America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 4 years ago by fishinguitarman. 162 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
The Saga of Alabama....
izonfire Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,661
JadeRose wrote:
If you line your underwear with sage, your farts smell like Thanksgiving!


I'm actually gonna try this - thank you Jade!
frankj1 Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,234
might wanna try it before the guests arrive.
izonfire Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,661
frankj1 wrote:
might wanna try it before the guests arrive.


Happy Thanksgiving!!!
frankj1 Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,234
izonfire wrote:
Happy Thanksgiving!!!

let's hope so.
teedubbya Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I just drew a banjo on my knee with a sharpie.
frankj1 Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,234
can your knee predict the weather?
Mine can.
teedubbya Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It’s not that sharp
Speyside Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Get it right first try or did you have to use some white out?
teedubbya Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
No one came on the banjo on my knee. At least no one from Alabama.
izonfire Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,661
teedubbya wrote:
No one came on the banjo on my knee. At least no one from Alabama.


Maybe you rubbed 'em the wrong way.
Y'know, they're differnt down thar...
DrafterX Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566


The federal agency that monitors hurricanes said Friday that Hurricane Dorian could have impacted Alabama, backing claims by President Trump that he was right to tweet a warning over the weekend about the storm affecting the state.

In an unsigned statement, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said that "information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama." The advisories in question were dated from Wednesday, Aug. 28 to Monday, Sept. 2, the agency said.

Film at 11... Think
victor809 Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Oh... Now you get involved.

Yes I was going to post that when I had a moment and my computer so I could properly cut and paste....

It needs a full run down though.
DrafterX Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
Headline caught my eye... was silly outrage from the start... Mellow
bs_kwaj Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 02-13-2006
Posts: 5,214

Which one of the idiot Democrats is everybody gonna vote for? BigGrin

Beer
DrafterX Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
I'm writing in Kanye... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
bs_kwaj wrote:
Which one of the idiot Democrats is everybody gonna vote for? BigGrin

Beer

Any of the idiot Democrats is still smarter than trumpenfurher....

As tw says..ham sandwich

..
teedubbya Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Sammich
fishinguitarman Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,152
Oh no! Vicki was wrong!?!?

AGAIN!?!?
CelticBomber Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
I'm confused here. Trump listed a bunch of states that would/could be affected. The weather service released a statement that said don't worry Alabama you're okay, right? Who criticized Trump? Then Trump goes on a tweet frenzy defending his inclusion of Alabama and starts posting maps he drew on and has a mini-meltdown. So did the weather service say something like Alabama is fine and Trump is a ding-a-ling? What was it that set the Great Pumpkin off?
Abrignac Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,340
victor809 wrote:
Trumpenfurher really really wanted it to be in danger.

So... this all started innocently enough... trump wanted alabama to look out for that big bad hurricane. He loves alabama and doesn't want it to get hurt:


Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
"In addition to Florida - South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama, will most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated. Looking like one of the largest hurricanes ever. Already category 5. BE CAREFUL! GOD BLESS EVERYONE!"

Well... the national weather service, in what I can only assume was an attempt to not have people in alabama panic from suddenly being in the path of a hurricane.... had to have the misfortune of contradicting el presidente.


NWS Birmingham
@NWSBirmingham
"Alabama will NOT see any impacts from #Dorian. We repeat, no impacts from Hurricane #Dorian will be felt across Alabama. The system will remain too far east. #alwx"

That's when crap went off the rails. I mean... who does the national weather service think he is anyway? Some weather person? Why would they know more about weather than the president of the united states who sleeps through all his briefings? Well... it was on:


Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
"Such a phony hurricane report by lightweight reporter @jonkarl of @ABCWorldNews. I suggested yesterday at FEMA that, along with Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina, even Alabama could possibly come into play, which WAS true. They made a big deal about this...
....when in fact, under certain original scenarios, it was in fact correct that Alabama could have received some “hurt.” Always good to be prepared! But the Fake News is only interested in demeaning and belittling. Didn’t play my whole sentence or statement. Bad people!"

This statement is obviously in response to some reporting.... on his tweet.... which you see in full above. there is no "some 'hurt'"....

But no... we're not satisfied with just leaving it at that....

