lol -- hog, you are the FIRST and ONLY person i've known to have made that accusation against snopes. got a lot of uber-rightwing pals who would patently disagree with you there. i'd challenge you to prove that point. everything i've seen has been very, very even-handed, well supported and backed by unbiased facts.
they DEFEND bush even in ways not necessary. to wit: the "bush punch" rugby shot. not only do they explain it in detail, but they defend him by saying that in such shots it's very possible that the camera catches an innocent shot that just looks bad in that one, single frame.