America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 3 years ago by delta1. 94 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
Trump showing his whole ass....
victor809 Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
HockeyDad wrote:
I’m liking this “everybody’s a racist who disagrees” thing.

I know which may the wind is blowing so I’m on board.


I know you like to simplify everything as much as possible, but that is nowhere near what was stated. But hey, lets have some fun. "racist" is a variable term. The dude who locks his door when he sees a black person is a bit "racist". So is the dude who hangs a black person by the neck for looking at a white woman. Are those equivalent acts? Of course not. But they both fit under the same label. It then becomes a personal decision as to how comfortable you are with racism. I'm sure many people here are friends with people who lock their car door when they see black people. I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if some people here were comfortable being friends with someone who would lynch a black person.

So, on the topic is whether one racial group deserves to be treated equally by the police. Our president thinks that is "hate speech". The idea of one racial group not being oppressed by the police is "hate speech"... from the same guy who refuses to say anything negative about white supremacists. Supporting him for this reason makes you too racist for me. Supporting him for some other reason, "despite" this, makes you too much of a whore for me.
victor809 Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS wrote:
You've said some stupid sh*t... and that's quite possibly the stupidest. Nobody is "embracing racism". Jesus you're fxcking stupid.


Yes you are MACS. You don't even see it.
victor809 Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
As soon as an organization becomes militant in their efforts, and only a liar or a fool would say BLM hasn't, then they are a symbol of hate.

Tearing down statues is hate.
Attacking people who display "all lives matter" signs is hate.
And what's this BS about Mt. Rushmore?

BLM is going for style over substance. Using the "no publicity is bad" tactic.
And best of all? the media is complicit. Since day one they have shrugged away the looters and now the thugs as rouge outliers.





.....
What the absolute fuxk?

A brilliant argument. So you're saying an organized peaceful march of Nazis or KKK are not "symbols of hate" because they aren't tearing down statues or hitting anyone.

And the American Revolution was a symbol of hate because it destroyed property.

Fuxking brilliant.

Seriously tail... that couldn't possibly have made sense to you when you typed it.
victor809 Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tonygraz wrote:
We have taken that for granted for quite some time.


Yep. That's why I don't bother interacting with him
victor809 Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
I used to think



I'll take your word for that... but I don't remember a time when you did.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
teedubbya wrote:
BLM is not a symbol of hate.

That would depend on who you are, since their mission statement includes things like declaring war on the nuclear family...
opelmanta1900 Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
Black Lives Matter began as a call to action in response to state-sanctioned violence and anti-Black racism. Our intention from the very beginning was to connect Black people from all over the world who have a shared desire for justice to act together in their communities. The impetus for that commitment was, and still is, the rampant and deliberate violence inflicted on us by the state.

Enraged by the death of Trayvon Martin and the subsequent acquittal of his killer, George Zimmerman, and inspired by the 31-day takeover of the Florida State Capitol by POWER U and the Dream Defenders, we took to the streets. A year later, we set out together on the Black Lives Matter Freedom Ride to Ferguson, in search of justice for Mike Brown and all of those who have been torn apart by state-sanctioned violence and anti-Black racism. Forever changed, we returned home and began building the infrastructure for the Black Lives Matter Global Network, which, even in its infancy, has become a political home for many.

Ferguson helped to catalyze a movement to which we’ve all helped give life. Organizers who call this network home have ousted anti-Black politicians, won critical legislation to benefit Black lives, and changed the terms of the debate on Blackness around the world. Through movement and relationship building, we have also helped catalyze other movements and shifted culture with an eye toward the dangerous impacts of anti-Blackness.

These are the results of our collective efforts.

The Black Lives Matter Global Network is as powerful as it is because of our membership, our partners, our supporters, our staff, and you. Our continued commitment to liberation for all Black people means we are continuing the work of our ancestors and fighting for our collective freedom because it is our duty.

Every day, we recommit to healing ourselves and each other, and to co-creating alongside comrades, allies, and family a culture where each person feels seen, heard, and supported.

We acknowledge, respect, and celebrate differences and commonalities.

We work vigorously for freedom and justice for Black people and, by extension, all people.

We intentionally build and nurture a beloved community that is bonded together through a beautiful struggle that is restorative, not depleting.

We are unapologetically Black in our positioning. In affirming that Black Lives Matter, we need not qualify our position. To love and desire freedom and justice for ourselves is a prerequisite for wanting the same for others.

We see ourselves as part of the global Black family, and we are aware of the different ways we are impacted or privileged as Black people who exist in different parts of the world.

