America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by DrafterX. 26 replies replies.
Poor Hilldog
ZRX1200 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state, State Department officials said, and may have violated federal requirements that officials’ correspondence be retained as part of the agency’s record.

Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act.

It was only two months ago, in response to a new State Department effort to comply with federal record-keeping practices, that Mrs. Clinton’s advisers reviewed tens of thousands of pages of her personal emails and decided which ones to turn over to the State Department. All told, 55,000 pages of emails were given to the department.Mrs. Clinton stepped down from the secretary’s post in early 2013.

Her expansive use of the private account was alarming to current and former National Archives and Records Administration officials and government watchdogs, who called it a serious breach.

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level-head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle and Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the “letter and spirit of the rules.”

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

Mrs. Clinton is not the first government official — or first secretary of state — to use a personal email account on which to conduct official business.

But her exclusive use of her private email, for all of her work, appears unusual, Mr. Baron said. The use of private email accounts is supposed to be limited to emergencies, experts said, such as when an agency’s computer server is not working.

“I can recall no instance in my time at the National Archives when a high-ranking official at an executive branch agency solely used a personal email account for the transaction of government business,” said Mr. Baron, who worked at the agency from 2000 to 2013.

Regulations from the National Archives and Records Administration at the time required any emails sent or received from personal accounts be preserved as part of the agency’s records.

But Mrs. Clinton and her aides failed to do so.
rfenst Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
Uh-o!
ZRX1200 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
This was from a righty website, but was linked from two "major papers" so this isn't a one source story FYI.
rfenst Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
ZRX1200 wrote:
This was from a righty website, but was linked from two "major papers" so this isn't a one source story FYI.


I don't doubt it one bit maybe the scandle will stick this time.
HockeyDad Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
rfenst wrote:
I don't doubt it one bit maybe the scandle will stick this time.



That would suck because they're already planning her inauguration parties.
teedubbya Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
probably because this didn't work

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/06/04/188616705/ap-top-obama-officials-use-secret-email-accounts
DrafterX Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
heard about this... all the Benghazi stuff is hidden away on her yahoo account somewhere.... along with nip slips of Christina Aguilar... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Obama has stated he will pardon her tho... nothing to see here... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I heard she was sorry
Burner02 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Clinton's play by a different set of rules.
DrafterX Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
teedubbya wrote:
I heard she was sorry



Ya well, sorry didn't find CROS did it... Mad
Brewha Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Poor CROS.....
DrafterX Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Ya... poor CROS... Sad
TMCTLT Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Nothing about this woman surprises me.....Nothing!!!!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
"What does it matter?"
fiddler898 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
DrafterX wrote:
heard about this... all the Benghazi stuff is hidden away on her yahoo account somewhere.... along with nip slips of Christina Aguilar... Mellow


And we all know how secure & impregnable Yahoo is, right? Looks like this is a case of hiding stuff in plain sight!
DrafterX Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
I was just kiddin about Yahoo.... I think she had her own private e-mail server and domain and stuff set up in her basement at home.... not sure exactly home that works.. Think
victor809 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
A synopsis of why it was dumb of Clinton to set up her own email server.

http://gizmodo.com/why-hillary-clintons-homebrew-email-is-a-security-night-1689470576
gryphonms Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
This one is interesting.
DrafterX Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
quote from some bassard on Victor's link...

Here is what really makes it a political ****storm.

The Federal Retention Act that she seems to have violated specifically has punishment that includes forfeiture of future Federal Offices.

In other words, if the Republicans can convict her of this, she will be immediately and unquestionably be disqualified from being President.

So it goes way beyond just tarnishing her reputation in an attempt to siphon votes.


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071


Think Think
teedubbya Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I hope this one sticks on her because it is purely intentional.
gryphonms Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
^ agreed.
DrafterX Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
teedubbya wrote:
I hope this one sticks on her because it is purely intentional.




every dog will have her day... Mellow
ZRX1200 Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/03/flashback-hillary-attacks-bush-officials-for-secret-email-accounts-video/
Krazeehorse Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
rfenst wrote:
I don't doubt it one bit maybe the scandle will stick this time.

The indictment will be delivered by the Easter Bunny.
DrafterX Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
She will be pardoned.... and she knows it.... It doesn't matter.... Mellow
Users browsing this topic
Guest