HuckFinn wrote:Talk about partisanship TG!
Are you saying without corroboration abuses/crimes can't be perpetrated?
If a tree falls in the forest, and there's nobody around to hear, it doesn't make a sound?
Thanks for clearing that up.
He's lying because he wants the job. In fairness, if there was ever a time to lie, especially knowing there's no way to know the real truth, now would be the time! Hardly begrudge him that...
She told the truth because she couldn't stand the fact that a blackout drunk groper was being awarded a seat on the Supreme Court.
I understand most here don't agree with the above. Why?
Partisan politics. I get it.
But you're wrong.
Because it's just a matter of cons vs. Libs, this good old boy who believes that it's okay to terrify and manhandle a girl is going to try to help repeal abortion. Soooooo..knock em up and deny them abortions.
I get it.
I've said all along that "something" happened to her.
But her coached responses have hidden the truth so deep that we'll never know.
I doubt it even involved Kavanaugh, based on what we know to be true (truth = not Ford's and not Kavanaugh's words).
As a society we need to believe the accusers in order to find justice.
But when the data points to a different truth, we can't ignore it simply because we have empathy.
You call it partisan, but it's the exact opposite.
My partisan side wants a conservative judge to be appointed.
The facts support the defense of the conservative judge.
Doesn't make the facts less true. Or my viewpoint more biased.
Opinions that counter the facts, on the other hand, are driven solely by partisan bias.
YMMV