America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 19 years ago by Messier11. 13 replies replies.
NOT ABOUT GEORGE W BUSH
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248

WHAT IF KERRY HAD CHOSEN JESUS?
An Election Observation by TvNewsLIES.org

It took exactly one day for the media to focus more negative attention on John Edwards than they had focused on ****** Cheney in 4 years.

The media do not want John Kerry to win the election. War and terror bring ratings. Bush and Cheney bring war and terror. Do the math.

After an entire day of relentless attacks on John Kerry’s choice for vice president, I tried to think of a single human being whom our biased media would not slam. Try as I might, I could not imagine a single soul who would have been acceptable to the media, and once again was hit with clear evidence that the media do not want John Kerry to win the election. War and terror bring ratings. Bush and Cheney bring war and terror. Do the math.

Imagine for a moment that Jesus Christ actually had been on John Kerry’s short list of potential veeps. Imagine as well that He had been chosen for the job and had accepted the offer to be Kerry’s running mate. How much time would the media need to target Jesus with their venom? Think about what they might say…..

For one thing, they would surely criticize Jesus for not being self-made, considering the power and influence of his Father. Of course the liberal tag would be applied without hesitation. You just know they’d jump on His caring about the poor, condemning the money lenders, forgiving the trespassers, and all that bleeding heart, left wing slop. And don’t you just know that the Prince of Peace just couldn’t pass the patriotism test? The media would surely accuse Him of being a traitor for loving His enemies. He’d be accused of giving aid and comfort to terrorists around the world, and condemned for not supporting the troops!

The media would have a field day declaring Jesus a poor leader as well. Just look at the mess so many priests have made of His churches? How in heaven’s name (pun intended) could Jesus be trusted to run a nation when his own staff is so out of control? That one would be a hard one to shake off, for the media would constantly warn the public of the danger of placing homeland security, and their personal safety in His hands.

Of course, there’s that business about gays. Just think about the heyday the media would have about Jesus’ stance on people loving one another. Hmmm, they would immediately set Jesus up as a proponent of gay marriage, since He never clarified who should love whom. I suppose they’d have to wait to hear from Him directly about a woman’s right to choose. They’d make that their first question in any interview, for sure.

Quietly, the corporate media and the GOP would be terrified by the thought of Jesus as VP. The oil industry would suffer because Jesus has the connections to increase the supply of oil and ultimately reduce the costs and their profits. He might even perform another miracle and create a new energy source! The HMOs and large pharmaceuticals would never support Jesus, because He would be able to heal everyone for free. And the corporate polluters would really have something to be worried about. They would have to face His wrathful reaction to the damage they are doing to His planet.

The purpose of this parody is to emphasize the fact that the media is ripping John Edwards apart after giving ****** Cheney a free pass for three and a half years. Cheney, arguably the most corrupt and vile individual to ever hold office in this county has enjoyed complete immunity from criticism and investigation by the media. It took exactly one day for the media to focus more negative attention on John Edwards than they had focused on ****** Cheney in 4 years. The entire first day of his nomination was spent on defaming trial lawyers as some sort of criminal element in our society, and of repeating the suggestion that Edwards comes to the job with a weak resume for leading the nation. They never, ever, anywhere in the corporate media acknowledge that George Bush was head of a state in which the role of governor is limited and relatively weak when compared to that of the lieutenant governor. Anyone who understands politics knows that being the governor of Texas did not prepare George Bush for anything other than improving his golf game. But why tell that to the public, when you can knock Edwards in the process?

Is this blatant bias? You bet. Will it most probably continue? You bet. The larger problem is that the voting public, on the first day of his candidacy, has had doubts about John Edwards implanted in their minds. Those doubts were repeated in juxtaposition to repeated references to the great gravitas and experience of ****** Cheney. There was no contrast made about the relative honesty, openness, and decency of the two candidates for the post of vice president. And it will be that way for the duration.

As I said, I’m sure that Jesus would have fared just as badly at the hands of the media. But Jesus is not in the running, while John Edwards is. The agenda of the media is sadly obvious: it’s about ratings and money, nothing more. War and terror = ratings and money. Bush-Cheney = war and terror. Round and round, over and over.

Just watch. You’ll see the consistency. You’ll hear the mantras. The power of the media is not exaggerated. It’s just very, very frightening

00camper Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 07-11-2003
Posts: 2,326
The power of the media today is no more or no different than 100 years ago. There are just more channels.