At noonish, the white house twitter feed released a video of:

The White House
@WhiteHouse
"President @realDonaldTrump gives an update on Hurricane #Dorian: "
https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1169300628000124929

In this, the president of the united states, I sh#t you not, holds up a map with a black sharpie drawing a circle around alabama to extend the hurricane radius of influence.

.... the president of the united states.... couldn't find a better way to fake a hurricane impact diagram on a piece of paper.... That's really what's so embarrassing about this.... that could have been done professionally at kinkos or something for 10$.

Then, around 5:30 pm, the trumpenfurher gets a bit more sophisticated. He tweets this map:

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
"This was the originally projected path of the Hurricane in its early stages. As you can see, almost all models predicted it to go through Florida also hitting Georgia and Alabama. I accept the Fake News apologies!"
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1169375550806351872

Now.... you'd think this is real. I mean, it's a map... at the bottom it says "sfwmd.gov" and it shows a lot of lines of "possible paths".... a couple of which go into alabama.

But hang on.... one of them goes off the map completely... that's odd.
And.... do they even follow the dots/data points at all? or are they randomly drawn on there?

Ohh..... I see.... I suppose I shouldn't have wished for better photoshop capabilities from the president. Yeah... no....
So that map, was taken from the forecasts from sfwmd.

https://twitter.com/eugenegu/status/1169417014470795264

You can see, all they did was draw more lines on it... and ignored the actual dots which are supposed to direct how the lines are drawn.

So the president has now, to try to provide evidence that he was correct, falsified data he's presented to the US people twice in as many days.

And he still won't let it drop!

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
"In the early days of the hurricane, when it was predicted that Dorian would go through Miami or West Palm Beach, even before it reached the Bahamas, certain models strongly suggested that Alabama & Georgia would be hit as it made its way through Florida & to the Gulf....
....Instead it turned North and went up the coast, where it continues now. In the one model through Florida, the Great State of Alabama would have been hit or grazed. In the path it took, no. Read my FULL FEMA statement. What I said was accurate! All Fake News in order to demean!"


He's doubled down... tripled down... quadrupled down... quintupled down... faked hurricane path maps TWICE... BADLY!!!.... all because he cannot just say "sorry, my bad".

You know what's most hilarious about the whole thing?

He's right

Took me two minutes of googling to find an ACTUAL early prediction model map from 27Aug19 of dorian's path.
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=120454&start=700

In this map, there are two potential paths into Alabama, and one into the coast of Louisiana.

does this mean trump saw this map back on the 27th? Maybe? I don't necessarily believe he did.... nor do I believe he can remember what he had for breakfast, let alone a map from a week ago.

But what it does mean is that the incompetent people running his administration could have pulled that exact same map I found up and pointed to it.... rather than amateurishly faking two others. How can the administration surrounding the president of the united states be this disgustingly incompetent?







Don’t want to pi$$ on your parade, but your post shows is naive. I’ve lived on the gulf coast for at least 40 of my 54 years. I’m not sure about the time line of his remarks, but earlier models had Dorian cutting across the gulf coast. Had it continued on that path not only Alabama, but Mississippi and even Louisiana could have been effected by tropical force winds and flash flooding.
Abrignac Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,340
Just looked at the meme that the left is using. It shows Dorian heard almost due west. Having closely watched at least 5 hurricanes a year since I was about 12 years old; yes, even children on the gulf coast watch hurricane tracks I can say with 100% certainty that parts of Alabama would have experienced Dorian. Not nearly as much as the East Coast of FL. Hell, as big and powerful as Dorian was at that time, parts of Alabama would have began experiencing the effects by the time the eye wall made land fall. Hint: Part of Alabama is due north of the Florida panhandle.

But, don’t take my word for it. You can easily verify what I’m saying by looking at the tracks of EVERY hurricane that has hit the gulf states. Make sure you overlay a map of the US with those prior tracks.
victor809 Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Abrignac wrote:
Don’t want to pi$$ on your parade, but your post shows is naive. I’ve lived on the gulf coast for at least 40 of my 54 years. I’m not sure about the time line of his remarks, but earlier models had Dorian cutting across the gulf coast. Had it continued on that path not only Alabama, but Mississippi and even Louisiana could have been effected by tropical force winds and flash flooding.


