America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by Stinkdyr. 15 replies replies.
“The I-word is racist,”
DrafterX Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
O’Reilly Blasts Coordinator of Campaign Aimed at Making the Phrase ‘Illegal Alien’ a Racial Slur; Says “Don’t Demonize People Who Are Accurate”

Friday on The O’Reilly Factor, Monica Novoa, a campaign coordinator for ‘Drop the I-Word,’ spoke out on the program’s new initiative to make the term ‘illegal alien’ morally on par with racial slurs., and her conversation with Bill O’Reilly quickly became heated.

O’Reilly argued that Novoa’s cause is misguided because it is, in fact, a federal crime to enter the U.S. illegally. “I’m not committing a hate crime by saying illegal aliens are just that.” he said.
When Novoa said that in the past laws have been changed in order to make for a more humane society, O’Reilly said, “Then work to change them. Don’t demonize people who are accurate in the description as using a slur or using a hate word because that’s not true.”

When Novoa was asked about whether she believes the U.S. should have open borders, she said, “I think that what we should be doing right now is looking at the reality and the reality is that people are here, and people are parts of families.” O’Reilly quickly interjected claiming that Novoa dodged the question and was filibustering, “two things we don’t allow on this program.”

When Novoa was stumped by O’Reilly’s line of questioning, O’Reilly charged, “You come in here with a very hot campaign, run by a far-left website demonizing people like me who are accurately telling the people what is happening and you don’t even know what you want.”

When Novoa fought back, saying, “The I-word is racist,” O’Reilly said, “I’m not a racist, I’m just reporting what’s happening. People are coming here, and they’re not just Latino, they are Asian, they’re Russian, they’re everyone, and they are coming here illegally, therefore they are illegal aliens. I’m not a racist, I’m not trying to hurt anybody, I’m trying to tell the people the truth.”


Film at 11.... Mellow





the video:
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/04/30/oreilly-blasts-coordinator-of-campaign-aimed-at-making-the-phrase-illegal-alien-a-racial-slur-says-dont-demonize-people-who-are-accurate/
bloody spaniard Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Why is the film always at 11?Think
DrafterX Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Think
daveincincy Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
Is it even on film anymore? Think
DrafterX Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Mellow
bloody spaniard Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Just wondering why they can't say 11:15 or 10:45. Think

Btw, saw that interview the other night. Very silly overall. She had her talking points & he was either stumped or didn't care to trick her into answering his questions. All in all, pretty sad & a waste of my time.

Besides I don't know what she's complaining about- we already have open borders. Just a matter of time before they're declared legal. Remember Reagan's amnesty? (shrugging shoulders)
DrafterX Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
bloody spaniard wrote:
Just wondering why they can't say 11:15 or 10:45. Think





The Film has always been at 11 and noone has ever complained... Shame on you Shame on you Shame on you
wheelrite Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Computing Dictionary


film at 11 definition
jargon
(MIT, in parody of US TV newscasters) 1. Used in conversation to announce ordinary events, with a sarcastic implication that these events are earth-shattering. " ITS crashes; film at 11." "Bug found in scheduler; film at 11."
2. Also widely used outside MIT to indicate that additional information will be available at some future time, *without* the implication of anything particularly ordinary about the referenced event. For example, "The mail file server died this morning; we found garbage all over the root directory. Film at 11." would indicate that a major failure had occurred but that the people working on it have no additional information about it as yet; use of the phrase in this way suggests gently that the problem is liable to be fixed more quickly if the people doing the fixing can spend time doing the fixing rather than responding to questions, the answers to which will appear on the normal "11:00 news", if people will just be patient.
jetblasted Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
TV News stopped using film 35 years ago . . .
wheelrite Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
jetblasted wrote:
TV News stopped using film 35 years ago . . .


they use crayons now..
8trackdisco Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,078
I'm offended by all words. "W S B I" Words Should Be Illegal.

Words make me sad.
bloody spaniard Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
8trackdisco wrote:
I'm offended by all words. "W S B I" Words Should Be Illegal.
Words make me sad.



Words don't hurt people. Lawyers do.
or
If words are made illegal, only lawyers would have them.
Gonz
rfenst Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,330
bloody spaniard wrote:
Words don't hurt people. Lawyers do.
or
If words are made illegal, only lawyers would have them.
Gonz



But, lawyers already have too many.
bloody spaniard Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
rfenst wrote:
But, lawyers already have too many.



At times, so does my wife.Sad
Stinkdyr Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
does this mean we can say honkey trash again?


Think
Users browsing this topic
Guest