America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 months ago by Palama. 55 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
"Myth" of Muscle Cars
delta1 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,814
we who have a buncha years under our belts fondly remember the heyday of the American Muscle Cars...mid 60's to early '70's...cars with big and noisy V8's, like the Mustangs, Chevelles, GTOs, Camaros, Barracudas, Dusters, Chargers, Challengers, Firebirds, Cutlasses and Road Runners...among several others


My memories seem to have amplified the performance of these classic beasts. I fondly and hazily "remember" 0-60 times of about 5.5 seconds and 1/4 mile times of about 13.8 seconds produced by my 1970 Road Runner with a 383 V-8. I always thought it was the fastest car I ever owned.


I came across some numbers from the muscle car era, and discovered my memories were influenced by the herbs we smoked back in our high school and college days. According to the Automoblie Catalog, the '70 Road Runner with a factory 383 C.I. V8 ran 0-60mph in 6.2 seconds and 1/4 mile in 14.7 seconds...times that were derided as run by "slugs" back in the day.

Heck, I have a 2009 Mazdaspeed3 with a 2.3 Turbo. It is rated by that same publication as running 0-60mph in 5.9 seconds and can do a 1/4 mile in 14.2 seconds. This modern "sporty" economy car with an engine about 1/3 the size of the '70 Road Runner would leave that 50 year old muscle car "slug" in the dust.

I'm thinking that my memories were fogged by the performance of those muscle cars that had bigger engines, with more horsepower and had been modified for the track. And the back seat wrestling matches...

And you can't beat the deep throated sound of a big V-8 in full growl rocketing down the strip!

DrafterX Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
Wish I still had my Camaro, Firebird & Fairlane.. Sad
Sunoverbeach Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,675
I've come across similar articles. Basically a modern minivan could take out a lot of the fastest muscle from back then.

The coolness disparity though, can not be measured with current available technology
Palama Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2013
Posts: 23,735
I still have Seller's Remorse over selling my fixed-up '68 Road Runner to my older brother to pay off a debt I owed him. But, the rose-colored rearview mirror lookback is just that, nostalgia at its finest. While I did LOVE the sound of the motor, the franking Gs created when you pedal'd to the metal, the smell of burned rubber and gasoline, and all those things that made muscle cars "better" in our youthful minds, I don't think I would want one today unless I hit the MegaBuck$ in Vegas and had more money than sense. But, iffin' I did, it would be retro-mod'd with EFI, 4-wheel disk brakes, ABS, A/C, power windows and lower gearing (3:73 instead of 3:91) and of course, stored in a secured facility.

KingoftheCove Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-08-2011
Posts: 7,644
Not muscle cars, but…

i had a 65 Mustang, convertible.
Had the straight-6, 3 speed with a 200, that produced a whopping 120hp.
It was a dog. Not quite a POS, but close.
Leaky roof, noisy drive train, crappy stick shift that you had to hold in place in 2nd gear, etc

I later owned a 68 Barracuda coupe, with the slant-6, 225 automatic.
I LOVED that car. Ultra reliable, decent mpg, plenty of power, handled nice…
Should have never sold it, but was offered almost $2000 more than I paid for it……..and I just had my first child……so…
tonygraz Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,288
Loved my '69 Ford Torino Cobra. Got it special order with a 4 speed and 390 gears. Could beat just about everything else on the road, but it was hard to get past gas stations. 4-6 MPG.
MACS Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,833
Judging the super cars of yesterday by today's standards... don't fit, does it?

Times change. Technology changes. People change. fog

Edit: Speaking of technology changes... SUSPENSION! Those cars were great in a straight line. Giant bag of buttholes in a corner.
Gene363 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,844
Some good comments.

I always liked cars that could corner or off-road vehicles.

The first time I drove a car with a decent fuel injection system I never wanted another carbonator. No pumping the accelerator to get it running, no cold stalling, flooding, or the smell of raw gasoline.

