America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by usahog. 5 replies replies.
Pass this on to All You Know
usahog Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Some Military Members might not be informed the Shots are On HOLD.. no more Manditory Vaccines... Pass the Word to all the Military Members you know

Hog

Subject: Attorney Mark Zaid requests emails from troops not offered informed consent


Send name, rank, SSAN, unit, time, date, place, and circumstances to:

[email protected]

BACKGROUND:

http://wireservice.wired.com/wired/story.asp?section=Breaking&storyId=808851&tw=wn_wire_story

QUOTE:

Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the six plaintiffs...said if the Pentagon deems the shots "voluntary," they must allow service members and civilian contractors directed to get them to opt out with no repercussions.

"When the next person is ordered to line up for the shot, they have to, before they inject the shot, say, 'Listen, if you don't want to take this, you don't have to.' If that person says, 'No,' they say, 'OK, move on.' That's informed consent."

If that was not done, "then they are in violation of the judge's order and subject to contempt of court."

END QUOTE


CWFoster Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
Too late for me! I already had five of the series, I only need one more next month, and on in July, and an annual booster every year after that. But I WAS told that anyone refusing to take it would be processed for discharge, and written up for failure to obey a direst order.
navybee Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 12-14-2001
Posts: 1
I certainly would NOT provide the asked info over the net, if indeed this a legit site, contact the VA office or Family service center
usahog Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
DEFENSE DEPARTMENT SEEKS COURT APPROVAL
TO CONTINUE ILLEGAL VACCINATION PROGRAM

Requests Court To Limit Injunction To Six Plaintiffs

WASHINGTON, D.C. --

The Department of the Defense ("DoD") filed a Motion with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking to limit a December 22, 2003, ruling to only the six unidentified plaintiffs in the lawsuit. The Court had imposed a Preliminary Injunction after concluding the anthrax vaccine "is an investigational drug and a drug being used for an unapproved purpose." As a result, the ruling issued by the Honorable Emett Sullivan now requires DoD to obtain "informed consent or presidential waiver" or otherwise prohibits the continuation of the anthrax vaccination program.

"The DoD's Motion seeks to turn the Court's ruling into a farcical exercise. The vaccination cannot be illegal for one person but legal for another, unless informed consent is obtained," said Mark S. Zaid, Esq., the Managing Partner of the Washington, D.C. law firm of Krieger & Zaid, PLLC, and co-counsel in the litigation. Zaid added that while he understood the legal arguments asserted by the Justice Department to limit the scope of the decision, the effort violates the spirit of the decision, if not the letter of the law.

Since the issuance of the Court's decision, the DoD has provided conflicting public statements about whether it intends to comply with the ruling. Although some reports indicate the vaccination program has stopped, others imply the Court's Order is being violated. The Food & Drug Administration, whose regulations are at issue in the litigation, has remained silent in the wake of the decision.

In light of the DoD's latest Motion, the plaintiffs' counsels are considering seeking class action certification to ensure the injunction applies to all service members and contractors, as well as pursuing a Motion to hold Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and the DoD in contempt of court, added Zaid.

In examining the merits of the case, Judge Sullivan concluded that the "DoD's administration of the inoculation without consent of those vaccinated amounts to arbitrary action." He further opined that "the right to bodily integrity and the importance of complying with legal requirements, even in the face of requirements that may potentially be inconvenient or burdensome, are among the highest public policy concerns one could articulate."

Nearly 500 active-duty service-members have refused the vaccine, and close to 200 have been court-martialed. Additionally, approximately 500-1000 pilots and flight crew members have quit, resigned or transferred from the Air National Guard or Reserves rather than take the vaccine. The vaccine is voluntary in the Australian, British and Canadian militaries, as well as for U.S. Department of State employees even though they serve in the same geographical region as that of U.S. military service members.

##

Copies of the lawsuit are available
upon request or at http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/03-707.pdf


Naveybee.. you are correct.. do not reply to this thread with info on your medical/Vaccine info.. you can email me for more info.. or read it at
www.milvacs.org
www.anthraxvaccine.org

BTW all who is aware of my recent situations.. I cleared or Passed and on my way to Walter Reed or Wilford Hall.. whichever will have me first...then I'm going Dancing!!!!!

Hog
tonester666 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 05-07-2003
Posts: 1,324
Good deal. Hope everything works out for ya. Thanks for the smokes and dinner. I owe ya one.
usahog Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Tonester.. Bro you don't owe me nothin!!! thats what gettin together and having a good time is all about... besides you bombed the hell outa me with them Great Smokes!!!! it was Great to meet ya and also watch a great ballgame... Braggin Rights MO. & IL Big Ten Basketball down to the wire and IL pulled it off by 1
Great Time!!!! we'll do it again soon Bro... plus maybe get some huntin in also??? lotta season left and my son said he's been knockin down some rabbits.. Morgan/Mocoupin county area... right now though I got duck/gease fever LOL...

Hog
Users browsing this topic
Guest