America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 weeks ago by Sunoverbeach. 217 replies replies.
5 Pages<12345
January 6th Committee - Trumps 7 Part Plan
Brewha Offline
#201 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 10,761
They showed the committee testimony on Fox News and lost half a million viewers.

Trump could shoot a man in the streets an the MAGA crowd would still suck his deak.
Brewha Offline
#202 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 10,761
Macs, got any vids of the MAGA peeps swallowing Trumps chain?

I mean beyond what you have posted….
RayR Offline
#203 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 5,885
Another COVID victim.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#204 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 11,736
My mom said that if I don't get off my computer and do my homework she'll slam my head on the keyboard, but I think she's jokinfjreoiwjrtwe4to8rkljreun8f4ny84c8y4t58lym4wthylmhawt4mylt4amlathn
Burner02 Offline
#205 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,456
MACS wrote:
Saying it doesn't make it true. See: Adam Schiff.

Where's the evidence?



If Schiff is involved, it is not on the up and up. I'm still waiting on all of his Russia, Russia, Russia, hoax evidence that never saw the light of day.

Can anyone explain why the Jan 6 spectacle is referred to as a hearing when in fact it is a presentation. I have yet to see any real due process. If due process was a thing for the presentation, someone might ask Nancy Pelosi why her Capital Police were not prepared for Jan 6. Or why did she turn down the 20,000 National Guard troops offered up by then President Trump. As well as why did she turn the capital into Ft Pelosi for months when there were no credible threats at a cost of many millions to us taxpayers.

And leave it to the Dems to trot in a female Lt Col Alexander Vindman to save the day. Nothing like hearsay to clarify the situation.

rfenst Offline
#206 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 36,799
frankj1 wrote:
there were things she said she said she had been told by others, like the steering wheel grab, and things she said she witnessed/heard in person.

What others said to her and she repeated in testimony is hearsay.

But, that doesn't automatically make it untrue. There are more than 20 exceptions to hearsay that can make hearsay credible testimony.

Things considered include the timing, circumstances and how the person obtained the hearsay they testified to. Then the listener gives it whatever weight he or she wants to.

It's up to each person to decide what to believe based on the circumstances of how and when she learned what she testified to.

Edited-
rfenst Offline
#207 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 36,799
HockeyDad wrote:
Jailing the opposition heading into an election is an important part of establishing election integrity.

Bidden could pardon him (like Ford did Nixon).
But, Trump won't be our next President anyway. Desantis will be.
Trump's just not on-board with it yet...
HockeyDad Offline
#208 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 43,464
rfenst wrote:
What others said to her and she conveys to others is considered hearsay. But, that doesn't automatically make it untrue. There are 30-some odd exceptions to hearsay. It's like swiss cheese. Everything gets considered including statements of fact made by others. It's up to each person to decide what to believe.


When does the defense get to present its case?
Burner02 Offline
#209 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,456
rfenst wrote:
What others said to her and she conveys to others is considered hearsay. But, that doesn't automatically make it untrue.


And of course, it does not automatically make it true.

But Schiff wants everyone to believe her because she is an honest person. He has said as much in an aired interview.


Burner02 Offline
#210 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,456
HockeyDad wrote:
When does the defense get to present its case?



They don't, it is a presentation.
Speyside2 Offline
#211 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,045
A honest question. No less no more. Who would the defense be defending? If this was to lead to any indictments, then there would be individual defendants.
rfenst Offline
#212 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 36,799
HockeyDad wrote:
When does the defense get to present its case?

Whenever it wants to.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#213 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 52,194
Speyside2 wrote:
A honest question. No less no more. Who would the defense be defending? If this was to lead to any indictments, then there would be individual defendants.


There is no defense and just like the impeachments and the Russia Russia Russia debacle...it's a bunch of crap. America sat by while BLM torched cities, police were injured, businesses closed and our sitting VP advocated for the release and bail money for those offenders. Contrast this with the "insurrection" and it's laughable. Everything I knew about it stopped and started with the President offering up the National Guard and signed papers detailing it. Pelosi and the DC mayor stood down. You can find countless videos off Capitol police opening doors, removing barricades, talking with/posing for pics with the "insurrection" and refusing to call in more assistance. Letting Shifty Schiff anywhere near this shows me all I needed to know. Remember, he's the guy that said he had the goods on Trump and well...

Adam Schiff is at it again. Once again he claims he has evidence against former President Trump in the January 6 farce.


Excuse my skepticism, but Adam Schiff always has “evidence”, when it comes to Trump. I’m still waiting to see the overwhelming evidence Schiff claimed to have against Trump in the now completely debunked Russian collusion story.

As for J6, Schiff goes farther. His evidence is reportedly “very powerful”. This can only mean that Schiff will be not just hard-pressed to show this evidence, but will be “very hard-pressed” to reveal his evidence.

Not one to limit his hyperbole, Schiff claims that his evidence could allow the January 6 Farce to present charges against President Trump. Sure. Just like the Russian collusion evidence Schiff has failed to produce.

The art of the tease:

As Schiff did for over a year in the Russian collusion lie, he oft repeated the claim of “damning” or “overwhelming” evidence against Trump. Meanwhile, to this day he has yet to produce any. And like in the Russian collusion lie, Schiff commented to reporters:

“And we’ll be presenting what we’ve found. I don’t want to predetermine or prejudge the strength of what we will show you. We’ll show you what we’ve been able to determine.” In other words, Schiff has nothing.


Schiff made his comments, despite Trump saying he offered to deploy 20,000 National Guards ahead of the protest. President Trump declared that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (R-Calif.) rejected his offer.

If this farce were legitimate, Democrats would admit this and end the charade. But they are forced to pretend that an “insurrection” occurred.

Jim Jordan reminded people of Schiff’s previous deception:

“Well I don’t think we learnt anything new,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). “I mean, we already knew that they want to get rid of the electoral college, they want to make it so that President Trump can’t run in 2024…I don’t think we learned anything new, even with hundreds of witnesses, thousands of hours of testimony, no ability for Republicans to do any type of cross examination.”

Still, some Democrats are on the edge of their seats, waiting for this evidence to materialize. Meanwhile, the rest of the Democrats are well-aware of the farce. They’re just hoping they can help make Schiff’s claims seem legit long enough to pick their next “winner”.

https://theblacksphere.net/2022/06/shifty-schiffs-latest-claim-real-evidence-on-trump/



So, are you a believer that's aware of the game or on the edge of your seat hoping it won't be the constant let down that's Adam Schiff?
HockeyDad Offline
#214 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 43,464
rfenst wrote:
Whenever it wants to.


It that in the second season of the show?
rfenst Offline
#215 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 36,799
HockeyDad wrote:
It that in the second season of the show?

They can start now, but it will probably occur during the second season.
Brewha Offline
#216 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 10,761
Does DMV giving the MAGA crowd an on line hand job count as reality TV?


Asking for a friend….
Sunoverbeach Offline
#217 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 11,736
I saw a sign that said "Watch for children" and I thought, "That sounds like a fair trade".
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345