America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by pdxstogieman. 43 replies replies.
Another Great Idea from the Democratic Nannies
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
gjhuff Offline
#1 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2011, 5:02 PM EST
Joined: 05-30-2002
Posts: 56
http://lautenberg.senate.gov/assets/FRLLetterToFDAFlavoredCigars.pdf
DrafterX Offline
#2 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2011, 5:14 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Mellow
dpnewell Offline
#3 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2011, 5:43 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
Typical New Jersey Democrat. It's the votes of folks who think like Fuzz that put these jack butts in power.
FuzzNJ Offline
#4 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2011, 7:47 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
dpnewell wrote:
Typical New Jersey Democrat. It's the votes of folks who think like Fuzz that put these jack butts in power.



It's obvious that you don't know how I think and it's adorable that you think it's Democrats who are the only ones who do crap like this.
FuzzNJ Offline
#5 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2011, 7:48 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
And the fewer 'flavored' cigars the better imho. ;)
jackconrad Offline
#6 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2011, 9:28 PM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Frank Lautenberg is A child of Lucifer
yardobeef Offline
#7 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 1:20 AM EST
Joined: 10-25-2011
Posts: 849
Everyone please stop knocking this groundbreaking move. I already feel healthier and safer!
dpnewell Offline
#8 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 6:56 AM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
FuzzNJ wrote:
And the fewer 'flavored' cigars the better imho. ;)


OK, so here's finally something we can agree on.
dpnewell Offline
#9 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 6:57 AM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
jackconrad wrote:
Frank Lautenberg is A child of Lucifer


+1
dpnewell Offline
#10 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 6:59 AM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
FuzzNJ wrote:
It's obvious that you don't know how I think and it's adorable that you think it's Democrats who are the only ones who do crap like this.


You claiming you didn't vote for Lautenberg? Kind of find that hard to believe.
FuzzNJ Offline
#11 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 8:51 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
dpnewell wrote:
You claiming you didn't vote for Lautenberg? Kind of find that hard to believe.


I did vote for him, but just like most elections it's the choice of the lesser of two evils. I wish someone else would have stepped up when the corrupt guy went down.

I'll ask you then. If there is an election where there is a R and a D and the R supports say an anti-smoking bill or indefinate detention, and the D does not. Would you then vote for the Democratic candidate?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#12 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 9:17 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
I'll ask you then. If there is an election where there is a R and a D and the R supports say an anti-smoking bill or indefinate detention, and the D does not. Would you then vote for the Democratic candidate?



There's a more likely chance of Hell freezing over first than what you propose.
FuzzNJ Offline
#13 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 9:28 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
There's a more likely chance of Hell freezing over first than what you propose.


lol ThumbDown

Smoking bills introduced by Republicans, well a few. I had to stop searching because, well, I don't want to anymore. There were a lot more hits too.

http://blog.al.com/wire/2011/03/alabama_bill_to_ban_smoking_in.html
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/10/09/republicans-introduce-legislation-that-would-imprison-americans/
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/local&id=6182465 <---this one is PA where dp is

Pennsylvania - Legislation which calls for a total smoking ban statewide including all restaurants, bars and clubs has passed in a state Senate committee. A strong coalition against the ban includes the National Federation of Independent Business, bowling proprietors plus bar and tavern owners.

http://urbangrounds.com/2011/05/statewide-smoking-ban/ Texas

And this one shows what each state is doing, doesn't matter R or D.

http://www.smokinglobby.com/tobacco-news

And as far as indefinate detention goes, all but 6 R's and 6 D's voted against it. Oh, and my favorite Senator Bernie Sanders did also. So this shows that Democrats are the ones pushing this?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#14 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 10:15 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
lol ThumbDown

Smoking bills introduced by Republicans, well a few. I had to stop searching because, well, I don't want to anymore. There were a lot more hits too.

http://blog.al.com/wire/2011/03/alabama_bill_to_ban_smoking_in.html
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/10/09/republicans-introduce-legislation-that-would-imprison-americans/
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/local&id=6182465 <---this one is PA where dp is

Pennsylvania - Legislation which calls for a total smoking ban statewide including all restaurants, bars and clubs has passed in a state Senate committee. A strong coalition against the ban includes the National Federation of Independent Business, bowling proprietors plus bar and tavern owners.

http://urbangrounds.com/2011/05/statewide-smoking-ban/ Texas

And this one shows what each state is doing, doesn't matter R or D.

http://www.smokinglobby.com/tobacco-news

And as far as indefinate detention goes, all but 6 R's and 6 D's voted against it. Oh, and my favorite Senator Bernie Sanders did also. So this shows that Democrats are the ones pushing this?



