America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by jetblasted. 43 replies replies.
Put me in charge the one plan that makes sense
SamWidge Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 09-05-2012
Posts: 205
PUT ME IN CHARGE . . .

Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of Lone Star cards; no
cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice
and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul
away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women
Norplant birth control implants or tubal legations. Then, we'll test
recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to reproduce
or use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military
barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of
repair. "Your home" will be subject to inspections anytime and
possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360,
then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each
week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the
roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we
find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires
and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the
"common good.."

Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that
all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.
Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self
esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone
else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered
self esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at
least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current
system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND While you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes,
that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You
will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving
a Gov't welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.
DrafterX Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
Think Think

what kind of cheese..?? Huh
havana1 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 09-28-2012
Posts: 135
In a perfect world.


However, these people living off of you and me have been doing it for so long they now feel
entitled to it.

But don't worry.....Obama is gonna fix all that!
DrafterX Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
I see no mention of Obamaphones & Obamanet.... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Not to pooh-pooh your plan...

But what happens when individuals decide for themselves that they don't like your rules (because odds are these are not people well adapted or inclined to follow rules) and decide to leave your assistance program. Instead they sleep in private charity supported shelters (run by churches) or on the street and commit petty crime or panhandle on the street for money?

I'd rather not have an increase in dirty vagrants lying on the street where I have to smell them.
Hell, there's now three that have taken to hanging out all day in the coffee shop I get my morning latte at. Dirty smelly vagrants.
DrafterX Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
what have you done to help them..??
bloody spaniard Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Hear hear, my good man, I say pip pip, jolly good job and all that rot. Don't forget to add that one must be a land owner in order to vote!

Now I'm sure it was an accidental oversight, old bean, but who's supposed to take care of my bitches and bas tards. Surely not ME??? Not talking
victor809 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
what have you done to help them..??


Why would I help them. They are consuming oxygen I'm sure I could find a use for.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,634
victor809 wrote:
Not to pooh-pooh your plan...

But what happens when individuals decide for themselves that they don't like your rules (because odds are these are not people well adapted or inclined to follow rules) and decide to leave your assistance program. Instead they sleep in private charity supported shelters (run by churches) or on the street and commit petty crime or panhandle on the street for money?

I'd rather not have an increase in dirty vagrants lying on the street where I have to smell them.
Hell, there's now three that have taken to hanging out all day in the coffee shop I get my morning latte at. Dirty smelly vagrants.



We could unleash the Kraken or put the Droogs out on the street...:-" in the rain...just :-" in the rain...is that okay?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWLByMshYIU


BUTTT...if'n days be a queen for a day...oh the hugh manatees!
DrafterX Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
Think I wonder who leashed and put away the Kraken in the first place..... Think
SamWidge Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 09-05-2012
Posts: 205
bloody spaniard wrote:
Don't forget to add that one must be a land owner in order to vote... ...but who's supposed to take care of my bitches and bas tards. Surely not ME??? Not talking


...i'm genuinely confused, aren't the answers self evident?

Why should they vote if they have no personal, tangible, physical, vested interest? This is why I have no vote at Facebooks POS annual meeting - I have no vested material interest in their organization.

Who shall take care of the little Spaniards? - please see paragraph 4 of the plan.

Really Spaniard, these questions are beneath you.
Brewha Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,207
SamWidge wrote:
...i'm genuinely confused, aren't the answers self evident?


The burning accuracy of this statement illuminates the entire post.
And to the second statement – apparently not.
victor809 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
SamWidge wrote:
...i'm genuinely confused, aren't the answers self evident?

Why should they vote if they have no personal, tangible, physical, vested interest? This is why I have no vote at Facebooks POS annual meeting - I have no vested material interest in their organization.

Unless your intent is to only grant citizenship to land-owners, one would argue that owning land in the US is not the definition of having a vested interest in the organization.