The final epiphany was the change from a 1980 Corvette to a 1993 Corvette. No carbonation, excellent fuel mileage, excellent power, was relatively quiet, road very smoothly on carbon fiber springs, and cornered like it was glued to the road.
deadeyedick Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,124
[quote=MACS]Judging the super cars of yesterday by today's standards... don't fit, does it?


Yup. Try judging them next to the pre-V8 cars of just 10-12 years earlier. They were hot and each had their own style. Today they all look the same and even the modern V8's sound like like a can full of rocks instead of that rumble they had.

When the GTO hit the market I was driving VW bug and wishing I could afford gas for it. As far as ownership goes I missed the era completely.

Since then, I have owned a '69 Chevelle SS 396 (350hp) , '41 Ford truck hot rod (355HP), and currently a '65 Corvette coupe (350 HP). Of course most any modern car can have more HP and drivability but they will soon be surpassed by electrics.

We are actually in a modern era of muscle cars that will soon end. You can go out today and buy a car that comes with anywhere from 700 to over 1000 HP and is capable of daily driver manners.

So it goes.
tonygraz Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,288
You just reminded me that I also had a GTO - blue with white interior. Blew up 2 motors in that one. Never met a Pontiac that didn't blow an engine or tranny.
DrafterX Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
tonygraz wrote:
You just reminded me that I also had a GTO - blue with white interior. Blew 2 trannys in that one. Never met a tranny that I didn't blow.



freak... Mellow
Mr. Jones Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,445
Had a 69' /350/ orange /4 speed shift Camaro w" 2 white stripes hood and trunk w/ air fin on trunk...for 4 yrs..
Shoulda kept it.
Palama Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2013
Posts: 23,735
deadeyedick wrote:
[quote=MACS]Judging the super cars of yesterday by today's standards... don't fit, does it?


Yup. Try judging them next to the pre-V8 cars of just 10-12 years earlier. They were hot and each had their own style. Today they all look the same and even the modern V8's sound like like a can full of rocks instead of that rumble they had.

When the GTO hit the market I was driving VW bug and wishing I could afford gas for it. As far as ownership goes I missed the era completely.

Since then, I have owned a '69 Chevelle SS 396 (350hp) , '41 Ford truck hot rod (355HP), and currently a '65 Corvette coupe (350 HP). Of course most any modern car can have more HP and drivability but they will soon be surpassed by electrics.

We are actually in a modern era of muscle cars that will soon end. You can go out today and buy a car that comes with anywhere from 700 to over 1000 HP and is capable of daily driver manners.

So it goes.


Rose-colored look back has me missing some of the people I used to hang out with during my RR days. Whenever someone was doing something to their car, we’d gather in his garage, lend a hand, sometimes good, sometimes unneeded “advice”, and in general, just hang. Granted, I didn’t necessarily care for everyone but there were a few that became good friends long after we sold our cars.

Gene363 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,844
tonygraz wrote:
You just reminded me that I also had a GTO - blue with white interior. Blew up 2 motors in that one. Never met a Pontiac that didn't blow an engine or tranny.


LOL
BuckyB93 Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,227
This brings me back to my childhood. Growing up, a neighbor family about 3 houses down lived couple grease monkeys. Lars and Glen Gustufsson, (no lie, I couldn't couldn't invent a more Nordic name). They towered over 6 feet in stature.

They would buy cars at auction and fix them up and flip them. Doing the mechanical work, body work and painting all in their garage. I remember them doing a Mustang, Chevelle, Firebird (Smokey and the Bandit), Duster, Camaro... among others. Also in the neighborhood was a guy, Carl, that made a living on rebuilding carburetors.

If anyone in the neighborhood that had car problems... just call the Gustufssons and/or Carl. Pay for the parts and a case of beer for labor.

It was fun growing up with some grease monkeys as neghibors.
tonygraz Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,288
Bucky, I have a Gustavson neighbor down the street. Also my little town now has an electric bike store with a showroom downtown.
deadeyedick Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,124
BuckyB93 wrote:
This brings me back to my childhood. Growing up, a neighbor family about 3 houses down lived couple grease monkeys. Lars and Glen Gustufsson, (no lie, I couldn't couldn't invent a more Nordic name). They towered over 6 feet in stature.