Ahem...the premise was that I would vote for a D over a R not who introduced legislation.

Nice try to deflect though.
FuzzNJ Offline
#15 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 10:21 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Ahem...the premise was that I would vote for a D over a R not who introduced legislation.

Nice try to deflect though.


Typical Republican. It's the votes of folks who think like DMV that put these jack butts in power.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#16 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 10:45 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
Typical Republican. It's the votes of folks who think like DMV that put these jack butts in power.



Anyone that's really paying attention to what I put up and the way I think knows what an idiotic statement you thought up and posted.

Fasten your helmet Corky McSnickerdoodles...you're doing more damage!
FuzzNJ Offline
#17 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 10:57 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Anyone that's really paying attention to what I put up and the way I think knows what an idiotic statement you thought up and posted.

Fasten your helmet Corky McSnickerdoodles...you're doing more damage!


Thanks for the conversation. You helped me prove DP is full of sh*t. Have a great day.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#18 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 10:59 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
Thanks for the conversation. You helped me prove DP is full of sh*t. Have a great day.



You're welcome, but EVERY conversation you stick your .02 in is ALWAYS full of crap. Always has...always will. Occupy the couch.
HockeyDad Offline
#19 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 10:59 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
Subterfuge Outrage!
FuzzNJ Offline
#20 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 11:27 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
You're welcome, but EVERY conversation you stick your .02 in is ALWAYS full of crap. Always has...always will. Occupy the couch.


"Surgeon general, I believe I know why this is happening. I have found a direct correlation between the anger, and T.M.I. [goes to a whiteboard and beings writing out the equation: Anger=(L×W)/(M^2-∠)+YAW ] Anger equals length times width over mass squared minus angle of the shaft plus yaw. [finishes and looks at the surgeon general] Look, we all get angry, but when someone is consistently angry or always finding new reasons to be angry, it means they have a very very very very small d*ck."
DrMaddVibe Offline
#21 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 11:30 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
"Surgeon general, I believe I know why this is happening. I have found a direct correlation between the anger, and T.M.I. [goes to a whiteboard and beings writing out the equation: Anger=(L×W)/(M^2-∠)+YAW ] Anger equals length times width over mass squared minus angle of the shaft plus yaw. [finishes and looks at the surgeon general] Look, we all get angry, but when someone is consistently angry or always finding new reasons to be angry, it means they have a very very very very small d*ck."



Well, your self-examination and thesis is well thought out and reasoned but only you know that for sure or not.
HockeyDad Offline
#22 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 11:33 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
At quick glance it appears that the formula is missing the "Couch Modifier".

I will apply for a Federal grant to research it further.
FuzzNJ Offline
#23 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 11:33 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Well, your self-examination and thesis is well thought out and reasoned but only you know that for sure or not.


Another 'I know you are, but what am I?' response? Sad.
HockeyDad Offline
#24 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 11:35 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
FuzzNJ wrote:
Another 'I know you are, but what am I?' response? Sad.




Actually there was no "what am I" component. You have overstated once again.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#25 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 11:36 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
HockeyDad wrote:
Actually there was no "what am I" component. You have overstated once again.



verr,very,very,very,very understated!!!Frying pan
yardobeef Offline
#26 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 11:41 AM EST
Joined: 10-25-2011
Posts: 849
This is why we can't have nice things.
borndead1 Offline
#27 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 11:53 AM EST
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Ahem...the premise was that I would vote for a D over a R not who introduced legislation.

Nice try to deflect though.



So...are you saying that you DO put party over principle?
yardobeef Offline
#28 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 12:05 PM EST
Joined: 10-25-2011
Posts: 849
Why must you bait him?
DrafterX Offline
#29 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 12:22 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
FuzzNJ wrote:
"Surgeon general, I believe I know why this is happening. I have found a direct correlation between the anger, and T.M.I. [goes to a whiteboard and beings writing out the equation: Anger=(L×W)/(M^2-∠)+YAW ] Anger equals length times width over mass squared minus angle of the shaft plus yaw. [finishes and looks at the surgeon general] Look, we all get angry, but when someone is consistently angry or always finding new reasons to be angry, it means they have a very very very very small d*ck."




I didn't realize TW was such an angry guy.... Mellow
tailgater Offline
#30 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 12:44 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
dpnewell wrote:
Typical New Jersey Democrat. It's the votes of folks who think like Fuzz that put these jack butts in power.