What about individuals who choose to get rid of homes and move into apartments for ease of maintenance?
One could legitimately run an entire business out of rented space, employ 1000's of people without being a property owner of the business or their own personal property. (Yes this does happen, one of our facilities has been operated out of rented space for over a decade, with a few millions of dollars of sunk upgrades just in the past 3 years)
HockeyDad Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,213
victor809 wrote:
U
One could legitimately run an entire business out of rented space, employ 1000's of people without being a property owner of the business or their own personal property. (Yes this does happen, one of our facilities has been operated out of rented space for over a decade, with a few millions of dollars of sunk upgrades just in the past 3 years)



Since when do businesses vote?
teedubbya Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
poor people suck
victor809 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
HockeyDad wrote:
Since when do businesses vote?


Business owners vote.
Business owners (job creators) could theoretically run an entire business without owning any physical land in the US. His plan would not allow these individuals to vote... just pointing out a hole.
HockeyDad Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,213
Maybe the business owner should buy a house.
victor809 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
HockeyDad wrote:
Maybe the business owner should buy a house.


Why would he be required to?
If he has sufficient income that paying rent is convenient and not a financial issue, why not rent? I know individuals who found that property ownership isn't something they want to do. Hell, I don't know what I will do when I sell my condo, but I sure as hell wouldn't like the idea that my voting rights would be tied to whether I purchased more property.
HockeyDad Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,213
victor809 wrote:
Why would he be required to?
If he has sufficient income that paying rent is convenient and not a financial issue, why not rent? I know individuals who found that property ownership isn't something they want to do. Hell, I don't know what I will do when I sell my condo, but I sure as hell wouldn't like the idea that my voting rights would be tied to whether I purchased more property.



He would be required to if he wanted to vote. I understand you wouldn't like that requirement for yourself but who cares what you want. Our government could care less what you want and its not about to start caring now. You should be happy you even get one vote right now and that Pfizer and United Health don't get a million votes each.
victor809 Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
HockeyDad wrote:
He would be required to if he wanted to vote. I understand you wouldn't like that requirement for yourself but who cares what you want. Our government could care less what you want and its not about to start caring now. You should be happy you even get one vote right now and that Pfizer and United Health don't get a million votes each.


While I have no problem with the idea that the gov't doesn't care what I want, I'd like to point out that it really doesn't care what Sam wants either. I'm just pointing out holes in his plan (that the government didn't ask him for).

Hell, we can go one step further, if property ownership were to be a requirement, you know that an enterprising individual would buy a huge tract of land in the middle of nowhere and start re-selling 1sq ft parcels for a profit to people interested in gaining voting rights cheaply. This of course would cause Sam to have a fit and require voting rights be tied to the amount of property owned.... next thing you know, ranchers and farmers have 90% of the voting rights... this probably wouldn't be good for our economy.
DrafterX Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
Think
Obamaland for the poor... ThumpUp
SamWidge Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 09-05-2012
Posts: 205
victor809 wrote:
Unless your intent is to only grant citizenship to land-owners, one would argue that owning land in the US is not the definition of having a vested interest in the organization.

What about individuals who choose to get rid of homes and move into apartments for ease of maintenance?
One could legitimately run an entire business out of rented space, employ 1000's of people without being a property owner of the business or their own personal property. (Yes this does happen, one of our facilities has been operated out of rented space for over a decade, with a few millions of dollars of sunk upgrades just in the past 3 years)


Perhaps I should clarify, this wasn't actually a plan.... it wouldn't actually work.... we couldn't really do this.... i was kidding....

....i apologize sincerely for the confusion.
teedubbya Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
great. another politician
DrMaddVibe Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,634
SamWidge wrote:
Perhaps I should clarify, this wasn't actually a plan.... it wouldn't actually work.... we couldn't really do this.... i was kidding....

....i apologize sincerely for the confusion.



Oh, c'mon...do you apologize for poking a stick at a beached jellyfish?


Same thing.


Laugh it off...that's the beauty in it!
DrafterX Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
poor beached jellyfish...... Sad
victor809 Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
SamWidge wrote:
Perhaps I should clarify, this wasn't actually a plan.... it wouldn't actually work.... we couldn't really do this.... i was kidding....

