America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by DrMaddVibe. 67 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
Who's more likely to ban cigars?
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
FuzzNJ Offline
#51 Posted: Tue, Jun 19 2012, 2:08 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
teedubbya wrote:
Because its more fun to watch you get all huffy


I'm sure that's the reason. It has nothing to do with the fact that the people claiming a right to smoke from God are dumb asses.
teedubbya Offline
#52 Posted: Tue, Jun 19 2012, 2:10 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
FuzzNJ wrote:
I'm sure that's the reason. It has nothing to do with the fact that the people claiming a right to smoke from God are dumb asses.

What is this? Oh, but of course. This little one wish to commit suicide to prove her love for me. What a sweet gesture. Nevertheless, I must prevent it.

FuzzNJ Offline
#53 Posted: Tue, Jun 19 2012, 2:41 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
teedubbya wrote:
What is this? Oh, but of course. This little one wish to commit suicide to prove her love for me. What a sweet gesture. Nevertheless, I must prevent it.



emo
tailgater Offline
#54 Posted: Tue, Jun 19 2012, 3:15 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
FuzzNJ wrote:
I'm sure that's the reason. It has nothing to do with the fact that the people claiming a right to smoke from God are dumb asses.


from God??

Man, your daddy beat you real good, didn't he?
tailgater Offline
#55 Posted: Tue, Jun 19 2012, 3:18 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
FuzzNJ wrote:
Why won't anyone answer the question?


I did.
I say that I have a right to smoke in areas deemed appropriate.
I'm being very specific. Keeping on topic.
Where do I lose you on this?

Is this one of the liberal re-directs?
Like "it depends on what the word "is" is"?

You guys have all the fun.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#56 Posted: Tue, Jun 19 2012, 3:19 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
tailgater wrote:
from God??

Man, your daddy beat you real good, didn't he?



You can't talk about Jerry Sandusky like that! He loved his boys! Snickerdoodles too!
FuzzNJ Offline
#57 Posted: Tue, Jun 19 2012, 3:53 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Tail.

I could actually get serious here and tell you about what 'rights' are and how they differ from laws.
I could explain how they are considered inalienable and traditionally explained as given from God.
I could define inalienable so you might understand that means no one can restrict you, ever from a right, which would exclude smoking then.
I could explain how in our country those rights are listed in the first 10 ammendments of our Constitution and none mention smoking.
Then we might want to get into a conversation about how really we have no rights at all, we only have what those with power allow us to have and any of these 'inalienable' rights can be taken away at any time.

But what would be the point?

You wouldn't read it and would just call me a f@g.

So I'll just say, you are a moron. Go read a book.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#58 Posted: Tue, Jun 19 2012, 4:25 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
Tail.

I could actually get serious here and tell you about what 'rights' are and how they differ from laws.
I could explain how they are considered inalienable and traditionally explained as given from God.
I could define inalienable so you might understand that means no one can restrict you, ever from a right, which would exclude smoking then.
I could explain how in our country those rights are listed in the first 10 ammendments of our Constitution and none mention smoking.
Then we might want to get into a conversation about how really we have no rights at all, we only have what those with power allow us to have and any of these 'inalienable' rights can be taken away at any time.

But what would be the point?

You wouldn't read it and would just call me a f@g.

So I'll just say, you are a moron. Go read a book.



Or we could just wait for your lord and savior, the Kenyan King...to sign another Executive Order!!!!
DrafterX Offline
#59 Posted: Tue, Jun 19 2012, 4:29 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
FuzzNJ wrote:
Tail.

I could actually get serious here and tell you about what 'rights' are and how they differ from laws.
I could explain how they are considered inalienable and traditionally explained as given from God.
I could define inalienable so you might understand that means no one can restrict you, ever from a right, which would exclude smoking then.
I could explain how in our country those rights are listed in the first 10 ammendments of our Constitution and none mention smoking.
Then we might want to get into a conversation about how really we have no rights at all, we only have what those with power allow us to have and any of these 'inalienable' rights can be taken away at any time.

But what would be the point?

You wouldn't read it and would just call me a f@g.

So I'll just say, you are a moron. Go read a book.




are we a bit paranoid today..?? Huh
DrMaddVibe Offline
#60 Posted: Tue, Jun 19 2012, 6:21 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
DrafterX wrote:
are we a bit paranoid today..?? Huh



Just today?Frying pan
tailgater Offline
#61 Posted: Wed, Jun 20 2012, 8:24 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
FuzzNJ wrote:
Tail.

