dog other than some of the dumb conspiracy crap out there. That narrative is only meant to attempt to discredit the investigation or to obstruct it. It just doesn’t hunt.
So to you birtherism was Obama’s fault. Hillary’s crimes were clear and prosecutable but her opponents (republicans) who control that just won’t do it. Hillary’s opponents will go after Trump hard though and that’s just not fair.
I just do t get it. But I’ll listen and my mind can be changed.
I’ve hated Hillary since day 1 much like you. I’ve never liked Trump. I can’t take him seriously. But I hope he’s clean for the good of the country. If he’s not I hope they nail him. I don’t understand the need to link the trump investigation to hillary (actually I do but it’s nefarious). I also beleive all the attempts to muddy the current investigation is the opposite of wanting the truth. And using every tool to do so is telling. If not agreeing with that is to be painted by hate and hate alone than so be it. Sounds like opposite land to me.
DrafterX wrote:I never said Trump shouldn't be investigated.. if something turns up worth while I'll condemn him... But just because CNN says somethin should be investigated doesn't mean it should be.
This is awesome. You never said he shouldn’t be investigated and if something is found you would condemn him. Then you suggest there should be no investigation just because CNN says there should be. I’m not aware of any investigation occurring because CNN says there should be.
I am aware of an effort to discredit the press and tie them to the investigation. That effort says there should be no investigation which of course you have never said. It sure seems like you are firmly in that camp.
