Anybody is entitled to thier opinion. As so often happens the opinion of the offended party is overlooked. I never said that no one had the right to post BS, just don't deny me my right to be outraged by an attack on the President of the United States. I have no real problem with Rick and many others who have concerns about the administration, that Democracy, and the beauty of living in a Republic. What galls me is when some a**hole decides to overstep the bounds of constructive criticism, and gets to mindles caracter assasinations designed to do nothing more than inflame. My other post was to point out that we should NOT blindly follow, as did the German people in the thirties, but reasonably question, and ensure the checs and balances are in place. Please notice that in the intrest of fairness, I stated that EVEN CLINTON didn't deserve that kind of comparison, and I consider him guilty of high treason! Compare him to Ethel and Julius Ronenburg perhaps, but not a maniac who was directly responsible for exterminating six million Jews, and another six million Gypsys, Catholics, Communists, Teachers, Protestants, and homosexuals, basically anyone who wouldn't be "a good little German" and follow blindly. S no, I'm not saying anyone shouldn't be able to air thier opinion, but if someone libels another, they should be prepared to accept responsibility for said libel as provided for by law. That's hard to make a case for with a public figure like the President, but I reserve my right to express outrage!
