America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by Homebrew. 62 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
A grim outlook of the future
65gtoman Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Im sorry about that Rick, it won’t happen again, you have my word. I just got frustrated, I just want to know the answers to these questions, become more in tune with the people around me and on this board. Yelling is not going to work, we all need to work together. A house divided can not stand.


RICKAMAVEN Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
65gtoman

i don't know about other liberals. i have never been to a liberal meeting and i don't know their secret handshake.

i think the corporations in this country have too much control over the laws we make. a corporation exsists to hide assets and make money. the stockholders are suppossed to reap the rewards of the profits, but the board of directors, almost always voted in by proxy, have little if any ownership in the company. the fact that they can vote themselves huge benifits, mostly money, is why some one like ken lay, a personal friend of the president, can steal the treasure of the company from the pension funds, and anything else stealable, like all the paper clips and scotch tape.

i think it is common knowledge that smoking cigarettes will kill you. we the people have not been proteced by our government from this carcinogen. we have not been warned until just recently, thanks to a small group of dedicated people. we know the corporate heads lied to congress. we know the levels of nicotine have been altered to make a more addictive product. cigarettes are not classified as a food or a drug, so no government body can investigate them.

i personally don't care if someone want to smoke cigarettes, that is in fact their business, but these people have been seduced, like children in a school yard, into believing they are using a safe product that will not harm them or addict them.

i believe these are a few of the things liberals agree on.

i don't know, remember i don't even know their secret handshake.
65gtoman Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Rick let me ask you this, you said homeland security. we've never had it.

Ok, but there never has been a repeat of 9/11 yet, so somebody must be doing something right one would think?

The anthrax in the mail is gone too. I feel safer now then on 9/11


65gtoman Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Also, why don’t liberals like the patriot act? I think that’s whats keeping us from a repeat of 9/11.


That’s something I can’t understand, seems like a good idea to me. Whats wrong with it?
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
65gtoman

the patriot act was passed by the congress and the senate without even reading it, no less discusing it.

the name was well chosen by ashcroft.

before this "act" we were protected against unresonable search and seizure, unless you happenned to be black. we were safe in our homes. our phones were not tapped without a court order requested from a judge with adequate reasons for the request. attourney-client privilege existed. yuou as a person could not be spied on, least of all in your church.

the patriot act gives the justice department, john ashcroft, unrestricted access to any one at any time.

here is one website that will give you a better understanding of the dangers

http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/04.02A.JVB.Patriot.htm
65gtoman Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Im glad im not a Black Muslim I give you that, but its working, some may be offended but its keeping from a repeat 9/11. Im sure they don’t track every black guy in the country, just ones with an Islam Muslim back ground. It’s not that bad, I feel if we didn’t do it, bad things would happen.


But do you have any better ideas that won’t offend anyone, im all for change if there is a better way.
I don’t want to trade the car in today but wait 2weeks for my new car, you know what I mean? There needs to be a better plan before we toss out the one we have. If we didn’t tap people’s phone etc, we couldn’t find out what going on, until it happens. I guess that’s what im trying to say.
65gtoman Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Also, I would like to know you some of you liberals think about articles like this one. Would you agree with anything in here?


Anti-war Protesters Border on Treason
Wilson C. Lucom
Tuesday, April 1, 2003
Some of the anti-war protesters are unpatriotic and disloyal, and their actions border on treason.
Anti-war demonstrators can demonstrate legally and peacefully all they want when there is no war. However, when war starts, all Americans must unite behind the president and the troops so that the U.S. will not be hampered by these protesters creating negative, uninformed public opinion against the president, thereby harming the war effort of the troops.
The president and the secretary of defense are the only ones who actually know what is happening and what will occur in the future in the war. The protesters and the rest of the people just do not have this same information and cannot make informed, accurate judgments on the progress of the war or how to fight this war.
When they "Monday morning quarterback," they are very wrong because they did not have all the available facts the president and secretary of defense have.
It is very wrong to try to fight the war in response to polls taken after every military action that dictate how the military should fight the war – especially when many of the polls are taken by supporters of the enemy, whose anti-American purpose is to damage the U.S. troops fighting the war.
There is nothing the United States could do to win the propaganda war in the Arab countries.The reason is very simple: "Birds of a feather flock together no matter what." No more discussion of this point is needed.
Arab demonstrations and Arab polls must be disregarded; otherwise, we are letting enemy propaganda and enemy opinion call the shots about how we fight the war. This never should be allowed.
We said some of the war protesters’ actions are unpatriotic, disloyal and border on treason. We do not say all, because many of the protesters are against war, as we are, but when war is declared by our president the protesters must stop protesting and support the president and troops until the war is over, when they may protest once again.
The troops are fighting for the protesters’ right to protest – but to protest at the right time, which is not during wartime.
The protesters are supporting Saddam Hussein, who forbids protests and even kills protesters. They are being led and manipulated by the Old Left Communist helpers from the Vietnam War.
They felt abandoned and powerless when Communism fell but remained in place waiting for the next chance to try gain power to reduce the United States to a second- or third-rate nation and install socialism throughout the world. Old dogs never change their habits.
The vast majority of American people support President Bush and the war effort, but the media wrongly build up the anti-war protesters and make them appear more important and powerful than they are. We need to tell the media to stop doing this.
The Socialist-Communist organizers of these protest demonstrations will never stop trying to bring down the U.S. government, so we do not appeal to them. Instead, we call upon all legitimate anti-war protesters to stop their protests until the war is over so they will not be harming the troops and the war effort. When the war is over, they can once again protest.
Wilson C. Lucom is vice-chairman of Accuracy In Media and served in the State Department during the administration of Franklin Roosevelt.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/1/24950.shtml

