America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by Charlie. 15 replies replies.
Peter Jennings
65gtoman Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Former ABC Reporter Questions 'Competence' of Jennings
By Robert B. Bluey
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
December 08, 2003

(CNSNews.com) - A former colleague of Peter Jennings said the ABC News anchor can't comprehend his biased reporting because he believes his work is protecting the "peasantry in America."

Former ABC News correspondent Peter Collins, who worked with Jennings in the 1980s, said Monday night's news special on America's "obesity epidemic" is the latest example of Jennings' belief that he's looking out for the public good.

"It's not a one-side attack because in their minds, they have convinced themselves that this is the source of the problem," Collins said, "and in order to save the peasantry in America from obesity, it's their obligation to present these facts the way they present them."

Collins covered Central America for ABC's "World News Tonight" and "Nightline" from 1982 until 1991. He recently retired from journalism, and in May told CNSNews.com how Jennings altered scripts to praise the Marxist-backed Sandinista government in Nicaragua.

The obesity program, "How to Get Fat Without Really Trying," airs Monday at 8 p.m. EST. According to an ABC News press release, it will reveal why "much of the problem with the American diet is the direct result of federal government policy and food industry practices."

Without even having seen the program, Collins said it appeared to fit into a pattern of Jennings' past reports. Instead of calling the show an example of bias, however, Collins rather questioned the competency of Jennings and his associates.

"When he and his producer load and tilt a story, you can argue it's leftist bias, but it's just as effective to say they left out basic facts because they couldn't see them or they are incompetent to see them," Collins said.

A spokeswoman for ABC News did not return three calls requesting comment. Earlier this year, ABC News refused to discuss with CNSNews.com Collins' past criticism.

Collins recalled one encounter with Jennings in the late 1980s that he said illustrated the anchorman's thinking. Collins said he had just finished meeting with Jennings in his New York City office when the incident took place.

"On the way out, I stopped by the desk of his secretary," Collins said. "I remarked how nice Mr. Jennings had been. And she looked at me with kind of beatific smile and said, 'Yes, it's his sense of noblesse oblige.' "

Noblesse oblige, a French term, means an obligation of those in power to be honorable.

Collins pointed to Jennings' background as the son of Charles Jennings, who retired as vice president of the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. When Peter was 9 years old, he hosted his own radio program on CBC. Jennings was born and raised in Canada.

"Peter, I believe, genuinely thinks of himself as a nobleman doing public good," Collins said. "I know that sounds preposterous, but that's the attitude."

The special on obesity is the latest Jennings report to be panned. The Media Research Center, the parent organization of CNSNews.com, has been a frequent critic of the "World News Tonight" anchor. Jennings also has another program, "Peter Jennings Reporting," which will air the obesity report.

In May, the Media Research Center criticized a special Jennings did on the pharmaceutical industry for being one-sided. Jennings attacked U.S. drug companies for making excessive profits.

Collins said presenting the full picture or a balanced story doesn't appear to concern Jennings.

"Jennings and the people around him really believe they are performing a public service when they launch attacks on the food industry in this case, or American foreign policy in other cases," Collins said. "They earnestly believe in their rightness."
jdrabinski Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 08-16-2002
Posts: 794
Clearly we must purge our media of all who do not cheerlead the president.

I don't know if I can live knowing the Peter Jennings is a jerk. It is SO important to me that he be a nice guy and pro-Bush. How to go on...
kccody Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2007
Posts: 610
Jdrabinski

Are you able to fully comprehend anything you read? Or do you simply equate everything to your anti-right wing rhetoric?

