America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Child Administered 4 Vaccines Without Parental Consent

by SARAH, THE HEALTHY HOME ECONOMIST on FEBRUARY 29, 2012 in VACCINATION

It appears the time has come for parents who oppose vaccination to instruct their children to kick, scream, and fight if any authorities at school, a doctor’s office or anyone else ever attempts to vaccinate them.

An attempt by someone to vaccinate a minor without parental consent should be treated by the child the same way as physical assault by a stranger, with the threat to health being extremely grave in either situation.

In other words, the child should be taught to resist and refuse, even screaming for another adult to come to their assistance if necessary.

Detroit mother Sighle Kinney is probably wishing she had done something similar as her 14 year old daughter was recently administered no less than FOUR vaccines, including HPV, without her knowledge or consent.

The mother is “angry with everybody” over this turn of events particularly since she specifically signed a document indicating that medical treatment must never be administered to her daughter without her consent.

Ms. Kinney’s daughter developed a rash all over her body as a result of the poison forcibly injected into her body and had to miss several days of school as a result.

Paging Mr Fenster?!!!


Having had a signed document I would also assume so too.

If only we would have Vaccinated Obama..

Based on the article, the vaccinations) appear to have been an intentional, impermissible touching. That is a classic "battery" (not "assault"). The child, through her mother, would theoretically be entitled to damages. Her mother may be entitled to damages to- depending on the law of the jurisdiction.

If someone knowingly refused to honor the written prohibition, that is willful, wanton disregard for the (presumably) lawful wish(es) of the mother. This may entitle the kid, through her mother, and possibly the mother, to punitive damages.

If someone merely, innocently failed to note the written prohibition, that is negligence.

The allergic reaction goes to damages. So does mom's outrage.

Good enough?