America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by CWFoster. 15 replies replies.
why liberals R racist and even worse then neoNazi
65gtoman Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
http://capmag.com/article.asp?ID=983

Racial Double Standards
by Walter Williams (July 30, 2001)

Summary: I don't believe white liberals are racists in the sense that Klansmen and neo-Nazis are, but their paternalistic vision, preconception and attitudes are far more debilitating to black Americans than today's Klansmen and neo-Nazis.


Cavallo Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
GTO: now *that* is one statement i can agree with you on. *shameless ends sentence with a preposition*

hell may now freeze over. :D
eleltea Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 03-03-2002
Posts: 4,562
Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put. ---Winston Churchill
kccody Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2007
Posts: 610
I love this guys way of thinking! Did any of you read his amnesty/pardon on his web page?




http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/gift.html
Cavallo Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
eleltea: one of my faves! ^5!

kcody: nice!
65gtoman Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Yes a free thinking mind, somewhat like the article I posted queer eye for the black guy.

The funny thing is, the liberal mind will read part of that story and the first thing that will come into their mind will be WHAT COLOR IS THE GUY WHO WROTE THIS I BET HE’S IN THE KKK!!!

lol you know that’s what they think, and as it turns out my little liberal minds, he happens to be black, now go call him a racist too lol
THL Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-22-2002
Posts: 3,044
Walter Williams along with Joe Sobran are 2 of my favorite columnists. Those 2 have more common sense than both parties combined. There's my prep. endng.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
no problem with the article except clarence thomas isn't qualified to sit on the supreme court. before he was appointed he never handled a major case, and since his appointment he has used the carbon copy of scalia's opinions on everything. he has no ideas of his own.

how about judge judy or judge mathes.

Cavallo Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
hey, if judge judy was in the SCOTUS, we might actually have a fully functional country! :)

"and in today's supreme court session, supreme court justice judy schienlin announced, 'DON'T PEE ON MY LEG AND TELL ME THAT IT'S RAINING! heLLLOOOO! IDIOTS!"
Charlie Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2002
Posts: 39,751
Rick

Of course you would object to Clarence Thomas and I imagine Judge Scalia as well! Way to go, at least you are consistent!

Charlie
eleltea Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 03-03-2002
Posts: 4,562
Rick, I couldn't find any major case that Ruth Ginsburg handled; I think she spent most of her life in academia. Without peeking, would you have objected to her appointment if she hadn't handled a major case? Isn't Clarence really unqualifed because he is not genuinely black on account of his political leanings? Granted, he is no Walter Williams, but you could at least give him a break as an affirmative action selection.
CWFoster Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
My favorite Churchill quote is the exchange he had with the Lady Astor! LOL
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
eleltea

he is my only objection to affirmative action.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
Charlie

i have a hard time with a man who bought a home in an area that doesn't sell to blacks or jews. his contract for the purchase of his home had that clause. he said he didn't know. maybe he should have had a lawyer explain it to him.

and what's with the gold sgt stripes?
kccody Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2007
Posts: 610
pretty damn funny!!!
CWFoster Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
What's the matter Rick? If it was kids trying to get into a college in Alabama, you and all the liberals would be going ape over their "civil disobedience in the intrest of civil rights". Now you favor racist deed restrictions? What's up with that?
Users browsing this topic
Guest