They would buy cars at auction and fix them up and flip them. Doing the mechanical work, body work and painting all in their garage. I remember them doing a Mustang, Chevelle, Firebird (Smokey and the Bandit), Duster, Camaro... among others. Also in the neighborhood was a guy, Carl, that made a living on rebuilding carburetors.

If anyone in the neighborhood that had car problems... just call the Gustufssons and/or Carl. Pay for the parts and a case of beer for labor.

It was fun growing up with some grease monkeys as neghibors.


Reminds me of three brothers I went to grade school and high school with. Harold, Darrell and Larry Christopherson. All were big, mean and red headed and would fight with anybody they could find. Iffn they couldn't find anybody they fought each other constantly. Their father worked for the railroad and was killed on the job in some sort of accident when they were young and at age 18 they each were given a large inheritance.

Larry, my age, took his money and immediately bought a funny car, one of the first in Arizona. He ran it for a couple of years in Az and the Southern California tracks. At that time I was part of a rat trap '55 Chevy gasser team (driver mainly) and we raced at Beeline Dragway near Phoenix. He went totally broke within a few years. Haven't heard from them since about 1970s.
BuckyB93 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,227
Christopherson you say? Wonder if they are related to me in some sort of broken branch of the family tree. Most people can't figure out how to spell my last name without some guidance.

Are you sure Larry and Darrell don't have another brother named Darrell?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGCiVolMPZ0
BuckyB93 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,227
NINE! teen.
MACS Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,833
My friend from HS... Mike Tamaro... got a 1970 Pontiac Grand Prix from his grandma. Dark blue, white interior. I have no idea what engine it had, but it was a fkn chick magnet.

But the memory I have is sitting across from a church after work one night... in the parking lot, smokin' a doobie... cop comes up and knocks on the window. Mike's bag is sitting on the console. Mine is tucked into my undies where it should be.

Cop dumps Mike's bag on the ground, rubs it in with his foot, and tells us to GTFO before he changes his mind.

Moral of the story... keep your weed in your pants, dumbass.
DrafterX Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
I heard weed is a gateway drug... Mellow
MACS Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,833
DrafterX wrote:
I heard weed is a gateway drug... Mellow



Erroneous! Booze is the original gateway drug.
BuckyB93 Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,227
I'd have to side with MACS on that assessment. Might even toss is cigarettes too. (I differentiate tobacco from cigarettes, cigs have more addictive chemicals in them than natural tobacco)
DrafterX Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
Well, that's what Wheel said... I think I'm gonna visit his favorite cigar bar in a couple weeks... He supposedly still has a vault there...Herfing
Krazeehorse Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
Sunoverbeach wrote:
I've come across similar articles. Basically a modern minivan could take out a lot of the fastest muscle from back then.

The coolness disparity though, can not be measured with current available technology

And handle better too. But my odyssey doesn’t sound nearly as bad as my 69 Mach with headers.
Abrignac Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,329
Had a ‘78 Vette, and an early ‘70’s Grand Prix, but my favorite was the hand-me- down ‘78 Buick Electra 225. Called it the Brown Hound. Could easily sit 4 across in front, 5 in the back if a couple were skinny. Had many a keg parties next to wherever I decided to park since I could easily fit a keg iced down in a half of a 55 gallon barrel in the trunk. Best part was that the back seat was damn near the size of a twin bed. Could do the horizontal hustle without being cramped.
J&K11 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 08-20-2021
Posts: 55
who makes a minivan that runs 0-60 in 5 seconds? Sounds like a fish story.
DrafterX Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
My Explorer will do 0-60 in 5.8... Mellow
deadeyedick Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,124
On a related note the new, and last, hemi Challenger called the 170, with 1025 HP is projected to do 0-60 in 1.8. Comes out later this year.
BuckyB93 Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,227
^ Damn, 1025 horsepower? That will give you whiplash.
Palama Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2013
Posts: 23,735
deadeyedick wrote:
On a related note the new, and last, hemi Challenger called the 170, with 1025 HP is projected to do 0-60 in 1.8. Comes out later this year.


