America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by SMGBobbyScott. 16 replies replies.
at it again......
ZRX1200 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,673
REPORT: The US Is Openly Sending Heavy Weapons From Libya To Syrian Rebels

by Geoffrey Ingersoll and Michael Kelley | Dec. 9, 2012, 4:20 PM | 7,161

The Obama administration has decided to launch a covert operation to send heavy weapons to Syrian rebels, Christina Lamb of The Sunday Times of London reports.

Diplomatic sources told the Sunday Times that the U.S. "bought weapons from the stockpiles of Libya's former dictator Muammar Gaddafi."

The heavy arms include mortars, rocket propelled grenades, anti-tank missiles and the controversial anti-aircraft heat-seeking SA-7 missiles, which are integral to countering Bashar Al-Assad's bombing campaign.

Many have suspected that the US was already involved in sending heavy arms.

The administration has said that the previously hidden CIA operation in Benghazi involved finding, repurchasing and destroying heavy weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals, but in October we reported evidence indicating that U.S. agents — particularly murdered ambassador Chris Stevens — were at least aware of heavy weapons moving from Libya to jihadist Syrian rebels.

There have been several possible SA-7 spottings in Syria dating as far back as early summer 2012, and there are indications that at least some of Gaddafi's 20,000 portable heat-seeking missiles were shipped before now.

On Sept. 6 a Libyan ship carrying 400 tons of weapons for Syrian rebels docked in southern Turkey. The ship's captain was "a Libyan from Benghazi" who worked for the new Libyan government. The man who organized that shipment, Tripoli Military Council head Abdelhakim Belhadj, worked directly with Stevens during the Libyan revolution.

Stevens' last meeting on Sept. 11 was with Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, and a source told Fox News that Stevens was in Benghazi "to negotiate a weapons transfer in an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of Libya-based extremists."

Last month The Wall Street Journal reported that the State Department presence in Benghazi "provided diplomatic cover" for the now-exposed CIA annex. It follows that the "weapons transfer" that Stevens negotiated may have involved sending heavy weapons recovered by the CIA to the revolutionaries in Syria.

The newest report comes days before the U.S. is expected to recognize the newest Syrian coalition as the legitimate representative of the Syrian people. The State Department has also indicated it will soon name the opposition's highly effective al-Nusra Front a "terrorist organization" for its ties to Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI).

Both of these stipulations — recognition of a unified opposition and creation of distance from extremists — are pivotal in order for the Obama administration to openly acknowledge supporting Syrian rebels with heavy weapons.
Philly Jack Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 08-31-2012
Posts: 1,791
Not very covert if you and all of the UK know about it now is it
ZRX1200 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,673
Dems threw a tissy when Ollie n Ronnie did this....
Philly Jack Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 08-31-2012
Posts: 1,791
Don't you go talking about RR wanted to dig him up a month ago just so I could vote for a good candidate
rfenst Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,447
ZRX1200 wrote:
Dems threw a tissy when Ollie n Ronnie did this....


I think that had more to do with North illegally funding the Sandinistas than the covert sale of arms to Iran.
HockeyDad Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,199
rfenst wrote:
I think that had more to do with North illegally funding the Sandinistas than the covert sale of arms to Iran.



I'm sure the Democrats would have been fine with it and even encouraged it otherwise.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,590
Free Arms for Iran*









































* - With the purchase of hands and feet!

This advertisement has been Sharia Law approved.

rfenst Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,447
My take on all this is that Hussein's rule is over. It's just a matter of how long it will take. The longer it goes on, however, the greater the chance it will spill over into Turkey, Lebanon and Israel. It may be the rebels lobbing stuff over the borders or it may be Hussian. Either way, that's not a good thing.

And, while I don't like the idea of giving anyone in Syria any U.S. money without getting something worthwhile and definitive in return, I think "hedging our bet" just a bit by assisting the rebels some, could (but highly likely won't) accomplish something for the U.S., particularly if non-Islamist factions (yeah, right!) ultimately take Syria's control.