FuzzNJ wrote:
It's obvious that you don't know how I think...



dpnewell wrote:
You claiming you didn't vote for Lautenberg? Kind of find that hard to believe.




FuzzNJ wrote:
I did vote for him.




You can't make this stuff up.
yardobeef Offline
#31 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 1:01 PM EST
Joined: 10-25-2011
Posts: 849
In all seriousness, if this thing happens, it's pretty much farewell to a lot of brick and mortar stores. As much as the flavored cigars get bashed around here, they make up a large percentage of sales.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#32 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 1:06 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
borndead1 wrote:
So...are you saying that you DO put party over principle?



Not at all.

The alphabet soup is what got us in the mess we're in.

He was defending voting for known douchebags over the unknown ones.
dpnewell Offline
#33 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 1:51 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
FuzzNJ wrote:
I did vote for him, but just like most elections it's the choice of the lesser of two evils. I wish someone else would have stepped up when the corrupt guy went down.

I'll ask you then. If there is an election where there is a R and a D and the R supports say an anti-smoking bill or indefinate detention, and the D does not. Would you then vote for the Democratic candidate?


Just further proof that you only read into folks what you want to. You should know by now that I vote L, and have done so since '96, making your question irrelevant. It's folks like you who vote for a D, just to keep out an R, or those who vote R just to keep out the D, that has given us the fracked up representatives we now have.
dpnewell Offline
#34 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 2:02 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
FuzzNJ wrote:
Thanks for the conversation. You helped me prove DP is full of sh*t. Have a great day.


I vote principal over party or popularity. You have admitted in this thread that you’ll vote for the lesser of two evils. Instead of voting for the best person, you’ll vote for someone you may have reservations about, just to keep a so called “greater evil” out of office. Yet I’m the one full of sh*t. OK, cookie boy, whatever helps you feel better about yourself.
FuzzNJ Offline
#35 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 2:07 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
dpnewell wrote:
I vote principal over party or popularity. You have admitted in this thread that you’ll vote for the lesser of two evils. Instead of voting for the best person, you’ll vote for someone you may have reservations about, just to keep a so called “greater evil” out of office. Yet I’m the one full of sh*t. OK, cookie boy, whatever helps you feel better about yourself.


Yes, I do vote for the lesser of two evils. I have voted third party as a protest vote when the outcome is certain, but I usually don't like throwing my vote away. I'm not ashamed of it at all. I am pissed off when the person I did vote for does something with which I do not agree, but that's just the way things go. There are a lot of things I disagree with that are done by all politicians, but one must choose the one that agrees with your positions the most frequently and has the possibility of being elected.

'cookie boy'? how old are you really?
HockeyDad Offline
#36 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 2:44 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
FuzzNJ wrote:
one must choose the one that agrees with your positions the most frequently and has the possibility of being elected.




^That is how we guarantee the one party system! We thank you for your support.
yardobeef Offline
#37 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 3:29 PM EST
Joined: 10-25-2011
Posts: 849
This is why we need to add "None of the Above" as a choice on every ballot for every office.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#38 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 3:32 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
yardobeef wrote:
This is why we need to add "None of the Above" as a choice on every ballot for every office.



Think


What if "they" won?

How is that representation?
yardobeef Offline
#39 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 3:41 PM EST
Joined: 10-25-2011
Posts: 849
If "None of the Above" wins, a new election is called with all prior candidates ineligible to run again.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#40 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 3:43 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
yardobeef wrote:
If "None of the Above" wins, a new election is called with all prior candidates ineligible to run again.



Uh...that's costs MORE taxpayer money!

Beleive me, I'm seeing where you're wanting to go...just not a good path to get there. An American Bastille Day would solve some of the problems though!
HockeyDad Offline
#41 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 3:44 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
yardobeef wrote:
If "None of the Above" wins, a new election is called with all prior candidates ineligible to run again.



Instead I propose a panel of business leaders and special interest groups pick the winner.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#42 Posted: Fri, Dec 16 2011, 3:50 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
HockeyDad wrote:
Instead I propose a panel of business leaders and special interest groups pick the winner.



What about a "Running Man" type tv show and the winner gets a chance to run for office instead?
pdxstogieman Offline
#43 Posted: Sat, Dec 17 2011, 6:08 PM EST
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
Hockeydad's true identity revealed:

http://www.matthewlesko.com/free-money/index.html
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top