We are guided by the fact that all Black lives matter, regardless of actual or perceived sexual identity, gender identity, gender expression, economic status, ability, disability, religious beliefs or disbeliefs, immigration status, or location.

We make space for transgender brothers and sisters to participate and lead.

We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle cisgender privilege and uplift Black trans folk, especially Black trans women who continue to be disproportionately impacted by trans-antagonistic violence.

We build a space that affirms Black women and is free from sexism, misogyny, and environments in which men are centered.

We practice empathy. We engage comrades with the intent to learn about and connect with their contexts.

We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.

We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.

We foster a queer‐affirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise).

We cultivate an intergenerational and communal network free from ageism. We believe that all people, regardless of age, show up with the capacity to lead and learn.

We embody and practice justice, liberation, and peace in our engagements with one another.
victor809 Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
That would depend on who you are, since their mission statement includes things like declaring war on the nuclear family...


Really stretching there. What line is it that you're translating to "declare war on the nuclear family"?
is it "We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work."
or "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."

Because either is a really dumb take from you Opel. Note the "to the degree that.... are comfortable"?

victor809 Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
That would depend on who you are, since their mission statement includes things like declaring war on the nuclear family...


"We work vigorously for freedom and justice for Black people and, by extension, all people."
Oh MY GOD!!! THE HATE!!!! Trying to achieve justice for "all people". That's the last straw.
tailgater Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
.....
What the absolute fuxk?

A brilliant argument. So you're saying an organized peaceful march of Nazis or KKK are not "symbols of hate" because they aren't tearing down statues or hitting anyone.

And the American Revolution was a symbol of hate because it destroyed property.

Fuxking brilliant.

Seriously tail... that couldn't possibly have made sense to you when you typed it.


I know you're on a recent hate rant and want to stir things up.
Fine by me.
It's funny to watch you melt down like that.

But you don't even make any sense here.
Where did I say the KKK and nazis are OK?
You've taken an approach that is not only wrong, it's idiotic.

If I say that I like chocolate ice cream you can't assume I hate vanilla.

BLM rioting is hate.
KKK not rioting is still hate.

You moron.

tailgater Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
"We work vigorously for freedom and justice for Black people and, by extension, all people."
Oh MY GOD!!! THE HATE!!!! Trying to achieve justice for "all people". That's the last straw.




Ignore their looting.
Their violence.
Their blatant destruction of property.

Ignore it all.
Because they claim to work for justice.
Vigorously.

LOL!
victor809 Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
I know you're on a recent hate rant and want to stir things up.
Fine by me.
It's funny to watch you melt down like that.

But you don't even make any sense here.
Where did I say the KKK and nazis are OK?
You've taken an approach that is not only wrong, it's idiotic.

If I say that I like chocolate ice cream you can't assume I hate vanilla.

BLM rioting is hate.
KKK not rioting is still hate.

You moron.



Your logic (hahahaha!!) stated it. Your qualifications for a "hate group" is not the message they are trying to protest for. But the method of their protest.
If BLM is a hate group, in total, not based on their message or what they are trying to achieve, but rather because some property was destroyed, then by that logic a protest by a newly organized "Anti-jew, anti-black people Organization" (We'll call it Wag the Tailgater) will not be defined as a hate group, as long as they don't tear down monuments or loot or anything.

victor809 Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Ignore their looting.
Their violence.
Their blatant destruction of property.

Ignore it all.
Because they claim to work for justice.
Vigorously.

LOL!


There have been BLM protests for over 30 days now. In a row. Most of them peaceful.

Speyside Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Notice how Tail leaves out America and the American revolution. Based on exactly what he said they are a symbol of hate. Yet clearly they are not. His rhetoric is seriously flawed. It's easier to overlook than defend in this case. Though that is exactly what I expected him to do.
victor809 Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Speyside wrote:
Notice how Tail leaves out America and the American revolution. Based on exactly what he said they are a symbol of hate. Yet clearly they are not. His rhetoric is seriously flawed. It's easier to overlook than defend in this case. Though that is exactly what I expected him to do.


He's left out a lot to be honest.
We can start with trump being completely silent on white supremacist groups... literal nazis.... until he was pushed into an answer multiple times. But unbidden gives his opinion on the BLM movement...

Tail's take on modern history has been very similar. I can see how he likes bunker baby.
tailgater Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Your logic (hahahaha!!) stated it. Your qualifications for a "hate group" is not the message they are trying to protest for. But the method of their protest.
If BLM is a hate group, in total, not based on their message or what they are trying to achieve, but rather because some property was destroyed, then by that logic a protest by a newly organized "Anti-jew, anti-black people Organization" (We'll call it Wag the Tailgater) will not be defined as a hate group, as long as they don't tear down monuments or loot or anything.