....i apologize sincerely for the confusion.


Lack of follow-through.


That's what's the problem with america today.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,634
DrafterX wrote:
poor beached jellyfish...... Sad



Yeah they're poor Captain Obvious...they don't have pockets to put wallets stuffed with money in!
DrafterX Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
noone ever tries to throw the jellyfish back in da water like the starfish..... Mellow
DrMaddVibe Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,634
DrafterX wrote:
noone ever tries to throw the jellyfish back in da water like the starfish..... Mellow



Patrick is stupid...he needs help...he's the Ocean's version of Rainman.

HockeyDad Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,213
victor809 wrote:
Lack of follow-through.


That's what's the problem with america today.



Well....that and the gays trying to crush Chick-Fil-A.
SamWidge Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 09-05-2012
Posts: 205
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Oh, c'mon...do you apologize for poking a stick at a beached jellyfish?


Same thing.


Laugh it off...that's the beauty in it!


I wasn't actually all that sorry.... If I'm to be really transparent here, I was more concerned with what could potentially happy should I end up in a trade with one of the offended...

The thought of what someone could do to a cigar BEFORE they sent it to me vexes me...

Had I desperately confused and befuddled a poor sole, there would be to telling what they could have done or where they could have put the stick before I put it in my mouth...

I wanted to appease them before something tragic happened...
wheelrite Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Sam obviously hasn't been laid in a long time...


SamWidge Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 09-05-2012
Posts: 205
wheelrite wrote:
Sam obviously hasn't been laid in a long time...




....a very, VERY long time...
victor809 Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
SamWidge wrote:
I wasn't actually all that sorry.... If I'm to be really transparent here, I was more concerned with what could potentially happy should I end up in a trade with one of the offended...

The thought of what someone could do to a cigar BEFORE they sent it to me vexes me...

Had I desperately confused and befuddled a poor sole, there would be to telling what they could have done or where they could have put the stick before I put it in my mouth...

I wanted to appease them before something tragic happened...


Huh....
An interesting plan, to try to both offend and trade with the individuals on this board.

I think you'd want to do one or the other, probably shouldn't try to do both.

That and stop fantasizing about bloody sticking cigars between his hairy butt-cheeks...
wheelrite Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
SamWidge wrote:
....a very, VERY long time...


ping Jade...
DrMaddVibe Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,634
victor809 wrote:
Huh....
An interesting plan, to try to both offend and trade with the individuals on this board.

I think you'd want to do one or the other, probably shouldn't try to do both.

That and stop fantasizing about bloody sticking cigars between his hairy butt-cheeks...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO1Q7F23DxM
SamWidge Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 09-05-2012
Posts: 205
DrMaddVibe wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO1Q7F23DxM


...hey Wheel ~ penny for your thoughts?
teedubbya Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
wheelrite wrote:
ping Jade...


is that gay code for multiple finger action?
JadeRose Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
Use the poor for medical experiments and when they die.....food.
drywalldog Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
Judge, jury and executioner, the rightious have a new leader, and he shall be named Samuel the self rightious. He shall release the rich from the bonds of helping poor, as set forth by the great redistributer Jesus. Only thing is, the last shall be first
drywalldog Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
And the first shall be last. Camels and eyes of needles, and last and best, judge not, lest you be judged.
drywalldog Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
HD, I am sure the healthcare companies got 250 million votes in this election.
jetblasted Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
I stopped for gas on the way home from work the other night at a gas station near the airport. I often avoid this gas station in such a respectable neighborhood as the station is in, and the myriad of gentlemen relaxing outside the station who always ask me to "hold'' one of my dollars, but I digress.

When I was inside paying for my purchase, I noticed a woman yelling at the clerk calling him a mother - ****, because he misunderstood what color blunt wrap she had requested. She paid for her several bottles of soda & chips with a EBT card, and then purchased $20 of lottery tickets, paid for in cash.

I thought briefly about intervening & helping to translate, but the myriad of bystanders standing around with their pants around their knees made me just make my purchase & expedite my departure of the establishment.
Users browsing this topic
Guest