I agree with Patman. But there is also one other thing to consider. First, Isreal conceded 90% of the points of disagreement to the Palestinians in the desire to make a lasting peace. Second, the PALESTINIANS are the ones who never recanted on their original pledge to exterminate the Jews in Isreal. Third, after the first point the PALESTINIANS walked away from the peace talks. Fourth, on the occaison of a visit by the Prime Minister of Isreal to the Temple Mount
(wailing wall), the PALESTINIANS went ballistic, and began rioting, and ARAFAT declared an Intefadah (not sure I spelled that right) and PALESTINIANS began blowing up innocent Jews (and alot of PALESTINIANS!). Speaking as a military man myself, I somehow doubt that the shooting of the baby was a deliberate, intentional act. The PALESTINIAN terrorists hide among the general population of their OWN PEOPLE and dare the Isrealis to fight back, then scream foul when they do. I REMEMBER the PALESTINIANS dancing in the streets and cheering on 9/11. I think the death of a child in the midst of a war is indeed tragic, but let's not place all the blame on the "Terrorist State of ISRAEL!"
A better analogy would be, how would you feel if your neighbor attacked the Russians, and they Nuked your street? The homes the Israelis bulldoze are the ones provided to the families of suicide bombers by the Saudis, the Iranians, and until recently, by Saddam Hussein. Should they allow them to stand as an example that by killing innocent people you can guarantee your family free housing for life? Let's look at BOTH sides, and not just an anti-semitic propaganda site shall we? Maybe the best answer is to turn the entire region to glass, and see if the cockroaches and ants can get along any better.