Allowing business to operate while the toxin levels are reduced is the best realistic solution.
Creating unrealistic goals only serves to close facilities and raise prices on many things, including energy sources.
How do you suppose your elderly will pay their heating bills when the prices skyrocket?
I knew my post was from a biased source, but the author has credentials. Can the same be said for a left wing group that opposes everything related to fossil fuels?
The sierra club is half a notch above greenpeace, which makes Karl Marx look consevative.
As Christy Whitman recently said on Letterman: " you know you're doing things right when BOTH sides sue you equally"..