You clearly didn't read the entire post you quoted.

Do you see the part where I said he was right?

Like I said... the right or wrong part isn't the issue. It's that he spent 2 days putting out 2nd grade arts and crafts level falsified information to try to prove that he was "right", because no one in his administration was smart enough to find actual data that took me 2 minutes to find.
Abrignac Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,340
victor809 wrote:
You clearly didn't read the entire post you quoted.

Do you see the part where I said he was right?

Like I said... the right or wrong part isn't the issue. It's that he spent 2 days putting out 2nd grade arts and crafts level falsified information to try to prove that he was "right", because no one in his administration was smart enough to find actual data that took me 2 minutes to find.


If that’s the case then why did you include the first few paragraphs since as you seem to be saying is irrelevant?

I’ll admit I didn’t read the rest of the post, because you lost credibly in the intro.
victor809 Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
The federal agency that monitors hurricanes said Friday that Hurricane Dorian could have impacted Alabama, backing claims by President Trump that he was right to tweet a warning over the weekend about the storm affecting the state.

In an unsigned statement, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said that "information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama." The advisories in question were dated from Wednesday, Aug. 28 to Monday, Sept. 2, the agency said.

Film at 11... Think


So... let's address this. It really does deserve more attention.

First, lets pick up where we left off, with trump still blaming the Fake News and Democrats for people mocking him for his sharpie skills....

On friday, he tweets (not a re-tweet, so either someone on his staff spent the time to make this, or downloaded it from 8chan or some other place) a video of himself making various expressions, interspersed with clips of CNN identifying Alabama as a potential target for hurricane Dorian.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1170089069105340416

Now, enterprising people have determined the date of the CNN clips to be from Wed, 28Aug. Note again, trump's tweet about alabama was Sun 1Sep... so he's literally bragging about using 4 or 5 day old data on a hurricane....
Let that sink in. The president, who gets updates multiple times a day on an approaching hurricane... is bragging that he was as accurate as a news station was 4-5 days earlier. AND he wasted resources to put together a video to do that bragging.

Additionally on Friday, an unattributed statement was made by NOAA which says in full:
"From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama. This is clearly demonstrated in Hurricane Advisories #15 through #41, which can be viewed at the following link.

The Birmingham National Weather Service’s Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time."

This is very similar to the statement by the homeland security advisor. They're not willing to fully commit, they say "tropical storm force winds"... by the time frame they are discussing, there is no expectation that the hurricane itself will move towards Alabama. But they are willing to provide some cover (as I pointed out in prior posts, there was a 5% chance that winds of 39mph will hit some edge of Alabama by 1Sep. )...

This statement, of course then draws blowback from the actual workers at NOAA. As the president of the NWS union tweeted:
"Let me assure you the hard working employees of the NWS had nothing to do with the utterly disgusting and disingenuous tweet sent out by NOAA management tonight,"

This has drawn a lot of speculation that the NOAA statement was drafted and released by the trump appointed head of NOAA.

More amusingly, after the Birmingham NWS had contradicted trump's 01Sep tweet, an email was apparently sent to all staff from upper officials at NOAA whihc reads:
"only stick with official National Hurricane Center forecasts if questions arise from some national level social media posts which hit the news this afternoon."


And, because the great Alabama Hurricane that never was Saga of 2019 just won't end.... trumpenfurher continues to tweet about it. On Saturday he tweeted the following:
"The Failing New York Times stated, in an article written by Obama flunky Peter Baker (who lovingly wrote Obama book),”Even after the President forecast the storm to include Alabama.” THIS IS NOT TRUE. I said, VERY EARLY ON, that it MAY EVEN hit Alabama. A BIG DIFFERENCE.....
...FAKE NEWS. I would like very much to stop referring to this ridiculous story, but the LameStream Media just won’t let it alone. They always have to have the last word, even though they know they are defrauding & deceiving the public. The public knows that the Media is corrupt!"

He's blaming the media for not letting it drop. When he won't stop tweeting stupid and contradictory things about it.