65gtoman Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
*****Also, I would like to hear what some of you liberal**


65gtoman Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Reading, this is what I see


some anti-war protesters are unpatriotic and disloyal, and their actions border on treason.

protesters creating negative, uninformed public opinion against the president, thereby harming the war effort of the troops.
Arab demonstrations and Arab polls must be disregarded; otherwise, we are letting enemy propaganda and enemy opinion call the shots about how we fight the war
The troops are fighting for the protesters’ right to protest – but to protest at the right time, which is not during wartime.
The protesters are supporting Saddam Hussein, who forbids protests and even kills protesters. They are being led and manipulated by the Old Left Communist helpers from the Vietnam War.
The vast majority of American people support President Bush and the war effort, but the media wrongly build up the anti-war protesters and make them appear more important and powerful than they are.
The Socialist-Communist organizers of these protest demonstrations will never stop trying to bring down the U.S. government


That’s a few things that pops right out as I read this. Not that I take this for fact, I just would like to hear some liberal views on this

Thank you.

jdrabinski Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 08-16-2002
Posts: 794
that is the single most absurd article i've read in months. we are still a democracy. what this pinhead is advocating is a totalitarian state...talk about the enemy within! fact remains, sorry to say for those who buy this guy's line, that we are a free society, in or out of war.

i am thinking of the ancient greeks, who said (wisely, i think) that in times of war, a country needs more debate, not less. the stakes are just that high. we need constant scrutiny. lives are lost and land it taken. we must scritinize and debate all the more when war is underway.

i especially love the reference to socialists and communists. as if all protesters were that! plus, socialism and communism are economic theories/practices. not at all anti-thetical to democracy. (in fact, many have argued that socialism is the truest democracy, and that capitalism leadds to oligarchy...think here of how the wealthy get their way in politics! pretty good point, i think). after all, it nowhere says in our constitutional documents that we must be a capitalist state.

this is extremist rhetoric, designed not to make a thoughtful point, but only to rally the fascistic right behind a message. few americans will really buy this, especially if they think about it for a minute or two.

John
65gtoman Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
So could you explain to more about what you said right here john: socialism and communism are economic theories/practices

And right here: in fact, many have argued that socialism is the truest democracy, and that capitalism leadds to oligarchy

And what you said right here: it nowhere says in our constitutional documents that we must be a capitalist state.

What would be your idea of a prefect America? Sounds like you have some? I want to just here some new ideas, please explain in more detail.

Thank you
65gtoman Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
I think we are getting somewhere here. It’s not so much, some of you don’t agree with the war. Some only want a socialist or communist government, so until that day happens you will always protest.

Also I think, I have a good view on liberals now.

There are 3big parts that make the liberal party

One is the old communist party (which leads the rest)

Two is the younger bigger socialists/Marxist Party (which most have been somewhat brainwashed)

Three would be the others that are not successful in there lives and blame the government for lack of income and or family life.

Im sure there’s a few (peace) people in there too, but do not have the mental resources to see their on the enemy’s side.


Basically it’s an unorganized party of anti-Americans that band together, if one would look at the liberal party as a whole.
Homebrew Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2003
Posts: 11,885
Sorry to point this out GTOman,
But you are sounding more and more facist. Anyone who doesn't agree with you, is "UnAmerican??" Liberals are all communist-socialist. Look up facist, everything fits, except the totalitarian government, which you seem to long for, by basically gegenerating, anyone who doesn't agree with you. I kept hoping this thread would die, so I didn't post this, but you need to at least understand the terminology, before you use it. Especially if you are going to use the term to define others. I will not post to this thread again, because you keep spewing the same nonsense, and hatred. Until this thread, I actually liked you, but now I see that you are just another hatemonger.
Later
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12