America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by Stinkdyr. 20 replies replies.
Pelosi: Amend the First Amendment ( CALLING TED NUGENT !)
jackconrad Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461


By Terence P. Jeffrey
April 19, 2012



(CNSNews.com) - House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on Thursday endorsed a movement announced by other congressional Democrats on Wednesday to ratify an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would allow Congress to regulate political speech when it is engaged in by corporations as opposed to individuals.

The First Amendment says in part: "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press..."

Television and radio networks, newspapers, publishing houses, movie studios and think tanks, as well as political action committees, are usually organized as, or elements of, corporations.
dubleuhb Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
Poor Nancy and friends, can't take the heat. Maybe we should put the shoe on the other foot, her big mouth has said some pretty nasty things about some companies and organizations.
Guess that is OK as she considers herself important.
rfenst Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
Well, there was no such thing as corporations when the First Amendment was written and ratified...














(Sounds creible, buut I do not know whther it is true or not.)
rfenst Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
I haven't read anything about this all yet, but here is my take thus far:

Instead of speaking out for First Amendment change, I would think it better to just simply change election and campaign laws that limits each corporation to the donation limit applicable each individual. Sure, that is still a First Amendment issue either way, but it doesn't com off as a direct attack on the Bill Of Rights and the new law still has to pass First Amendment scrutiny.

HockeyDad Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
We've got plenty of amendments....we lose a few. Looks they've started with #1 and will be proceeding in numerical order.

Fricking Democrats.
dpnewell Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
rfenst wrote:
I haven't read anything about this all yet, but here is my take thus far:

Instead of speaking out for First Amendment change, I would think it better to just simply change election and campaign laws that limits each corporation to the donation limit applicable each individual. Sure, that is still a First Amendment issue either way, but it doesn't com off as a direct attack on the Bill Of Rights and the new law still has to pass First Amendment scrutiny.



Problem is, Unions would get a bye and continue to spend millions in member's dues to help elect Dems. Nancy and friends are trying to shut up conservatives. That's what all this is about.
teedubbya Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Ted Nugent and Pelosi are more similar than different. Both are fairly worthless at this point and neither has much intelligent to say.
Buckwheat Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
teedubbya wrote:
Ted Nugent and Pelosi are more similar than different. Both are fairly worthless at this point and neither has much intelligent to say.


At least Ted is a hell of guitar player. Not many people can rock a Byrdland as loud as he can without putting it into feedback hell.

http://www.gibson.com/en-us/Lifestyle/ProductSpotlight/GearAndInstruments/seven-incongruous-rigs-that/

Pelosi should smoke more pot. Then maybe she would start to have some rational ideas. Who knows what goes through her head. Sarcasm


teedubbya Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Seen him a couple times... I'll give you that. But the last time was a pretty bad show.... he's a has been....that said he should stick to music. He's no sean penn.
tailgater Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Love Ted or hate him, at least there was a point in time when he contributed something worthwhile.

The same can not be said for pelosi.
teedubbya Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
Love Ted or hate him, at least there was a point in time when he contributed something worthwhile.

The same can not be said for pelosi.


not true. it is a little known fact that she was the second drummer behind the screen that made the def leaopard drummer sound complete.

She also played lead guitar on children of the sun.
Buckwheat Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
That's some funny chit TW. And I always thought Pelosi was the voice behind Linda McCartney and Yoko Ono.
ZRX1200 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,656
TW only gives her credit for this because she was servicing him eith her free hand.
rfenst Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
dpnewell wrote:
Problem is, Unions would get a bye and continue to spend millions in member's dues to help elect Dems. Nancy and friends are trying to shut up conservatives. That's what all this is about.


Unions are corporations too.

But, that is not my point, which is that if this is being proposed, there is a better, smoother way to do it.
tailgater Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
not true. it is a little known fact that she was the second drummer behind the screen that made the def leaopard drummer sound complete.

She also played lead guitar on children of the sun.


To complement the def leopard drummer, did she only play with her left arm?
FuzzNJ Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Amendments are proposed and actually introduced a lot, especially by Republicans. Since 2000.

A balanced budget amendment, in which Congress and the President are forced to balance the budget every year, has been introduced many times.

School Prayer Amendment proposed on April 9, 2003, to establish that "The people retain the right to pray and to recognize their religious beliefs, heritage, and traditions on public property, including schools."[5]

God in the Pledge of Allegiance – declaring that it is not an establishment of religion for teachers to lead students in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance (with the words "one Nation under God"), proposed on February 27, 2003, by Oklahoma Representative Frank Lucas.[6]

Every Vote Counts Amendment – proposed by Congressman Gene Green on September 14, 2004. It would abolish the electoral college.[7] Partly a response to the controversy surrounding Al Gore's defeat in the 2000 election.

Continuity of Government Amendment – after a Senate hearing in 2004 regarding the need for an amendment to ensure continuity of government in the event that many members of Congress become incapacitated,[8] Senator John Cornyn introduced an amendment to allow Congress to temporarily replace members after at least a quarter of either chamber is incapacitated.[9]

Equal Opportunity to Govern Amendment – proposed by Senator Orrin Hatch. It would allow naturalized citizens with at least twenty years' citizenship to become president.

Seventeenth Amendment repeal – proposed in 2004 by Georgia Senator Zell Miller. It would reinstate the appointment of Senators by state legislatures as originally required by Article One, Section Three, Clauses One and Three.

The Federal Marriage Amendment has been introduced in the United States Congress four times: in 2003, 2004, 2005/2006 and 2008 by multiple members of Congress (with support from then-President George W. Bush). It would define marriage and prohibit same-sex marriage, even at the state level.

Twenty-second Amendment repeal – proposed as early as 1989, various congressmen, including Rep. Barney Frank, Rep. Steny Hoyer, Rep. José Serrano,[10] Rep. Howard Berman, and Sen. Harry Reid,[11] have introduced legislation, but each resolution died before making it out of its respective committee. The current amendment limits the president to two elected terms in office, and up to two years succeeding a President in office. Last action was in February 2009.

On January 16, 2009, Senator David Vitter of Louisiana proposed an amendment which would have denied US citizenship to anyone born in the US unless at least one parent were a US citizen, a permanent resident, or in the armed forces.[12]

On February 25, 2009, Senator Lisa Murkowski, because she believed the District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009 would be unconstitutional if adopted, proposed a Constitutional amendment that would provide a Representative to the District of Columbia.[13]

On November 11, 2009, Senator Jim DeMint proposed term limits for the U.S. Congress, where the limit for senators will be two terms for a total of 12 years and for representatives, three terms for a total of six years.[14]

On November 15, 2011, Representative James P. McGovern introduced the People's Rights Amendment, a proposal to limit the Constitution's protections to the rights of natural persons, and not corporations.[15]


From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_proposed_amendments_to_the_United_States_Constitution#21st_century

Strict constitutionalists? Hardly
Buckwheat Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
ThumbDown

Looks like a list of really bad ideas to me.
teedubbya Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
To complement the def leopard drummer, did she only play with her left arm?



Yes. The right was taking care of my needs.
DadZilla3 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
rfenst wrote:
Well, there was no such thing as corporations when the First Amendment was written and ratified.


I think the Massachusetts Bay Company was a corporation...that was back in the 1600's. Then again, it's been quite a while since I took a history class.Think
Stinkdyr Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
The illiberal lefty Republicrats and Demicans are not interested in your freedom.


They want you to shut up, work hard, pay more taxes..........so they get re-elected.


Beer
Users browsing this topic
Guest