Here he's claiming that it was only very early on that he said it "may" hit Alabama. Well, I will let you judge his truthfullness on that, as it could have to do with your interpretation of the words "most likely" and "(much) harder". He could wiggle out on this, as "harder than expected" when the expected is nearly 0.... but his timing is ridiculous, as I pointed out he was tweeting days old information at best.

Then, AGAIN, because it's the fake news that won't let it drop... he retweets that idiotic video where he brags about having 4-5day old data.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1170089069105340416

Then... because our country cannot possibly get any dumber, and our president cannot let something dumb like this drop.... he tweets ANOTHER video, made by a group @som3thingwicked, which apparently likes to use a bunch of white nationalist memes interspersed with their posts.... so I'm super glad our president listens to them..
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1170546650651271169

In this video, they imply that the entire dumb sharpie drawing on the map was done to distract CNN, like a cat with a laser pointer.

Yes.... the president is now openly saying he is being an idiot so we don't pay attention to something else he's doing (presumably something worse than being an idiot)....



victor809 Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Abrignac wrote:
If that’s the case then why did you include the first few paragraphs since as you seem to be saying is irrelevant?

I’ll admit I didn’t read the rest of the post, because you lost credibly in the intro.


If you're not going to read the entire post, then why bother commenting on it?

I put the information where it is important to be considered.

Reading the "intro" (dude.... what do you even consider the "intro"? because I only typed 2 lines before I started directly quoting tweets... so if you think I lost credibility you didn't read more than 2 lines of a 60+ line post...) and then commenting on it like that is a sure way to be wrong.
fishinguitarman Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,152
It’s all good! You can’t lose credibility if you never had it
delta1 Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,819
bottom line...this was a non-story, until Trump insisted on proving he was right about Alabama, using an obviously falsified weather map...

at the time he included Alabama in the danger zone, Sunday, 9/1, weather forecasters had already changed their predicted course for Dorian, forecasts which did not include AL, so the locals immediately responded to Trump's tweet saying Alabama was not in danger....all he had to say was that he's glad more areas of the US were not endangered or damaged and move on...

instead of describing US fed aid efforts to the devastated Bahamas and US coastal areas affected by Dorian, he HAD to make the news coverage about himself...

thereby making himself look churlishly childish and further eroding his credibility among Americans, and to the world at large..


normally, we expect the POTUS to provide accurate info during emergency situations and calm leadership...that has changed with Trump...
izonfire Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,661
fishinguitarman wrote:
It’s all good! You can’t lose credibility if you never had it


Somebody need a line of credit?
The rate of interest is extremely low...
Abrignac Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,340
victor809 wrote:
If you're not going to read the entire post, then why bother commenting on it?

I put the information where it is important to be considered.

Reading the "intro" (dude.... what do you even consider the "intro"? because I only typed 2 lines before I started directly quoting tweets... so if you think I lost credibility you didn't read more than 2 lines of a 60+ line post...) and then commenting on it like that is a sure way to be wrong.


It is time to have both a JPOTTS Math lesson as well as a JPOTTS English Composition lesson.

Trumpenfurher really really wanted it to be in danger.

So... this all started innocently enough... trump wanted alabama to look out for that big bad hurricane. He loves alabama and doesn't want it to get hurt:

victor809 wrote:

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
"In addition to Florida - South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama, will most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated. Looking like one of the largest hurricanes ever. Already category 5. BE CAREFUL! GOD BLESS EVERYONE!"

Well... the national weather service, in what I can only assume was an attempt to not have people in alabama panic from suddenly being in the path of a hurricane.... had to have the misfortune of contradicting el presidente.


NWS Birmingham
@NWSBirmingham
"Alabama will NOT see any impacts from #Dorian. We repeat, no impacts from Hurricane #Dorian will be felt across Alabama. The system will remain too far east. #alwx"

That's when crap went off the rails. I mean... who does the national weather service think he is anyway? Some weather person? Why would they know more about weather than the president of the united states who sleeps through all his briefings? Well... it was on:


Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
"Such a phony hurricane report by lightweight reporter @jonkarl of @ABCWorldNews. I suggested yesterday at FEMA that, along with Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina, even Alabama could possibly come into play, which WAS true. They made a big deal about this...
....when in fact, under certain original scenarios, it was in fact correct that Alabama could have received some “hurt.” Always good to be prepared! But the Fake News is only interested in demeaning and belittling. Didn’t play my whole sentence or statement. Bad people!"


