dstieger wrote:Apples and apricots. Anyone who considers Rush a 'news source' either isn't too bright or isn't really trying.
He's a verbal blogger -- an editorialist -- don't think he ever claimed to be anything more
That's only true to an extent. One can't "factcheck" an opinion, so anything he's been found to be lying about is something he claimed to be true. While his "editorial" may be what he's selling as a bill of goods, the "facts" he's using to support his opinion are apparently being found to be wrong an inordinate amount of times. This is still dangerous.