DrMaddVibe wrote:Frank its the 3am phone call.
As a leader you have to think of every scenario. To act after an event is reactionary. Being able to think 3 steps ahead is a leadership.
She has the experience. She's a leader. She's bold enough to actually act without a script and when you're able to see the events after they were played out...almost perfectly. ..you're able to see the chess game afoot. She was the best of the four running and the reason why I even voted for grandpa tumorhead. He was outclassed, outspoken, outflanked by a governor with executive experience. The other 3 have none. 2 of them despite their title still don't. The other 3rd had sour grapes in his mouth.
The 2008 election was a wake-up call. America wanted the free stuff and a promise that there was hope and change on the horizon. Leadership doesn't promise a thing. It leads. When you see it you just know.
Doc, I understand how Americans feel about our current (lack of) leadership, but I am not clear on what she feels should be our reaction to the Russian invasion, and what are people agreeing with her about beyond dissatisfaction with Obama's response. What would be her response?
HD correctly pointed out that the situation is comparable to Russia getting all pissy at us if we invaded our neighbor. But what exactly is Palin saying the proper moves should be?
I don't see anything on her resume with this type of experience, no previous President had this type of experience either when sitting in a state elected position before becoming Prez...maybe a couple who had been Generals in times of war, but even they made mistakes.
edit; Hd's comments were made on a different Ukraine thread