Being a liberal or even anti-Bush/right is perfectly fine, just try having something intelligent to say in your posts. Where in this post did it mention either pro or anti bush anything? It was simply an article calling the integrity of Peter Jennings into question. If you have a comment on Mr. Jennings that goes against this article than feel free to make it, but using this totally unrelated article as another feeble attempt to bash Bush is about the most ignorant and immature thing I have seen in quite some time.

xibbumbero Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2002
Posts: 12,535
Whether you agree with P.Jennings style or not,the facts remain that the US food industry panders to profit,not to the the health of America. Europeans look at the USA's food industy and at what Americans eat and shake their heads in disbelief. X
JonR Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 02-19-2002
Posts: 9,740
Yo kcody: Allow me to explain why jdrabinski has trouble comprehending this post. It was one of our great philosophers ( Pee Wee Herman ) who once said: " It is difficult to read and comprehend when one is masturbating, that's why I only masturbate at the theater ". jdrabinski go watch a movie. JonR
Steve*R Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 07-23-2001
Posts: 1,858
It seems like Peter Collins and Bernard Goldberg are making careers out of bashing Peter Jennings. Though, I'm no fan of Peter Jennings, the intra-industry bashing is rather humorous.

Personally, I like Peter Collins and have long taken issue with Jenning's coverage of the Middle East. Jennings was formerly married to a Palestinian woman and the relationship appears to me to have perpetually colored his reporting of news from that part of the world.

Peter Collins has some of his own biases, however, and though I share many of them, his reporting should be examined in light of them. Collins, before his network stints, worked for Voice of America and served in the Army in Germany, prior to the Vietnam War. While in Vietnam, he married a Vietnamese woman who had children. One of the children, a girl, I recall, graduated from West Point. I also remember Collins saying, in an interview, that he had a son with his Vietnamese wife who was or is currently in the U.S. Marines. I have alot of respect for Peter Collins, but his continued bashing of Jennings (it's been going on for quite awhile) is beginning to sound like sour grapes.
THL Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-22-2002
Posts: 3,044

Pandering to profit is capitalism. Healthy foods are produced in abundance. Abundance that supplies many of those who criticize it's source.
This is just conditioning the public to perceive those involved in agri-business as evil conspirators against the public good, thereby paving the way for future lawsuits. It worked with the tobacco industry so the same techniques are being applied.
SUVs, guns and alcohol are also being targeted.
The big benefactors are? Why, trial lawyers, of course. Class action suits that yield $6.50 per plaintiff and millions for the law firms.

THL Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-22-2002
Posts: 3,044
BTW, I think Peter a dupe and unwitting accomplice. He may actually believe this tripe.
Sylance Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2003
Posts: 592
/sarcasm on/
Hey, let’s not blame the American public for obesity. It can’t be their fault… it has to be the corporations that supply the food. It’s McDonalds fault for tempting Americans with their fast food, not the public’s fault for sitting on the coach all day watching reality TV, eating their super sized fries, BigMac and 64 ounces of soda.
/sarcasm off/

This is another example of how our culture has shifted away from self-responsibility. As we cry out for more and more government intervention, we’re also saying we are too stupid to handle it ourselves. Some people see this as a danger, and some others see this as a way to make money.
kccody Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2007
Posts: 610
Sylance

Although I happen to agree with you 100% I will say this. If anybody actually followed the U.S. RDA (recommended daily allowance) for calories and nutrients, as well as the USDA recommended food guide pyramid, all but the most extremely active people would have trouble not gaining weight.
tailgater Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
X,
Europeans laugh at everything we do in America.
So what?
They still want to be us.

And Professor,
I'm beginning to wonder if you have any sense at all. And that's a damn shame.
SteveS Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
============================================================
"If anybody actually followed the U.S. RDA (recommended daily allowance) for calories and nutrients, as well as the USDA recommended food guide pyramid, all but the most extremely active people would have trouble not gaining weight."
============================================================

"extremely active" indeed
jjohnson28 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2000
Posts: 7,914
Mmmmmmmmmm BigMac
eleltea Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 03-03-2002
Posts: 4,562
I do not believe the professor is a professor, not that it really matters. I have never seen a thoughtful, reasoned post from him. One would think a professor could make one from time to time, without the invectives, epithets and derision.

For the record, not that it really matters, I'm an astronaut.
65gtoman Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Jdra-bin-ladenski your silly lol
Charlie Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2002
Posts: 39,751
What eletea said!

C
Users browsing this topic
Guest