If I'm not mistaken it was William Randolph Hurst who, upon hearing from a photographer that there was no war, said something like "you supply the pictures and I'll supply the war."
Charlie Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2002
Posts: 39,751
Hurst did not have the TV News channels and the Major Networks, if he did, wowwwwwwwwwwww!

Charlie
ducati996 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 01-02-2000
Posts: 3,475
Rosebud.....
eleltea Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 03-03-2002
Posts: 4,562
So which is it? Liberal press or conservative press?

The way Edwards made his millions I find reprehensible, but our government is overwhelmingly populated by attorneys. When they get finished killing off the doctors and the corporations, maybe they will eat each other.
00camper Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 07-11-2003
Posts: 2,326
It's also interesting to listen to the left complain about the media.

When Christians complain about the wasteland of television and movies they are told "don't blame us, its what sells," or "we're just giving people what they want."

That explanation for why left-wing radio can't make it on commercial stations without a subsidy isn't good enough for the left - they say it must be a right-wing conspiracy to keep liberal views off the air.

I'll say it again - media people don't care what the program is so long as advertisers want to pay money to hawk thir wares while the program is on. The only way to get advertiseres to buy time on commercial TV or radio is to play something that alot of people want to see or hear. Preferably over and over again.

RICKAMAVEN Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
00camper

i'm not a christian and i think television is a waste of time, except for a a few hours a week.
00camper Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 07-11-2003
Posts: 2,326
As far as the original post goes, the article's writer doesn't pay much attention to the news. Every time I hear a story about ****** Cheney, the reporter always takes extra time to remind listeners that Cheney ran Halliburton and that Halliburton is the prime military contractor in Iraq with a "no-bid" contract for the work. Yawn.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
00camper

if you stop yawning and think about it, cheney is still receiving deferred compensation from haliburton, a clear violation of the law.

doesn't it bother you at all that what he is doing is illegal?

yawn all you want, but clinton's bj, while tacky and stupid, was not illegal, and your treasury, was not being stolen by a corrupt vice president..

i would be interested in your take on this.
00camper Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 07-11-2003
Posts: 2,326



The yawn was for the article and the author's whining that Cheney gets a pass from the media while Edwards takes a pounding. My response is simply that I don't think the press is giving Cheney a pass at all since every story I hear about Iraq, Cheney, or Halliburton links the Vice President with Halliburton and the company's contracts with the military and always adds the phrase "no-bid" in the reference.

If the Vice President has or is doing something illegal then let a federal prosecutor empanel a grand jury to indict him and let a jury of his peers hear the case and decide his guilt or lack thereof.

Last I checked a person is not guilty of a crime unless they confess or are judged guilty by a jury of their peers.

RICKAMAVEN Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
00camper

you are correct, the press have recently pounding away at cheney.

do you really think ashcroft would order an investigation of cheney? i would suggest not.

there is the matter of propiety, that does not require a conviction, only the appearance.
00camper Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-11-2003
Posts: 2,326
RICKAMAVEN,
Now we get to the central issue - the APPEARANCE of wrongdoing, or impropriety. I'll continue your reference regarding Bill Clinton and his White House sexual escapades. The the activity wasn't illegal since both parties were over 18 years old at the time.

The activity was, however, improper and wrong because of Clinton's position of power vis-a-vis an office intern.

You cannot say with one breath that Clinton / Lewinski was merely a private matter and condemn Cheney / Halliburton with the next. Impropriety is impropriety whether between consenting adults or between governments and corporations and their agents.

RICKAMAVEN Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
SteveS

you certainly are right about impropiety and appearance of impropiety.

clinton got a bj. two consenting adults.

if you don't believe it, fact find for yourself and forget the talking heads and the clearly partisan web sites. read foriegn newspaper that do not have the same agenda that both the democrats or rebublicans have, which is to return to office and live off the public trough, like the pigs they are. read as much as you can and try to keep an open mind.

if you disagree and discount any and every thing negative about cheney, regardless of the source you select, you should wonder why.

cheney appears to be raping the treasurey.
who consented?
Messier11 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2002
Posts: 293
Two points..
1. You can find just about any opinion you want to subscribe to in the "media" . This is too broad a term.
2. Jesus would probably be a good choice for VP because he has experience playing second fiddle.
Users browsing this topic
Guest