America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

IF ONLY WE DIDN'T ABORT THEM!!!!


They'd be 7 now!!!

I guess you better have a talk with your boy Harry. Ask him why, probably wants to hold onto his power by being re-elected, ya think ?

Uncle RICK I have no clue (as usual) WTF you are talking about. Did the senate shelf a weapons ban??



If so you do remember NO GODDAMN ASSAULT RIFLE WAS

U S E D

AT SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTING.


All people shot and killed were shot with HANDGUNS.




POOPY AGAIN YOU OLD GOAT.

The leader of the Democrat-controlled Senate on Tuesday dropped a proposed assault weapons ban from the chamber’s gun-control package – dealing a blow to supporters of the ban, though it could still come up for a vote.

The sponsor of the measure, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., revealed that Reid told her the proposed ban would not be in the initial package. Feinstein said she's "disappointed" with the decision, and is expected to nevertheless offer it as an amendment.

But the move by Reid to cut it from the main bill signals a lack of congressional support for a proposal that would not only revive, but strengthen, the decade-long ban that expired in 2004.

The proposed ban passed was passed last week by the Senate Judiciary Committee, along with three other measures. The others dealt with providing more school safety aid, expanding federal background checks on potential gun buyers and helping authorities prosecute illegal gun traffickers.

Feinstein has led the gun-control charge since President Obama called for federal legislation in the wake of the Newtown and other mass shootings.

The assault weapons ban was the most controversial of the major proposals to restrict guns that have been advanced by Obama and Senate Democrats. Because of that, it had been expected that the assault weapons measure would be left out of the initial package the Senate considers, with Democrats hoping the Senate could in turn amass the strongest possible vote for the overall legislation.

There are 53 Democrats in the Senate, plus two independents who usually vote with them.

Having a separate vote on assault weapons might free moderate Democratic senators facing re-election next year in Republican-leaning states to vote against the assault weapons measure, but then support the remaining overall package of gun curbs.

Gun control supporters consider a strong Senate vote important because the Republican-run House has shown little enthusiasm for most of Obama's proposals.

Feinstein said Reid told her there would be two additional votes. One would be on her assault weapons ban, which also includes a ban on ammunition magazines that carry more than 10 rounds. The second would just be on prohibiting the high-capacity magazine clips.

Many Democrats think the ban on large-capacity magazines has a better chance of getting 60 votes than the assault weapons ban



Film at 11......






I wouldn't be surprised if they threw it in at the last minute of a midnight vote or somethin tho....

I did hear that there's a bill to take handguns away from cranky old men who post gibberish. Now that's gun control I can stand behind.

Yet the Obama administration and his propaganda arm, the MSM, continue to lie to the American people and his supporters don't seem to mind one bit.

can I put a folding stock and a 8 round high capacity tube on it..??

Amen!!!!

At least he spelled right.

Pelosi is going to introduce it as an amendment to the bill.

I tested this by the way if you are more than about 9 yards I can dump the empty mag in my AR and speed reload so the concept that there will be "breaks in the spray of bullets" is moronic it would give you enough time that you would be engaged at between 4-6 yards which is like hitting a 4-6" putt for you golf guys, and for a mass shooter there is aways a new york reload.

Is that where the cops shove a plunger up the poop chute?

The question arises...
Can we ever really kill enough 6 year olds?

I feel like the goddamn things are breeding or something. everywhere I turn there's more of them. We've given people licenses to cull the deer herds... 6 year olds are just as diseased and a nuisance. And if you hit them with your car it does some serious damage.

so, is the gubment gonna whack some 6 year olds just so they can try to ban assault rifles again..??


or are they just sitting back waiting and hoping someone else does it for them......

He has a point. I mean....we'll make more.

well i have beautiful 5 & 6 year old daughters so i really dont find it that funny but i guess to each his own

Every Chuck E Cheese needs to be burned to the ground. those places are irreparably tainted as far as I'm concerned. Having to set foot in something like that is my own personal nightmare and no amount of bleach could make me feel clean after. And I'm not a germophobe... hell, I've lysed E.Coli in an open beaker with one hand while drinking my coffee in the other.

You're doing it all wrong. Reverse it.