The Math lesson is first.

I’ll use Integers instead of Real Numbers so as to not confuse anyone. One is the lowest positive integer. Two is one integer more than one. Twenty-five is twenty-four integers more than one integer. You’ll notice I’ve quoted the first twenty-five text lines of your original post. No where in that post did you set a timeline.

Here’s where the English Composition lesson begins.

The cornerstone of any effective persuasive position paper is to get in, state your case and get out. Nowhere in that selection of your text do you mention a date which is without doubt paramount for you to establish credibility. At some point you need to fish or cut bait. The sooner that’s done the better; otherwise, your opinion is rightly cast to the side as propaganda. With that said, there was absolutely no reason for me to continue reading your gibberish.

delta1 wrote:
bottom line...this was a non-story, until Trump insisted on proving he was right about Alabama, using an obviously falsified weather map...

at the time he included Alabama in the danger zone, Sunday, 9/1, weather forecasters had already changed their predicted course for Dorian, forecasts which did not include AL, so the locals immediately responded to Trump's tweet saying Alabama was not in danger....all he had to say was that he's glad more areas of the US were not endangered or damaged and move on...

instead of describing US fed aid efforts to the devastated Bahamas and US coastal areas affected by Dorian, he HAD to make the news coverage about himself...

thereby making himself look churlishly childish and further eroding his credibility among Americans, and to the world at large..


normally, we expect the POTUS to provide accurate info during emergency situations and calm leadership...that has changed with Trump...


Thank you Al. You quickly established a timeline.

For the record, IMHO his dog & pony show was certainly below the level that one would expect of the office he holds.
CelticBomber Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
You don't need ANY number to establish a time line.
Abrignac Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,340
CelticBomber wrote:
You don't need ANY number to establish a time line.


Actually, you’re are incorrect. Google “Trump Alabama hurricane” and find the graphic he used. I’m not sure what day he held that press conference, nor do I care since I’m not obsessed with exposing all his faults regardless of the significance, because I didn’t watch it. But, his use of the graphic you’ll find in your Google search would have been spot on when Dorian was a few hundred miles off the coast and headed straight towards Florida. So indeed a timeline is very important when putting this into context.

Not trying to be a deek, but you live on the upper East Coast. If you think a time line isn’t necessary to establish context you have absolutely no idea how hurricane paths affect the gulf states.
Abrignac Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,340
Oh, and since we’re on the subject, technically speaking a time line has times, not numbers. Google is again your friend when researching the difference between the two.
CelticBomber Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
Abrignac wrote:
Oh, and since we’re on the subject, technically speaking a time line has times, not numbers. Google is again your friend when researching the difference between the two.



Just one little problem with all of that.Time is subjective not objective. "Batman is usually seen at night." You've just established a timeline for when to expect to see Batman.

I prefer to read and consider many things when I do my thinking. Relying on Google to think for you isn't the best idea at all. Your move deep thinker.
Abrignac Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,340
CelticBomber wrote:
Just one little problem with all of that.Time is subjective not objective. "Batman is usually seen at night." You've just established a timeline for when to expect to see Batman.

I prefer to read and consider many things when I do my thinking. Relying on Google to think for you isn't the best idea at all. Your move deep thinker.


So is it your premise that regardless of the date, Trump would have always been wrong with his interpretation of that graphic?

The potato is yours again.
teedubbya Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
PT Barnum was right
CelticBomber Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
Abrignac wrote:
So is it your premise that regardless of the date, Trump would have always been wrong with his interpretation of that graphic?

The potato is yours again.



Ahh this is where you try some sleight of hand. The reality is he DIDN'T make his comment on the 28th. That's the day Dorian became a hurricane. That's the day the map he used a sharpie on was created too. He made his comment days later when it was known Alabama would NOT be affected.

Here's the time line so far...

Trump makes a statement that Alabama could be in danger

The weather service makes a statement to let the people of Alabama know they were okay.