And there’ll be some collectors who’ll over, overpay so they can drive it once then park it in their warehouse and brag that they have one. d'oh!
rfenst Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,368
I had a '69 Cutlas Supreme in the late seventies, with a 350ci engine, quadrajet carburetor and black vinyl bucket seats. Pea green exterior. Ugly as $hit, but I used to be able to smoke the tires and getting to 120 was real easy with more pedal left to go.

My Mom had a Cadillac Sedan de Ville with a 425ci. Slow off the line, but super fast after first gear and at higher speeds

Had a couple Honda v-6 Accord sedans and such that have moved very well.

I also had a brand new, factory supped-up, Volvo S80 with a turbocharged six-cylinder and electronic stick shift (no clutch). Faster than all of them. Smooth as a jet. But, I never quite got it over 100, although there was plenty of pedal left.
MACS Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,833
1974 Buick Riviera Classic with a 455. Wasn't fast, but it was a tank. Would spin tires.

Wasn't mine, was my mom's, but I drove it.
Brewha Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Muscle cars seemed to always stand on the line of myth and facts - depending on what you thought they were.

I remember so may cars in the '70s that could shred tires and had big numbers and cool names for their motors - but they were only fast compared to the cars of the day. And even then only in a straight. In those day you were fast in a straight line, or fast around curves - pretty much nobody did both.

I traded my 1970 Malibu 350 for a 1976 280z. I lost about a second 0-60, but I could out run anybody around the block.

It wasn't until I bought a '88 Vett with a manual trans that I could do both - go fast and turn...
It was the fastest car - all around - anyone ever rode in. Back in the day.
That car did 0-60 in about 6 seconds and ran the quarter in 14 and change. These numbers are a joke by todays standards.

Today a V6 puts down power like and old V8. The 4 bangers are balls on fast. And some of the fastest of the fast are electric.



Today, "muscle cars" are an anachronism, not a myth.

burning_sticks Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 08-17-2020
Posts: 152
Brewha wrote:
Muscle cars seemed to always stand on the line of myth and facts - depending on what you thought they were.

I remember so may cars in the '70s that could shred tires and had big numbers and cool names for their motors - but they were only fast compared to the cars of the day. And even then only in a straight. In those day you were fast in a straight line, or fast around curves - pretty much nobody did both.

I traded my 1970 Malibu 350 for a 1976 280z. I lost about a second 0-60, but I could out run anybody around the block.

It wasn't until I bought a '88 Vett with a manual trans that I could do both - go fast and turn...
It was the fastest car - all around - anyone ever rode in. Back in the day.
That car did 0-60 in about 6 seconds and ran the quarter in 14 and change. These numbers are a joke by todays standards.

Today a V6 puts down power like and old V8. The 4 bangers are balls on fast. And some of the fastest of the fast are electric.



Today, "muscle cars" are an anachronism, not a myth.


Finally some common ground, my 280Z had the 160 MPH speedometer buried many, many times. Front and rear radar detectors when I ran the interstate, dropped those when I took it to Germany.
delta1 Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,814
a few European sports cars of the 70's and 80's, like Porsches and Aston Martins, could go fast on straights and handled well on curvy roads...only American car that came close was the Corvette...

gas crisis and consumption regs, along with air quality/exhaust regs, retarded the production of performance cars in America in the 70's and 80's...
Sunoverbeach Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,675
It was a dark time for the American people
deadeyedick Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,124
Sunoverbeach wrote:
It was a dark time for the American people


Known as the Malaise era due to a combination of government fuel mandates and shoddy products coming from American auto makers.
Brewha Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
burning_sticks wrote:
Finally some common ground, my 280Z had the 160 MPH speedometer buried many, many times. Front and rear radar detectors when I ran the interstate, dropped those when I took it to Germany.

Would love to hear about it.