I could actually get serious here and tell you about what 'rights' are and how they differ from laws.
I could explain how they are considered inalienable and traditionally explained as given from God.
I could define inalienable so you might understand that means no one can restrict you, ever from a right, which would exclude smoking then.
I could explain how in our country those rights are listed in the first 10 ammendments of our Constitution and none mention smoking.
Then we might want to get into a conversation about how really we have no rights at all, we only have what those with power allow us to have and any of these 'inalienable' rights can be taken away at any time.

But what would be the point?

You wouldn't read it and would just call me a f@g.

So I'll just say, you are a moron. Go read a book.



Fuzz, it wasn't me who was asking what a "right" was.
Legal definitions aside, it is not incorrect to use the term "right" when talking about our freedoms within the US.
I didn't bring God into this. That was you and your warped Sandusky-like childhood simply resurfacing at inopportune times.

I don't think I ever called you a f@g. You are many things, but I don't care about your sexual preferences.
Odd that you think along those lines, though, since it has nothing to do with the subject matter.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#62 Posted: Wed, Jun 20 2012, 9:00 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
tailgater wrote:
Fuzz, it wasn't me who was asking what a "right" was.
Legal definitions aside, it is not incorrect to use the term "right" when talking about our freedoms within the US.
I didn't bring God into this. That was you and your warped Sandusky-like childhood simply resurfacing at inopportune times.

I don't think I ever called you a f@g. You are many things, but I don't care about your sexual preferences.
Odd that you think along those lines, though, since it has nothing to do with the subject matter.





Ok, so now it's safe to say he's in pure victim mode. The US Government is against him. Wall Street is against him. Employment is against him. God given unalienable rights are against him. Rationality is against him. Common Sensibilities are against him. Racism is against him. The forum is against him.

He should just hop in a hole in the ground and do the world a favor. Maybe he posted his avatar as a scream for help?

Who cares. He's only a source of entertainment to me. Any time I think I'm having a bad day I read the posts he throws up and really try to believe there's a thinking person under that. It's in that moment that I know no matter how bad MY day is its better than the best day of that jerk's life!
tailgater Offline
#63 Posted: Wed, Jun 20 2012, 9:15 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Ok, so now it's safe to say he's in pure victim mode. The US Government is against him. Wall Street is against him. Employment is against him. God given unalienable rights are against him. Rationality is against him. Common Sensibilities are against him. Racism is against him. The forum is against him.

He should just hop in a hole in the ground and do the world a favor. Maybe he posted his avatar as a scream for help?

Who cares. He's only a source of entertainment to me. Any time I think I'm having a bad day I read the posts he throws up and really try to believe there's a thinking person under that. It's in that moment that I know no matter how bad MY day is its better than the best day of that jerk's life!


Well, except for the day each month when he's given his allowance.
HockeyDad Offline
#64 Posted: Wed, Jun 20 2012, 9:19 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
....or when the meds arrive!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#65 Posted: Wed, Jun 20 2012, 9:33 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
HockeyDad wrote:
....or when the meds arrive!



I thought that's what Honey Pot meant?

Think
bloody spaniard Offline
#66 Posted: Wed, Jun 20 2012, 10:52 AM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Ok, so now it's safe to say he's in pure victim mode. The US Government is against him. Wall Street is against him. Employment is against him. God given unalienable rights are against him. Rationality is against him. Common Sensibilities are against him. Racism is against him. The forum is against him.

He should just hop in a hole in the ground and do the world a favor. Maybe he posted his avatar as a scream for help?

Who cares. He's only a source of entertainment to me. Any time I think I'm having a bad day I read the posts he throws up and really try to believe there's a thinking person under that. It's in that moment that I know no matter how bad MY day is its better than the best day of that jerk's life!





Quite possibly the funniest (and cruelest) putdown I've ever read on the boards. LOL!
That's one strange avatar... Sounds like something Mengele might have said.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#67 Posted: Wed, Jun 20 2012, 11:19 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
bloody spaniard wrote:
Quite possibly the funniest (and cruelest) putdown I've ever read on the boards. LOL!
That's one strange avatar... Sounds like something Mengele might have said.



We don't make the avatar...we make avatar avatier
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Back to Top