Method of protest = burning, looting and violence.

You think they're still about the "message".

What a fool you are.
In every sense.


tailgater Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
He's left out a lot to be honest.
We can start with trump being completely silent on white supremacist groups... literal nazis.... until he was pushed into an answer multiple times. But unbidden gives his opinion on the BLM movement...

Tail's take on modern history has been very similar. I can see how he likes bunker baby.


When the conservatives start looting your neighborhood, give me a call.
Until then, you're just a triggered little snowflake.
In other words, nothing's changed.
victor809 Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Keep on thinking that tail. I'm sorry you were raised to be the person you are.
tailgater Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
I'd like to make myself clear. Because some of you have obviously tried to misread what I said earlier.

BLM is an organization that is using hate and fear as tactics to push a racist agenda.

"mostly peaceful" (as some brain dead media lemmings like to use) means nothing.
For instance:
"Golly. My neighbor was mostly peaceful. Until he blowed up that school bus full of kids."



BLM perpetuates HATE.
Sorry if that offends anyone.





tailgater Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Keep on thinking that tail. I'm sorry you were raised to be the person you are.



Of course you're sorry.
You hate anything that doesn't follow your media-inspired utiopia.

You upset? Was it your friend that died up in CHAZ?
Sorry to hear it. But that's what happens when you pal around with losers.
Or maybe it's your friend I should be telling that to.




tailgater Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Funny thing is, I agreed with the BLM movement. And I still agree with their original sentiment.

I just can't ignore their seismic shift towards violence.
And I'm disappointed that so many have been fooled by the media interpretation.


victor809 Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
I'd like to make myself clear. Because some of you have obviously tried to misread what I said earlier.

BLM is an organization that is using hate and fear as tactics to push a racist agenda.

"mostly peaceful" (as some brain dead media lemmings like to use) means nothing.
For instance:
"Golly. My neighbor was mostly peaceful. Until he blowed up that school bus full of kids."



BLM perpetuates HATE.
Sorry if that offends anyone.



There's a key phrase there. "Racist Agenda".

Opel kindly posted the agenda earlier. I'm glad to see that you consider that to be a "racist agenda".

The rest of your nonsense is irrelevant. Wouldn't matter if you said "BLM is an organization that uses puppies and cupcakes to push a racist agenda", or "BLM murders grandmothers to push a racist agenda". You believe the goal they are trying to achieve is racist.

You made yourself extraordinarily clear. It tells me exactly what a reprehensible person you are.
victor809 Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Of course you're sorry.
You hate anything that doesn't follow your media-inspired utiopia.

You upset? Was it your friend that died up in CHAZ?
Sorry to hear it. But that's what happens when you pal around with losers.
Or maybe it's your friend I should be telling that to.

drivel from a reprehensible person. Amusing because you try to imply friends of mine may be both dead and a loser....
I'm sorry you became the person you are.
victor809 Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Funny thing is, I agreed with the BLM movement. And I still agree with their original sentiment.

I just can't ignore their seismic shift towards violence.
And I'm disappointed that so many have been fooled by the media interpretation.




Don't walk that bull**** back. We saw your original statement.
A "seismic shift towards violence" is both incorrect and has zero to do with their "agenda" which you already called racist.

You can't say you agreed with the movement and that the movement has a racist agenda. Logic doesn't work that way.

Seriously... what a terribly reprehensible person. I'm glad I get to see this.
tailgater Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
There's a key phrase there. "Racist Agenda".

Opel kindly posted the agenda earlier. I'm glad to see that you consider that to be a "racist agenda".

The rest of your nonsense is irrelevant. Wouldn't matter if you said "BLM is an organization that uses puppies and cupcakes to push a racist agenda", or "BLM murders grandmothers to push a racist agenda". You believe the goal they are trying to achieve is racist.

You made yourself extraordinarily clear. It tells me exactly what a reprehensible person you are.


I'd be offended if I were able to think any less of you.
So there's that.

This tirade of yours is long overdue.
We've seen it before.
You've been banned more than once, I believe.

You going through the change?

victor809 Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
I'd be offended if I were able to think any less of you.
So there's that.

This tirade of yours is long overdue.
We've seen it before.
You've been banned more than once, I believe.

You going through the change?



Deflect, and I think pretend I'm transgender?
That also something you have a problem with?
tailgater Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Don't walk that bull**** back. We saw your original statement.
A "seismic shift towards violence" is both incorrect and has zero to do with their "agenda" which you already called racist.

You can't say you agreed with the movement and that the movement has a racist agenda. Logic doesn't work that way.

