America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by TMCTLT. 77 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
Obama Slammed By Black Chicago Residents: ‘Worst President Ever’
HockeyDad Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,135
teedubbya wrote:
What percentage of Chicagoans?



98.2%
DrafterX Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Laugh
victor809 Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
TMCTLT wrote:
You just refuse to stay On Topic.....YES Pretty Damn Quiet @ the three major news outlets. They're ALL so bust trying to sell his failed policies and propping this entire administration back up each and every time it falls on it's face with yet ANOTHER lie or cover up by Barry and company. So you have the floor......tell us all about his wonderful work.......d'oh!
And by the way, these little minor snafu's that keeping "popping up" are so no one notices how poorly his admin. Is failing....Period. Think Smoke and Mirrors baby


I find a great deal of irony in your claim I "refuse to stay on topic". My posts are only in response to your baseless statements, so if you find them off-topic you should consider what you wrote.

Now you want me to tell you about all "obama's wonderful work"??? (how's that staying on topic going for you, again?) Did you not read the post where I said I don't like the policies he's supported? Do you even bother to read things in their entirety?

As for the snafu's popping up. these aren't real snafus. They only become snafus because right-wing talking heads bring them up. If you think there is some smoke and mirrors, then you need to consider the source.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
DrafterX

lame Wong answer and demonstration od inability to research minimum degtail to aquire even the slightest information..

double dunce dodo.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
teedubbya wrote:
Funny how polls we don't like are always skewed but this is an acceptable level evidence.

I think Obama sucks too. Therefore dumb fatassses in flyover country all hate Obama.



This article isn't about polling data. Watch the YouTube video...they're pissed off...and they deserve to be.

Clownshoes wants amnesty off the backs of people in danger.

If only they could change course...but they won't...they didn't...now it's all there for EVERYONE to see!

The Kenyan King will go down as the worst American President...EVER!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
DrafterX

lame Wong answer and demonstration od inability to research minimum degtail to aquire even the slightest information..

double dunce dodo.



LIME JELLO IN THE DAYROOM OUTRAGE!!!
gryphonms Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Does anyone know how many people were at this protest? I have been looking for that without any success.
TMCTLT Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
gryphonms wrote:
Does anyone know how many people were at this protest? I have been looking for that without any success.



Doesn't matter as you'll never be able to figure out how many " others " the protestors represented who couldn't be there, kinda like the Original Tea Party March on Washington.
gryphonms Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Actually my question had nothing to do with others who could not be there. I am curious about how many were actually there. Usually the number of protestors is listed some where. If it matters or not has nothing to do with the question.
DrafterX Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
DrafterX

lame Wong answer and demonstration od inability to research minimum degtail to aquire even the slightest information..

double dunce dodo.



damn..... Sad





I heard Axl wrote that song.... Mellow
TMCTLT Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
[quote=gryphonms]Actually my question had nothing to do with others who could not be there. I am curious about how many were actually there. Usually the number of protestors is listed some where. If it matters or not has nothing to do with the question.[/

Damn, sorry I responded @ all. Carry on with your worthless F' n questions
gryphonms Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
If you are going to respond you really should respond to the question. What I find worthless are your responses that make no sense because they are statements supporting your POV instead of an actual response.
DrafterX Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Think
TMCTLT Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
gryphonms wrote:
If you are going to respond you really should respond to the question. What I find worthless are your responses that make no sense because they are statements supporting your POV instead of an actual response.



I did respond to your valueless question sir....enjoy your day Beer Read back...I offered NO point of view just clarity
gryphonms Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Read your own valueless post. #28. You offered the opinion that the number of protesters does not matter. Do you really have that hard of a time understanding what you wrote? That was an opinion, it offers no clarity. In fact to me it shows a juvenile level of needing to be seen as an expert in an area where you are not.
DrafterX Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
thanks for clearing that up Dr Phil..... Mellow
TMCTLT Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
gryphonms wrote:
Read your own valueless post. #28. You offered the opinion that the number of protesters does not matter. Do you really have that hard of a time understanding what you wrote? That was an opinion, it offers no clarity. In fact to me it shows a juvenile level of needing to be seen as an expert in an area where you are not.




valueless question smart guy....
gryphonms Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Again, your opinion.
TMCTLT Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
gryphonms wrote:
Again, your opinion.



No sir it's a fact....your question has NO value in the stated conversation....what does it matter how many turned out? Would they not be representative of a larger number? So seriously....tell me why you'd like to know how many were there? Where does this question lead?
gryphonms Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
I disagree with you, if it was say 100 protesters it would not be a large enough group to determine if they accurately represent the black community. If it was 50% of the black community it would be much more likely they did represent the black community. Obviously both numbers are at the far end of the spectrum. But to say the number does not matter is incorrect in my opinion. If you really think a very small number of people is representative of a large group then you need to study statistical analysis.
TMCTLT Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
gryphonms wrote:
I disagree with you, if it was say 100 protesters it would not be a large enough group to determine if they accurately represent the black community. If it was 50% of the black community it would be much more likely they did represent the black community. Obviously both numbers are at the far end of the spectrum. But to say the number does not matter is incorrect in my opinion. If you really think a very small number of people is representative of a large group then you need to study statistical analysis.



No I don't need to study anything, I understand that EVERYTHING has a slant to it as everyone has an " agenda " that they hope to further with " their " information while discounting others who might actually contain more facts. In this case it's a bunch of people experiencing " buyers remorse "
gryphonms Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Actally I agree with everything you just said and now understand why you think the numbers have no meaning. I always do the math. For me it is a way of proving or disproving something. In this case I am looking for proof of this group actually representing the majority of black Chicagoans. I believe they do, however I feel the number of people at the protest is relevant.
DrafterX Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
d'oh!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
gryphonms wrote:
Actally I agree with everything you just said and now understand why you think the numbers have no meaning. I always do the math. For me it is a way of proving or disproving something. In this case I am looking for proof of this group actually representing the majority of black Chicagoans. I believe they do, however I feel the number of people at the protest is relevant.



If it's even 5 "black Chicagoans"...the wheels are falling off the Kenyan King's cart.

victor809 Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
TMCTLT wrote:
No I don't need to study anything, I understand that EVERYTHING has a slant to it as everyone has an " agenda " that they hope to further with " their " information while discounting others who might actually contain more facts. In this case it's a bunch of people experiencing " buyers remorse "


HAHAHAHAHAHA

If you don't need to study anything, how do you know "your" information has more facts?

there's a very simple statistical science to extrapolating numbers. Both sides of the aisle do it. To say the number of people at a rally doesn't matter because "everything has a slant to it" makes no sense and discounts the work of thousands of political analysts on both sides of the fence.
teedubbya Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrMaddVibe wrote:
If it's even 5 "black Chicagoans"...the wheels are falling off the Kenyan King's cart.




There have likely been more than 5 since day 1. What is funny is these are folks whose opinion is likely discarded in every instance but this (by most folks in here).
TMCTLT Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
HAHAHAHAHAHA

If you don't need to study anything, how do you know "your" information has more facts?

there's a very simple statistical science to extrapolating numbers. Both sides of the aisle do it. To say the number of people at a rally doesn't matter because "everything has a slant to it" makes no sense and discounts the work of thousands of political analysts on both sides of the fence.




Like I said......Simple Buyers Remorsed'oh!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12