America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 22 years ago by temba. 22 replies replies.
Please post your least favorite Cigars
cruiser Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2001
Posts: 739
I received cigars for over $ 300.- and let me tell a lot of crappy cigar like Dark Shark i call it dark crapp. and coticas rothchild,miami havana rothchild, man all this big names (Rotchild) and terrible cigars, i just got burned with crapp.If everone post his least favorite smoke it would help and prevent other people on this board to buy crapp.eom
mmay Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 06-10-2001
Posts: 121
Sorry to hear about the Dark Shark - I just "won" a few. I tried the Ancla & Cazador torpedo and it was painful. The Flor del Todo is rough, too. At least they were cheap and may get better with age.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
any cigar that starts with "don" and any cigar made in mexico.
shooter Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 05-11-2000
Posts: 150
I agree with Rick.
Charlie Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2002
Posts: 39,751
I like the Don Lino Colorado cigars, but all other "Don" cigars are bad, and I think any TAMBORIL product is a cigar to avoid. Charlie
Charlie Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2002
Posts: 39,751
Oh, and any cigar made in the Phillipines.
BJLM1970 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 11-04-2000
Posts: 86
I posted A similar question a few months back, check the archives these guys put a great list togther of smokes to stay away from, but I will have to also go with RICK on the Mexican cigars BLAAA!!
Slimboli Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 07-09-2000
Posts: 16,139
Avoid any cigar from Puerto Rico ... BTW cruiser, Rothschild is a size, not a 'big brand name' ... LOL!
Mr.Mean Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 05-16-2001
Posts: 3,025
Fuego Del Rey, just worthless. Give away to strangers is what I did with them.
aberdeen Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-11-1999
Posts: 741
actually I use to really enjoy the Don Juan Churchill, a very nice toasty flavor. But they don't taste as nice as they use to, pretty bland now, so I won't buy anymore after this box.
cruiser Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2001
Posts: 739
i tought rotchild was a size, however i received 2 different size rotchilds. thanks eom
gdurfor Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2001
Posts: 288
I agree on the Don's also a brand with a good name but i personnally dislike are Puros Indios. Disliked'em about 6 months ago. Just got one for my birthday still Puros S***. Glenn
rookie139 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 03-02-2000
Posts: 2,149
I agree with GD on the Puros Indios...I wouldn't say they're the worst I've had, but IMHO they're bland and a waste of smoking time
Hansen Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 03-11-2000
Posts: 444
Rothschild is a size, usually 4.5 x 50, but as Robusto that varies from 4.5 over 5 (most common) to 5.5 x 50, Rothschilds can also be 5 x 50. Sizes can be very confusing. ON PUROS INDIOS, I can respect that PI won't apply to everyones palette, but to call it "bland"!!??? I love PI Rothschild and Especiales #4, they certainly has (good) taste, so bland???
joedayan Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 04-19-2001
Posts: 261
acid anything
tailgater Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
There are moments, during the enjoyment of a Puros Indios Toro Especial, that I wonder why they make any other cigars in the world. They are complex, well made, and heavenly. To dislike them is personal preference. To call them "bland" is simply wrong. To answer the question at hand, I gotta go with Chucky on the West Coast: Tamboril = crap.
Charlie Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2002
Posts: 39,751
Cruiser, I am not trying to be a wiseass, but you can buy a book on cigars and it will explain different sizes, ring and length and how they are constructed. There are variations on Rothchilds per different manufacturers, and all other names of cigars. The Cigar Book by Bati and Chase is pretty good and it will help you to understand the size and structure. Charlie :):):)
rookie139 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 03-02-2000
Posts: 2,149
Sorry....They're BLAND to me...Not complex in any way...plain tasting...I'd rather smoke a Don anything than a P.I....Just my $0.02
Hansen Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 03-11-2000
Posts: 444
Yeah, that would probably be a Don Turdo, wouldn't it? LOLOLOLOL!!!! - Couldn't resist, Keith. Couldn't resist.
tailgater Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Yeah, Puros Indios are bland. And a Lamborghini is sluggish; the Rolling Stones are a one-dimensional band; San Francisco is only slightly hilly; a habanero pepper has a bit of spice; Jesse Jackson is a fair and just man who simply wants people to earn their lot in life.
Mr.Mean Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 05-16-2001
Posts: 3,025
I'll agree with Tailgater. the one you sent me was quite nice. Good draw, plenty of smoke, and went well with my Abita Turbo Dog beer. Thanks! Shipping today BTW.
jagger Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 07-22-2001
Posts: 2
Ha Ha, puros Indios bland and one dimensional? Wow, they are made by Rolando Reyes, one of the premier cigar makers in the world, maker of Cuba Aliados and Roly. They also may be one of the top ten most flavorful cigars- made in Honduras with a rich Indonesian wrapper. Please be sure that you actually smoked a PI because Ive never heard of them as bland. A real PI is spicy, creamy smooth and rolled tighter than a frogs ass. Try one again, I bet you'll change your mind.
L8r
temba Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 04-08-2001
Posts: 6
My problem with a box of PI no. 4's has been very tight draw,or completely plugged. I've tried drying them out, doesn't help much. Anyone else had this problem with them? These came with yellow cello, so they've been around awhile.
Users browsing this topic
Guest