America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 10 years ago by ZRX1200. 25 replies replies.
Kerry: Congress WILL Back Syria Strike! (please explain)
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
bloody spaniard Offline
#1 Posted: Sun, Sep 1 2013, 5:57 PM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Mr. Jenjizz Cahn seems awfully persistent despite developing amnesia on the abandonment of 40+ Americans in Benghazi. Any Democrat (or maverick like McLame) care to explain WHY this is so important to our national security???

Is this just another Barak Bluto Blutarsky Germans bombing Pearl Harbor moment cheered on by Spanky Biden and Alfalfa King?
bloody spaniard Offline
#2 Posted: Sun, Sep 1 2013, 7:57 PM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
To Hades with this rhetorical thread, I'll go to my dying bed with *hookers on each arm wondering about politicians and our corrupted, Constitution-less Government...

Cheers Beer




*female
8trackdisco Offline
#3 Posted: Sun, Sep 1 2013, 8:07 PM EST
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,097
Can't we just attack Assad while paying him a bailout at the same time?

For some reason, our government has the appearance of financial solvency.
ZRX1200 Offline
#4 Posted: Sun, Sep 1 2013, 9:24 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
We have all the money we can print 8track!
bloody spaniard Offline
#5 Posted: Mon, Sep 2 2013, 2:51 PM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
If you're quiet, you can hear Al Queda whimper.Crying
Common' Bluto, go to to the taxpayer ATM machine & send 'em a Tomahawk or two for Pete's sake! Even an ominous drone will do. Use one we mothballed during Benghazi!
DadZilla3 Offline
#6 Posted: Mon, Sep 2 2013, 5:26 PM EST
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
bloody spaniard wrote:
Any Democrat (or maverick like McLame) care to explain WHY this is so important to our national security???

Valerie Jarrett is actually running the show in the current administration; she'd be the one to explain why.
rfenst Offline
#7 Posted: Mon, Sep 2 2013, 6:18 PM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,379
Take out the radar, bomb storage and manufacturing, air force and facilities, rockets and scuds and the like. Leave him incapable of bombing and some shelling of non. Israel has already struck 3-4 times without impunity. It will be expensive, but worth it. Leave him with conventional weapons. This would be my wishlist if we attack.
wheelrite Offline
#8 Posted: Mon, Sep 2 2013, 7:22 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
rfenst wrote:
Take out the radar, bomb storage and manufacturing, air force and facilities, rockets and scuds and the like. Leave him incapable of bombing and some shelling of non. Israel has already struck 3-4 times without impunity. It will be expensive, but worth it. Leave him with conventional weapons. This would be my wishlist if we attack.


screw that,,,,

We have no biz doing that chit.....

Peace Out,,,

wheel,
rfenst Offline
#9 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 7:15 AM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,379
wheelrite wrote:
screw that,,,,

We have no biz doing that chit.....

Peace Out,,,

wheel,


I agree, but if we do...
rfenst Offline
#10 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 7:16 AM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,379
wheelrite wrote:
screw that,,,,

We have no biz doing that chit.....

Peace Out,,,

wheel,


I agree, but if we do...
HockeyDad Offline
#11 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 7:54 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
rfenst wrote:
I agree, but if we do...



If we do....impeach Obama.
bloody spaniard Offline
#12 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 9:31 AM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
That's ok. He trotted out the douchebag twins, McCain & Lindsey, to (hopefully) start a war conga line with their bongos.
Then Bluto went off golfing to plan his next step on behalf of the Syrian children.

Whatever happened to the theory that if we bomb them, we create more terrorists?Think
dstieger Offline
#13 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 9:58 AM EST
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I agree we have no business trying to directly influence the civil war one way or another. I'm OK with letting them continue to shoot each other with conventional arms. Civilian toll and refugee situations suck, but not up to US to 'fix' those. On the other hand, I think that chemical weapons falls into the WMD category and their use cannot be ignored -- by us or the rest of the civilized world. I'm prefectly fine with shoving a bunch of Tomahawks up his azz and making him (and Iran....and North Korea....and ????) think twice before trying it again. Rules for war is a funny concept, but I'm a fan of Geneva and UN conventions and protocols.
ZRX1200 Offline
#14 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:00 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
I'm a fan of the constitution.
ZRX1200 Offline
#15 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:06 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
Soetoro
McLame
Grahamnesty





These men agree with you. Think about that.
ZRX1200 Offline
#16 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:10 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
Bill Krystal agrees too.
HockeyDad Offline
#17 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:15 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
dstieger wrote:
I agree we have no business trying to directly influence the civil war one way or another. I'm OK with letting them continue to shoot each other with conventional arms. Civilian toll and refugee situations suck, but not up to US to 'fix' those. On the other hand, I think that chemical weapons falls into the WMD category and their use cannot be ignored -- by us or the rest of the civilized world. I'm prefectly fine with shoving a bunch of Tomahawks up his azz and making him (and Iran....and North Korea....and ????) think twice before trying it again. Rules for war is a funny concept, but I'm a fan of Geneva and UN conventions and protocols.



Syria is not a party to the Chemical Weapons Convention. Neither are Angola, Myanmar, Egypt, Israel, North Korea, and South Sudan. It prohibits the development, production, and use of chemical weapons. The USA still possesses chemical weapons.
bloody spaniard Offline
#18 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:16 AM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
ZRX1200 wrote:
Bill Krystal agrees too.

He's perfected the Fred Sanford fake uppercut, I'm gonna knock you out sucka move.
A hawk pantywaist who's never seen a war that he wouldn't want send others' kids to...

In a perfect world, creeps like this should be "volunteered" to do the fighting & foot the bill.
bloody spaniard Offline
#19 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:18 AM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
HockeyDad wrote:
Syria is not a party to the Chemical Weapons Convention. Neither are Angola, Myanmar, Egypt, Israel, North Korea, and South Sudan. It prohibits the development, production, and use of chemical weapons. The USA still possesses chemical weapons.


Since when do weapons' treaties matter? I'm sure the German, Japanese, and Russians violated one or two prior to world wars.
dstieger Offline
#20 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:18 AM EST
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Not even sure who Soetoro or Krystal are....for whatever that's worth.

But, as to McCain and Graham.,...from what I've heard - and I've not been paying a whole lot of attention - from what I've heard, McCain and Graham absolutely would disagree that we should simply punish for use of WMD. Both appear to believe that we have some moral obligation to punish Assad for the entire war and to remove him from office if we can do it - with limited casualties, of course. Laughable.
ZRX1200 Offline
#21 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:18 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
He's a neocon POS that has helped too many to their death.

He's a big gov't death merchant.

Just like Barry "dumbo" Soetoro and the NWO POS he worked for in the White House.
dstieger Offline
#22 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:25 AM EST
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Seems like odd political leaning for someone that keeps hosting the Academy Awards. I did like him in Soap and Running Scared, though.
bloody spaniard Offline
#23 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:30 AM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
dstieger wrote:
Seems like odd political leaning for someone that keeps hosting the Academy Awards. I did like him in Soap and Running Scared, though.

LOL! Jaime's referring to the editor of the Weekly Standard not the doughy- faced guy who's charmingly balding halfway up his head.
ZRX1200 Offline
#24 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 10:40 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
He knows that. He just hates that I'm right.
ZRX1200 Offline
#25 Posted: Tue, Sep 3 2013, 11:24 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
http://www.examiner.com/article/breaking-news-rebels-admit-gas-attack-result-of-mishandling-chemical-weapons
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top