Trump loses his mind.


It's that simple. This President made a minor mistake that NO ONE CALLED HIM ON. It becomes a major issue because of his own actions and you're so invested in this guy you can't detach yourself enough to go "Dunno why he's so butthurt over this. It's a nonissue."

I used the potato to make fries. They are crispy and taste of shame and below average reasoning. Need more salt though.... wonder if I can get Trump tears to season them...Think


So to answer your question that was made up out of thin air and tried to put words in my mouth..... No.
DrafterX Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
teedubbya wrote:
PT Barnum was right



'I will loose my camel, and trust it to God!" "No, no, not so," said the prophet, "tie thy camel, and trust it to God!'

Huh
CelticBomber Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
Confucius say Sarcasm 100% of the time is no longer Sarcasm. You can pick up your General Tso's chicken and Almond cookies at the front counter.
teedubbya Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
No no no said drafter, trump is god
DrafterX Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
I never said that... Not talking


Fake news.. Not talking
teedubbya Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Must have been abrig then.
Abrignac Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,340
CelticBomber wrote:
Ahh this is where you try some sleight of hand. The reality is he DIDN'T make his comment on the 28th. That's the day Dorian became a hurricane. That's the day the map he used a sharpie on was created too. He made his comment days later when it was known Alabama would NOT be affected.

Here's the time line so far...

Trump makes a statement the Alabama could be in danger

The weather service makes a statement to let the people of Alabama know they were okay.

Trump loses his mind.


It's that simple. This President made a minor mistake that NO ONE CALLED HIM ON. It becomes a major issue because of his own actions and you're so invested in this guy you can't detach yourself enough to go "Dunno why he's so butthurt over this. It's a nonissue."

I used the potato to make fries. They are crispy and taste of shame and below average reasoning. Need more salt though.... wonder if I can get Trump tears to season them...Think


So to answer your question that was made up out of thin air and tried to put words in my mouth..... No.


No sleight of hand. Reread the part where I said I didn't check the time line. When Dorian passed over the Bahamas it was headed almost due west. At that time Alabama was in play as was in play along with the rest of the gulf coast states. So if Trump had made his comments before Dorian turned north he would have been 100% correct. Since Victor's proclivities as far as Trump is concerned are well known anyone not sharing his beliefs would be foolish to take anything he says about Trump at face value.

As far as being invested in Trump and being butt hurt that he was called out, you really couldn't be any more wrong than you are. For the record, a few months or maybe a year ago I posted in these forums that I was tired of his antics.
The sad reality is that barring some miracle, I don't see how any of the current Democratic hopefuls can beat him. Their platforms are ridiculous. It's as if each of them is trying prove they are stupider than the rest of the pack. A Republican challenger is a non-issue and here isn't a third party candidate with a prayer's chance in hell of beating a Democrat candidate or Trump in the general election

My read: Trump will be re-elected. I will probably continue to support most of his platform, but nothing will be accomplished because the Democrats will once again waste political capital sparring with him instead of addressing needed legislation to address the issues that they say are dear to them.

The salt you speak of is not from tears, but ball sweat.
Abrignac Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,340
teedubbya wrote:
Must have been abrig then.


Nope, that was the climax of your wet dream.
teedubbya Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
If it’s and buts we’re cake and nuts....

It’s fun watching the spin on something so absolutely stupid. It simply doesn’t matter but to carry the water here is amusing.
teedubbya Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I never climax in my wet dreams. I just wake up sobbing.
CelticBomber Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
teedubbya wrote:
I never climax in my wet dreams. I just wake up sobbing.



Thanks Obama!
DrafterX Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
teedubbya wrote:
I never climax in my wet dreams. I just wake up slobbering.



sick bassard.... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
If pence had created a way back machine and trump had used it and then traced his hand and drawn a turkey then he could have used the earthquake machine to stop the hurricane.

It’s just so dumb
Abrignac Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,340
teedubbya wrote:
If it’s and buts we’re cake and nuts....

It’s fun watching the spin on something so absolutely stupid. It simply doesn’t matter but to carry the water here is amusing.



I was bored. No I have to finish some paperwork that's been percolating for a few days.
teedubbya Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Is that code for you have to take a dump?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>