As to the independent concept of paying to getting arms out of Libya, I have no problem with that.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,590
rfenst wrote:
My take on all this is that Hussein's rule is over. It's just a matter of how long it will take. The longer it goes on, however, the greater the chance it will spill over into Turkey, Lebanon and Israel. It may be the rebels lobbing stuff over the borders or it may be Hussian. Either way, that's not a good thing.

And, while I don't like the idea of giving anyone in Syria any U.S. money without getting something worthwhile and definitive in return, I think "hedging our bet" just a bit by assisting the rebels some, could (but highly likely won't) accomplish something for the U.S., particularly if non-Islamist factions (yeah, right!) ultimately take Syria's control.

As to the independent concept of paying to getting arms out of Libya, I have no problem with that.




F dat!


Nuke them all...Let God sort them out.
rfenst Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,447
DrMaddVibe wrote:
F dat!


Nuke them all...Let God sort them out.


That concept is "a given"...
DrMaddVibe Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,590
rfenst wrote:
That concept is "a given"...



I want ROI for my taxpaying dollars!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,590
ZRX1200 wrote:
REPORT: The US Is Openly Sending Heavy Weapons From Libya To Syrian Rebels



And it was all worth killing an American ambassador and 3 others to maintain the cover!

We're #1!!!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,590
Obama May Have Supplied Arms Used in Benghazi Attack

Why would the Obama administration spend two weeks parroting a ridiculous story about a “protest turned violent” because of an anti-Muslim YouTube video being the cause of the attack on the Benghazi consulate?

Why would they then spend a month blaming the CIA for bad intel?

Why would they then comb through a former four-star general’s, then CIA-chief Petraeus’ email to “uncover” an adulterous affair that apparently everyone—including Obama—already knew about?

Fox News has been reporting that Obama, through Christopher Stevens, had been shipping Libyan arms to the Syrian rebels, some of them linked to al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Was this the reason Obama has been turning his administration into a pretzel trying to explain why he blamed a YouTube video for the murder of four Americans?

Was this the reason he refused to send in air or ground support to the dozens of Americans under fire, where Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods begged for help for upwards of seven hours and were eventually slaughtered?

Or was it something more?

What if it was the Fast and Furious debacle all over again, but this time in the Middle East and North Africa?

What if Barack Hussein Obama supplied the weapons to the al-Qaeda-linked group Ansar al-Sharia that murdered the Americans in Benghazi?

And if he would have sent in troops to help the Americans under attack at the Benghazi consulate and CIA safe house, it would have been discovered that the weapons had been supplied by the United States.

According to a New York Times article published yesterday that admits Obama-sanctioned weapons got into the hands of jihadists—and the article appears to be chocked full of leaked information from the White House in order to control the explosion of some new revelation—this in fact may be the case.

The New York Times, like a prim schoolmarm, assures the reader, twice mind you—the first time in the second paragraph—that “no evidence has surfaced that any weapons went to Ansar al-Shariah, an extremist group blamed for the Benghazi attack.”

Why are they so sure of this?

Well, they don’t say.

They do seem to know the name of the American arms dealer—Marc Turi—who brokered the arms deal.

They do seem to know that Obama officials secretly met with Qatar officials who were steeped in supplying Islamic extremists with weapons.

They do seem to know information that could only have come from Barack Obama himself.

Is there anything this President doesn’t have his fingers in?

It’s like Chicago in the Twenties and Thirties all over again!

We should call Obama the Al Capone of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue!

http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/
HockeyDad Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,199
Fricking Sand People.
DrafterX Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,588
Do da hustle.. Whistle
SMGBobbyScott Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2012
Posts: 3,328
ZRX...PLEASE CHANGE THAT AVATAR!!! Isn't it bad enough to make poor unsuspecting NOOBs look at that!
Users browsing this topic
Guest