DrMaddVibe wrote:If you were what you claim...you would have no use for the Kenyan King and the abuse he's perpetuated on the US citizenry.
Bailouts?
Abuses of the Attorney General?
Obamacare?
You'd better check yourself.
Opening ANOTHER front of military action.
Like I said...You're not fooling anyone.
lmao. So because I may not agree with everything Obama does I should have no use for him or defend him when I think he's right? Ridiculous.
I never supported the Libya thing, won't find it. I don't support the health care law as it does not go far enough and is a huge payoff to the insurance companies. Single payer is the way to go. You will find that position here if you search my posts.
Bailouts, tough one. Depends on what you are talking about. It is difficult to support the privatization of profits and the socialization of losses. Bush bailed out Wall Street, Obama GM. We're told it saved the economy, who the f knows. GM is making a profit now and it saved a lot of manufacturing jobs, something this country need desperately.
But none of those things you mentioned impact personal liberty. I know the right argues that forcing a person to get insurance does, but you are forced to get car insurance if you drive, and I'm not sure how a state forcing you to buy something is less of your personal liberty than if the federal government does it. But it's also why I support single payer.
I don't support the administration's position on drug laws, the extension of the patriot act and other things that I criticized the Bush administration for. That hasn't changed at all. Overall, I do think Obama is better than anything or anyone the republicans have put forward.