America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

You can't see the difference? Really? Mourdock never claimed that he had direct authority from God to say what he said. It was what he personally believed. If Mourdock claimed he had a letter, E-mail, etc. directly from God, and he was keeping it from the public, then the two situations would be similar.

Obama CLAIMS that his transcripts say one thing, yet has done everything he can to hide them from the public.

I can't believe that you can't see that the two situations are not even close to being the same. Come on Victor, you'er smarter then this.

Somebody should offer Flynt a million to unearth & stuff Althea.

True to some degree. Mitt has a substantial paper trail of some kind however- going back to his dad. Obama doesn't. Everything from his birth, family, & credentials appears fabricated in Hollywood.

OK, mis-spoke. Let me clarify. Obama is deliberately hiding his transcripts from the American public. Mourdock is not hiding anything, so the two situations are not even close. If Flynt had offered Romney $1,000,000 to release his tax returns, then the situations would have been similar.

I'm gonna go way out on a limb here and say that a public analysis of Romney's tax returns would reveal the following earth shattering secrets:

1. He's a very wealthy man
2. He's taken every conceivable legal tax write off.*
3. His tax return has already been checked, rechecked, reviewed, and checked yet again by the experts at the IRS.
4. There's one fact that pi$$es of the liberals more than any other: he's a very wealthy man, and he's not 'one of us'.
5. He's a very wealthy man.

*Tax avoidance, which is perfectly legal according to the IRS...as opposed to tax evasion, which is not.

I can buy that. But would you actually be okay with it? I sure as hell wouldn't be okay with Flynt offering romney $MM for his tax returns. That's just as stupid as trump's play.