America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by DrMaddVibe. 11 replies replies.
Sound And Look Familiar?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554

Chevron halts production after leak at Brazil oil field


Chevron have already been fined $100m for November's oil spill Continue reading the main story

Brazil police seek Chevron charge
Chevron faces $10.6bn Brazil suit
Brazilian police probe oil spill

The US oil company Chevron says it has temporarily halted production operations in Brazil after a fresh oil leak was discovered.

It has detected what it calls a "small new seepage" of oil on the seabed close to a well in the Frade field, where there was a major leak in 2011.

The company says it has taken the step as a precaution.

In November up to 3,000 barrels of oil spilled from the well, which is around 240 miles (370km) off Rio de Janeiro.

New fine

Brazil's oil regulator, ANP, says it is unclear how large the latest spillage might be, but that the oil seems to be coming from cracks in the ocean floor close to the well, rather than the well itself.

Chevron is already facing a $100m (£64m) fine for November's leak, and ANP says it will impose a new fine for failing to prevent this latest spill.

Chevron has confirmed the leak in a statement, and says it is working to collect any crude oil that has made its way into the ocean.

Company executives say there is no evidence the new leak was caused by drilling.

The Frade field is the largest foreign run oil field in Brazil, and produces around 60,000 barrels of crude oil a day.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-17393531?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter



Think

I wonder if Brazil revokes their charter?
z6joker9 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2011
Posts: 5,902
DrMaddVibe wrote:
In November up to 3,000 barrels of oil spilled from the well, which is around 240 miles (370km) off Rio de Janeiro.


Outrageously insignificant. Just like this one is likely to be. The resources wasted worrying about this will be more harmful than the actual spill.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
Just like the last spill in the Gulf...that's what they ADMIT to...watch it happen!
z6joker9 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2011
Posts: 5,902
And just like the spill in the gulf, the panic will cause more damage than the spill (not counting the loss of life from the incident that triggered everything).
DrMaddVibe Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
z6joker9 wrote:
And just like the spill in the gulf, the panic will cause more damage than the spill (not counting the loss of life from the incident that triggered everything).



Okay, you lost me. Are you saying that the spill in the Gulf was just a little mistake and that it's all been fixed?
DrafterX Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
what spill in the Gulf..?? Huh
z6joker9 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2011
Posts: 5,902
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Okay, you lost me. Are you saying that the spill in the Gulf was just a little mistake and that it's all been fixed?


I'm saying the chaos surrounding it was more harmful than the spill. Talk about adding insult to injury- that year the tourism to the gulf coast was dead, and the market for seafood from the area dried up. That's because people thought the seafood was tainted, and the beaches were covered by oil. Neither was true. In fact, that year the beaches were the cleanest I've ever seen them (including seaweed and such). I watched a gentleman catch at least 30 fish in 10 minutes in front of our condos. All the while, people kept talking about the accident like it was going to turn the gulf into a wasteland. People forget that oil is natural, and that the earth already has a way of dealing with these spills (large natural leaks are common). We underestimate mother nature's ability to heal itself. Sure enough, the spill caused far, far less damage than anticipated, but thanks to the panic, much of the gulf coast economy was wrecked for a while. Not to mention the unintended side effects of the dispersants that may or may not have actually helped anything.

There is a lot more but I don't have time to type it... gotta wrap up my work day!
daveincincy Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
I spilled a really big beer while boating in the gulf... d'oh! I'm sorry.


3000 barrels does sound insignificant...not that it's a good thing. How many equivalent barrels spilled in the Gulf? A LOT. To me, 3000 barrels is like saying we lost 1 billion dollars, but we still have 299 billion left.

What I see from this spill is just another reason to jack gas prices up another .10 - .20 cents/gallon. Think
z6joker9 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2011
Posts: 5,902
The deepwater horizon spill was estimated at 5 million barrels.

In the gulf of mexico alone, there are 600 known natural seeps that leak up to 1 million barrels a year. California has thousands of natural seeps.
z6joker9 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2011
Posts: 5,902
To put the gulf spill into perspective, that's 1 gallon of oil for every 3 billion gallons of water in the gulf.

Or one above average male pee spread across around 2500 olympic swimming pools. Over 4 months.

That's with 5 million barrels in the gulf. Imagine 3000 barrels in the Atlantic.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554


Brazil bars Chevron executives from leaving over spill


George Buck, chief operating officer for Chevron's Brazil division, is among a group of executives barred from leaving the country as it considers criminal charges stemming from an oil spill.
A federal court in Brazil has issued an order barring 17 executives from U.S. oil giant Chevron and Transocean Ltd. from leaving the country while it mulls criminal charges against them for an oil spill last year.

Among the 17 who were ordered Saturday by a federal judge in Rio de Janeiro to give up their passports is an American: George Buck, the chief operating officer of Chevron's Brazil division.

Kurt Glaubitz, a Chevron spokeman, said the company has not received a formal notification of the order.

"Any legal decision will be abided by the company and its employees," he said. "We will defend the company and its employees."

The oil spill occurred in deep water off the coast of Rio de Janeiro in November.

The next month, Brazilian federal prosecutors filed a suit against Chevron and oil rig operator Transocean for 20 billion reais, about $11 billion.

The civil suit also seeks to halt the operations in Brazil of the oil giant and its rig operator, according to federal prosecutors in the state of Rio de Janeiro.

"Chevron and Transocean were not able to control the damages caused by the spilling of almost 3,000 barrels of oil, which shows a lack of environmental planning and management by the companies," the prosecutors office said in a statement at the time.

The damages would be by far the largest sought so far by Brazilian officials for the November leak. However, experts on the Brazilian legal system are saying the suit is not likely to be won.

The spill was tiny when compared to the Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010 when some 4 million barrels of oil leaked into the Gulf of Mexico off the U.S. coast. However, it drew attention to environmental risks as Brazil develops its so-called "subsalt region" in extreme depths off the coast of Rio.

It also heightened tensions with Chevron and other foreign companies operating in the country's oil sector.

On Friday, the Brazilian navy and Chevron officials spotted a thin sheen of oil in the same area where the spill occurred. The sheen extended about 1 kilometers (0.6 mile), Chevron said.

As a result, Chevron suspended production at the Frade offshore field -- about 60,000 barrels a day -- and was using special containment devices to capture the seep.

The company was studying the new seep and trying to determine the geological features in the area that would have caused it, Glaubitz said.

"Once we determine that, we will re-start production," he said.

Brazil aims to be the world's fifth-largest oil producer by 2020.

"By some estimates, the oil you recently discovered off the shores of Brazil could amount to twice the reserves we have in the United States," U.S. President Barack Obama said during a trip to Brasilia in March 2011.

Saying that the United States wants to help Brazil with technology and support to develop such oil reserves, Obama added America "could not be happier with the potential for a new, stable source of energy."

"And when you're ready to start selling, we want to be one of your best customers," he said.

http://articles.cnn.com/2012-03-18/americas/world_americas_brazil-oil-spill_1_deepwater-horizon-oil-spill-kurt-glaubitz?_s=PM:AMERICAS
Users browsing this topic
Guest