Seriously... what a terribly reprehensible person. I'm glad I get to see this.


Dude.
The BLM movement started as a timely and well intended cry for social justice.

It changed. Sorry if calling it a seismic shift confused you.
But when THEY change and I no longer agree with what they've become, that isn't "walking it back".

Man. You get so myopic when you're angry.

tailgater Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Deflect, and I think pretend I'm transgender?
That also something you have a problem with?


Wouldn't matter what I said on the matter. You've made up your pretty little mind.
Emphasis on little.

victor809 Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Dude.
The BLM movement started as a timely and well intended cry for social justice.

It changed. Sorry if calling it a seismic shift confused you.
But when THEY change and I no longer agree with what they've become, that isn't "walking it back".

Man. You get so myopic when you're angry.


The agenda has always been the same agenda. The one you called racist.

If you have evidence that it changed, prove it. I have no reason not to consider you to be an extraordinarily terrible person.
victor809 Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Wouldn't matter what I said on the matter. You've made up your pretty little mind.
Emphasis on little.



Yep. More deflection.
tailgater Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
drivel from a reprehensible person. Amusing because you try to imply friends of mine may be both dead and a loser....
I'm sorry you became the person you are.


If you read it carefully, it wasn't your friend I was calling the loser.

And truthfully? Anyone who willingly moved to the CHOP/CHAZ zone deserves whatever happened there.

Not wishing ill will to anyone. But not offering sympathy either.

tailgater Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
The agenda has always been the same agenda. The one you called racist.

If you have evidence that it changed, prove it. I have no reason not to consider you to be an extraordinarily terrible person.


When BLM began, they brought about public awareness to the injustices laid down upon people of color, especially the young men. It was compelling, and even though we "knew" about it already, we were forced by a conscience to remain focused.

And then the rallies turned to riots.
And the riots turned to violence.
Now they're using that law breaking adrenaline and momentum to systematically tear down public property.
General Lee? Some agreed it made sense.
Lincoln? Are you sheeting me?
Mt Rushmore? Don't be silly. They couldn't POSSIBLY want to remove that?

They are militant. They act with impunity. From the media. From politicians. From the law.
They attack anyone who doesn't embrace their beliefs. Physically. Social media. they want everyone who differs in belief to suffer.
That's not an agenda determined to right injustice. That's a manifesto to take what isn't theirs.
It's hate. Sorry if that offends you, but if it does then you better take off the blinders.



victor809 Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
When BLM began, they brought about public awareness to the injustices laid down upon people of color, especially the young men. It was compelling, and even though we "knew" about it already, we were forced by a conscience to remain focused.

And then the rallies turned to riots.
And the riots turned to violence.
Now they're using that law breaking adrenaline and momentum to systematically tear down public property.
General Lee? Some agreed it made sense.
Lincoln? Are you sheeting me?
Mt Rushmore? Don't be silly. They couldn't POSSIBLY want to remove that?

They are militant. They act with impunity. From the media. From politicians. From the law.
They attack anyone who doesn't embrace their beliefs. Physically. Social media. they want everyone who differs in belief to suffer.
That's not an agenda determined to right injustice. That's a manifesto to take what isn't theirs.
It's hate. Sorry if that offends you, but if it does then you better take off the blinders.


You are not describing an agenda.

You also aren't describing most of the BLM protests.

the agenda remained unchanged. It's written down in this fuxking thread if you bothered to read.

Just because it makes you feel better to think of it as a hate group doesn't make that true. It makes you a reprehensible person who is trying to justify it to himself. Who else are you even talking to? You don't actually ever believe anything I say, so clearly you wouldn't be trying to justify it to me.

I think it's funny, because you've always tried to claim you never liked trump. But at his worst levels and weakest excuses, you seem to align perfectly with him.
Speyside Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Tails commentary is actually very Trumpian. There is no critical thought which leads to massive inconsistency. Also his commentary absolutly appears to have an agenda. Finally his commentary makes no attempt to address the root problem. Trump likes people like Tail and some others here.
teedubbya Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I think tail won this one. He declared it and stuf. Victor didn’t declare things enough.
victor809 Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
I think tail won this one. He declared it and stuf. Victor didn’t declare things enough.


true true... that is the cbid law.
delta1 Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,788
we've had a month of peaceful BLM protests in cities all across the USA...that is the heart of the BLM movement, still peacefully calling attention to social injustice and inequality...after seven years, they've barely moved the needle....until now?

after the fires, looting and destruction during the first week or so of the protests, there's scant media attention now, so, no, the media is not their partner...

at the start, fringe elements, outsiders and criminals did the thuggish destructive stuff under the cover of protests...they have largely disappeared and are slowly being identified and arrested...not a lot of media coverage of this either...

but from the con media, led by our POTUS, BLM is a hate group of thugs and terrorists...

it seems that Americans are following the example of the POTUS, and are becoming less tolerant of blacks and minorities who speak out about societal ills that adversely impact them, demonizing them so that they can ignore the racial divide that is an insidious wound to our nation's soul that needs to heal...