I put a header on and sway bars. And the widest tires/wheels that would fit (just barely) - went from 70 series tires to 60's - was a big deal in the day. Sky blue.

Always wanted a 77 or 78 cause of the 5 speed and hood louvers.....never got one.
Brewha Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
delta1 wrote:
a few European sports cars of the 70's and 80's, like Porsches and Aston Martins, could go fast on straights and handled well on curvy roads...only American car that came close was the Corvette...

gas crisis and consumption regs, along with air quality/exhaust regs, retarded the production of performance cars in America in the 70's and 80's...


We used to joke about Porsche paranoia - The guys who owned one were afraid to drive them.

The Corvettes from 1982 and back were not the best handling - or powerful. But in 1994, they really fixed the chassis. Then the search for affordable power began.....
Oddly though, I always wanted an 82, just cause of the look.
DrafterX Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,564
Drove a RX-7 for awhile.. never did a road trip but it was great around OKC... fast off the line and in the corners... Mellow
Gene363 Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,844
DrafterX wrote:
Drove a RX-7 for awhile.. never did a road trip but it was great around OKC... fast off the line and in the corners... Mellow


I drove a 1993 RX-7, it was a light weight semi-racing version(?). It had twin turbochargers and ran like a scaled cat. Unfortunately, I had to drive it barefoot and even then the peddles were too damm close and the seat didn't go back far enough to be comfortable.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,675
Should've kept them. 90s era RX-7s are going for like $60-70k nowadays. 80s versions significantly less
Gene363 Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,844
Sunoverbeach wrote:
Should've kept them. 90s era RX-7s are going for like $60-70k nowadays. 80s versions significantly less


Speaking of hindsight... when I bought the 1980 corvette in Houston, they had a Ford GT40. It was only $18k more than the corvette... coulda, shoulda woulda... d'oh!
deadeyedick Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,124
Gene363 wrote:
Speaking of hindsight... when I bought the 1980 corvette in Houston, they had a Ford GT40. It was only $18k more than the corvette... coulda, shoulda woulda... d'oh!


Speaking of which.... When I was in 1st two years of college I drove a 1959 MGA. The English car dealer in town was Flint British Motors where I bought parts. They had the only 289 Cobra I had ever seen in their showroom and IIRC it was selling for about $7500. They now go for $1.1 -$1.5M. d'oh!

Tried unsuccessfully to get the salesman to let me take it for a test drive.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,675
Saw a Mecum auction a while back where the bid for an original Cobra got up to $4.5m

Did not meet the reserve

Think it might have been one of the 427s though
Gene363 Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,844
deadeyedick wrote:
Speaking of which.... When I was in 1st two years of college I drove a 1959 MGA. The English car dealer in town was Flint British Motors where I bought parts. They had the only 289 Cobra I had ever seen in their showroom and IIRC it was selling for about $7500. They now go for $1.1 -$1.5M. d'oh!

Tried unsuccessfully to get the salesman to let me take it for a test drive.


I feel your pain. Brick wall
deadeyedick Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,124
Sunoverbeach wrote:
Saw a Mecum auction a while back where the bid for an original Cobra got up to $4.5m

Did not meet the reserve

Think it might have been one of the 427s though


There are a few with special attributes like racing history or ownership that can make the price go way up. The one you saw might have been the one personally owned by Carroll Shelby?
Sunoverbeach Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,675
That's a distinct possibility. There was some yapping in the lounge, so I didn't catch details. Plus my mind may have fritzed just a bit when I saw the numbahs
streetrod Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 08-16-2007
Posts: 2,110
Back on 1966 I bought a brand new Chevelle SS396/325 HP. Within a few weeks it was made into the 375 HP version of the motor. It was my every day car but was also my street racer & drag strip car. With some tweaking & some aftermarket parts (suspension, headers, slicks), I was running a consistent 12.7 seconds in the 1/4 miles at around 105 MPH. This was a pretty good time for those days.
Today I Cruz in my 1965 Corvette with 425 HP ( my avatar is my Vette motor) or my 55 Chevy with only 350 HP.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>