tailgater wrote:OK.
In post #9, I wanted to know what was untrue regarding my opening post.
My original text:
She is a despicable child of the entitlement generation.
The issue of who pays for female contraception is not about gender equality or a right to control the reproductive capacity, yet that's how most of the liberals perceived it and then perpetuated it.
So, yes. She had an impact on America 2012.
But her nominiation will not be met with indifference or with deserved notoriety.
Rather, she will be praised by the media and the liberal lemmings who failed to comprehend what the term "access" means when dealing with contraception
Tell me where I waivered from the truth.
Tell me why you've spent a dozen posts to tell me I am somehow wrong for making these statements.
And again... I said that you were correct at the basest level, but in your depiction of the situation, completely neglected to include anything the GOP did, therefore lying by omission. If I get in a fight at a bar, and neglect to mention the part where I first tell the guy that his mother is a whore, but just tell everyone that "the guy just hit me". I'm lying by omission. Kind of the same situation.
Lets see here:
"She is a despicable child of the entitlement generation.
The media used her to paint conservatives as being anti-women even though this subject has zero relevance toward that end. The issue of who pays for female contraception is not about gender equality or a right to control the reproductive capacity, yet that's how most of the liberals perceived it and then perpetuated it.
So, yes. She had an impact on America 2012.
But her nominiation will not be met with indifference or with deserved notoriety.
Rather, she will be praised by the media and the liberal lemmings who failed to comprehend what the term "access" means when dealing with contraception"
In your views, she apparently claimed she was entitled to birth control (your use of the word entitled), which is incorrect, which when they said "no" the conservatives were painted as "anti-women".
You're neglecting the following:
1 - The panel, in which the coverage of birth control was going to be discussed, was only populated by priests and old men. She was considered "unqualified". That's like having hearings on allowing smoking in cigar bars without allowing any bar-owners or smokers to be heard.
2 - Rush Limbaugh and the rest of his crowd. They make it too easy.
So yeah, "Democrats painted Republicans as anti-women".... after republicans said they didn't want to hear from women and that any who ask about financial assistance with their birth control are whores.
Seriously, this isn't a big deal. She would fade into oblivion if you guys could just shut up about how "despicable" you think she is....