One Nation, under God, with Liberty and Justice for All..................................................mere words or our promise to each other?
Whistlebritches Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,128
tonygraz wrote:
We have taken that for granted for quite some time.



victor809 wrote:
Yep. That's why I don't bother interacting with him



So without even knowing me and just because I disagree with you I'm racist.Tony I would say you're just a misguided follower.Vic you're nothing but a schit stirrer using an abundance of words actually saying very little if anything.


I don't care what either or any of you think for that matter.I'm betting I'm the only person in this conversation to have taken in a black homeless boy at 14 and raise him through HS graduation.His dad and I were very close friends through high school but he turned into an alcoholic,the childs mother a drug addict.My best friend here locally is black.they farmed just down the road from us when I was a child.James and I have been hanging out for over 50 years.My family is a mix of Asian,Mexican,black and white.Before the pandemic we broke bread together quite frequently.Our table conversations have no limits,disagreements are few and far between and all of us being adults we can agree to disagree and still leave the table loving each other.


Both of you just continue to do what your type does best.........cast labels onto those that differ with you.It shows your open minded nature and rosy disposition.
teedubbya Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I hope we just put this whole Trump debacle behind us. I understand the initial desperation but it’s a disaster. Our choice is pretty limited now. Let’s just treat Biden like Gerald Ford and take our choices more seriously in 4 years. We can’t do this anymore. It was worth a try to some. It is no longer.
victor809 Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
You're an optimist tw... I'm pretty sure there is a significant portion of our population that is happy with his performance to date.

Given that he's completely bungled the pandemic and is doing nothing about his best buddy taking contracts out on our troops, it makes you wonder what it is that they think he's doing so well. Which leads us to the "BLM" is hate speech. It's what they want and he is doubling down on it. It may even be enough to get him a second term.
Speyside Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
It isn't over till it's over. Act like Biden is 10 or 12 points behind in the polls. Support, motivate, do your part, every day. Remind young people how important their votes are and that it is imperative that they vote. It isn't just about beating Trump, it is about so much more. It is about taking back the senate. It is about strengthening control of the house. It is about crushing his supporters aspirations. It is about putting supremacists, racists, bigots, and all their ilk back into their proper place of evil outcast. It is about taking back America.
tailgater Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
You are not describing an agenda.

You also aren't describing most of the BLM protests.

the agenda remained unchanged. It's written down in this fuxking thread if you bothered to read.

Just because it makes you feel better to think of it as a hate group doesn't make that true. It makes you a reprehensible person who is trying to justify it to himself. Who else are you even talking to? You don't actually ever believe anything I say, so clearly you wouldn't be trying to justify it to me.

I think it's funny, because you've always tried to claim you never liked trump. But at his worst levels and weakest excuses, you seem to align perfectly with him.


BLM has become a terrorist organization.

It's obvious you agree with their mob mentality. Maybe it makes you feel safe. And un-triggered. Woke.
I don't like thugs.
If being against all that makes me reprehensible, then I'll wear it proudly.

And thank you for bringing up Trump.
It's like you're my puppet and I made you do that.
So predictable.
And full of TDS.
Among other stuff.

victor809 Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
BLM has become a terrorist organization.

It's obvious you agree with their mob mentality. Maybe it makes you feel safe. And un-triggered. Woke.
I don't like thugs.
If being against all that makes me reprehensible, then I'll wear it proudly.

And thank you for bringing up Trump.
It's like you're my puppet and I made you do that.
So predictable.
And full of TDS.
Among other stuff.


Terrorists.
A bunch of people marching for equal treatment of blacks by police are terrorists.

Wow. You are scared of something.
But yes, you are reprehensible.
delta1 Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,788
I kinda see tail's point of view:

libs see a clear connection between white supremacists embracing Trump and his supporters and that Trump, who isn't a racist, notices the affinity so he throws out stuff naturally suited to feed them: "white power" etc

cons see black, brown and white arsonists, looters and vandals during the first week or so of the BLM protests against police brutality and social inequality, and assume they are part of the fabric of the BLM movement that has continued to protest publicly for more than another month without any of that destructive criminal conduct...
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12