America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by cacman. 8 replies replies.
we need more government.
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
ZRX1200 Offline
#1 Posted: Mon, Jan 14 2013, 6:32 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,673
EPA Defends Right to Regulate Rain

01/14/13

Can you believe the EPA wanted to regulate rain? It is true. They claim that rainfall can be considered a pollutant if there is too much of it and therefore they can regulate our handling of it.

From Freedomworks.org:

In the process of regulating everything under the sun, (literally) the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently made a bold grab at regulating everything from the clouds as well. More specifically, they had to defend themselves in a court case in Virginia for the right to regulate the rainfall.

The very fact that they would attempt something so bizarre is a clear indication that despite the departure of their red tape-wielding leader Lisa Jackson, the EPA has no intentions of easing off the regulatory gas pedal.

A Fox report explains why the EPA legitimately thought that rainwater could be regulated as a pollutant:

"The EPA contended that water itself can be regulated as a pollutant if there's too much of it. The agency says heavy runoff is having a negative impact on Accotink Creek and that it has the regulatory authority to remedy the situation.”
dpnewell Offline
#2 Posted: Mon, Jan 14 2013, 7:26 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
Wait a minute. So all we have to do is regulate rain and we can stop all these droughts and floods? Why didn’t someone think of this sooner?

Silly me, this is a Federal Government regulation. I forgot that means even more droughts, even more floods, and another trillion in debt to mis-manage it all.
SweetHavok Offline
#3 Posted: Mon, Jan 14 2013, 7:36 PM EST
Joined: 11-28-2012
Posts: 557
regulate rain ........ Confused




what the?
ZRX1200 Offline
#4 Posted: Mon, Jan 14 2013, 7:47 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,673
Believe it.

They've done it here locally. We had a local property owner (he has about 2-300 acres) that got a county permit for a pond. It was for fire supression and for emergency use (everyone in Shady Cove/Trail is well water.

AFTER HE BUILT IT the feds threw a fit and forced thegood limp wrist county officials to REVOKE the permit. AFTER IT WAS BUILT. So he fought a court battle and lost. While HE WAS IN JAIL the county FIRE DISTRICT USED THE POND TO FIGHT A FORREST FIRE (with his written permission)!!!!!!!
SweetHavok Offline
#5 Posted: Mon, Jan 14 2013, 8:02 PM EST
Joined: 11-28-2012
Posts: 557
that's freaking outrageous!
ZRX1200 Offline
#6 Posted: Mon, Jan 14 2013, 8:18 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,673
90 days in jail......
ZRX1200 Offline
#7 Posted: Mon, Jan 14 2013, 8:20 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,673
We had about a thousand people show up and protest.
cacman Offline
#8 Posted: Tue, Jan 15 2013, 12:50 AM EST
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
ZRX1200 wrote:
Believe it.

They've done it here locally. We had a local property owner (he has about 2-300 acres) that got a county permit for a pond. It was for fire supression and for emergency use (everyone in Shady Cove/Trail is well water.

AFTER HE BUILT IT the feds threw a fit and forced thegood limp wrist county officials to REVOKE the permit. AFTER IT WAS BUILT. So he fought a court battle and lost. While HE WAS IN JAIL the county FIRE DISTRICT USED THE POND TO FIGHT A FORREST FIRE (with his written permission)!!!!!!!

Heard of similar situations in CO, but related to land & water rights. A women installed a rain-water collection system for her property. Got in a ton of trouble due to an old rancher's law which prohibits the restriction of natural water flow to neighboring properties - back from the days when rancher's would damn rivers & creaks within their property. Huge court fight too but had to remove the system.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top