America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 10 years ago by PorknBeans. 11 replies replies.
Humanist group sues to remove cross-shaped WWI memorial in Maryland
Burner02 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Here we go again!


Fox News = "A humanist advocacy group has filed a federal lawsuit to remove a cross-shaped World War I memorial in Prince George's County, alleging the display violates the First Amendment.

The American Humanist Association says it does not object to the fact that the Bladensburg Cross memorializes soldiers, but rather the placement of the Christian symbol on property owned by a government agency, The Daily Record reported.

"We are certainly recommending coming up with a monument inclusive of all religious groups," said Monica Miller, a lawyer with the association's Appignani Humanist Legal Center.

In 2012, the group sent a letter to the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission demanding that the cross be removed from the war memorial. The group said it would have no objection if the cross was on private land, MyFoxDC.com reported.

John Moss, the town's administrator, said the Bladensburg Cross is not endorsing any faith.

"The cross memorializes our veterans," he told The Daily Record. "It was never meant to be a religious icon."

The 40-foot-tall concrete memorial was erected in 1925 by the American Legion to commemorate the 49 men of Prince George's County who died during World War I.

The monument was initially owned by the state but was deeded in 1960 to the commission, which administers regional parks in Montgomery and Prince George's counties. The monument was restored and rededicated in 1965, according to The Daily Record.

According to the report, the lawsuit names as plaintiffs two local American Humanist Association members and a third individual -- each of whom had "unwelcome contact" with the monument.

Steven Lowe, a plaintiff from Washington, said was "shocked" when he first saw the cross and is "upset" whenever he passes it, according to the complaint obtained by the newspaper.

"He believes that the Bladensburg Cross associates a Christian religious symbol with the state and gives the impression that the state supports and approves of Christianity, as opposed to other religions, and that the state may even prefer Christians and Christianity over other religions," the complaint reads.

Moss, the town administrator, told The Daily Record this is the first time a lawsuit has been filed to remove the Bladensburg Cross. He said the memorial has "historic and patriotic" value.

"There are community members that would be disturbed if the cross were removed," he said."




ram27bat
mikey1597 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
How bout we send this Steven Lowe commie POS a one way ticket to Russia and see him off.
TMCTLT Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
mikey1597 wrote:
How bout we send this Steven Lowe commie POS a one way ticket to Russia and see him off.



LIKE Beer
jackconrad Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
In God we trust ...
Mr Roso Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 09-05-2013
Posts: 384
Ramen.
DrafterX Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,557
Think
if we start crucifying non-Christians on the cross again will these people stop..??? Huh
gryphonms Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Simple answer, move the cross to private land. Brings a question to mind. If a pentacle was built on government property would it offend you?

The first amendment states one religion cannot be shown preference over another by the government. The argument could be made on a constitutional basis that the cross should be removed even if no one objects.
victor809 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
gryphonms wrote:
Simple answer, move the cross to private land. Brings a question to mind. If a pentacle was built on government property would it offend you?

The first amendment states one religion cannot be shown preference over another by the government. The argument could be made on a constitutional basis that the cross should be removed even if no one objects.


http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2014/01/07/satanists-unveil-design-for-statehouse-statue/comment-page-39/
Burner02 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
gryphonms wrote:
Simple answer, move the cross to private land. Brings a question to mind. If a pentacle was built on government property would it offend you?

The first amendment states one religion cannot be shown preference over another by the government. The argument could be made on a constitutional basis that the cross should be removed even if no one objects.





"John Moss, the town's administrator, said the Bladensburg Cross is not endorsing any faith."

"The cross memorializes our veterans," he told The Daily Record. "It was never meant to be a religious icon."




d'oh!
dstieger Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Burner02 wrote:
"John Moss, the town's administrator, said the Bladensburg Cross is not endorsing any faith."

"The cross memorializes our veterans," he told The Daily Record. "It was never meant to be a religious icon."

d'oh!


Take a look at the cross. Dumb statement. Of course it is a religious icon. ...The statement is not as dumb as those making a federal case out of it, but dumb nonetheless. If Mr. Moss leaves his mouth shut, he wins. I suggest the Humanists pick their battles better.
PorknBeans Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 07-23-2013
Posts: 357
iffin your so upset when you see it look the other way ya big poosey
Users browsing this topic
Guest