Mrs. dpnewell wrote:Without even realizing it, you just proved my point about most of the media running with the lie. If you had read the original article, you would have realized that CBS News reported 202,796 and that the New York Times reported 180,000 based on research and analysis done by professional firms. News organizations that are definitely NOT right leaning. If fact, two of the few who did not fall for the lie.
Of course I'm bias, and so are you. In fact everyone on this thread is bias in one way or the other, no matter how "non-partisan" they believe themselves to be. Your point?
David (dpnewell)
That you choose to post that the original numbers were fudged told me instantly that you had a bias. That was my point. Pointing that out, if it's even true, tells me that you'rereally interested in skirting the real issue: why the kids gathered in the first place.
Sure we're all bias.
So now CBS and the NYT have reported numbers closer to 200,000.
Other so-called news sources say more. And others even less.
I miss reliable news sources. I feel like we're in limbo these days.
If I was trying to make any other point, cause I could care less about over-exaggerated or under-exaggerated head counts, it was that this was a pretty serious moment in American history. People are insisting on action and change regarding guns and school shootings.
How many people showed up is irrelevant as compared to the reason they showed up
Is it messed up that a MSN source has an agenda? Sure. But given that they're, imo, on the side of saner regulations regarding guns, I'm lukewarm ok with it.