America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by gummy jones. 38 replies replies.
Democrat culture of corruption
MACS Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,840
http://tinyurl.com/jp7p4v4


An Arizona Democratic lawmaker who once voted against welfare fraud protections in her state has been indicted on felony charges of defrauding the food stamp program.

According to the indictment unsealed earlier this week, state Rep. Cecilia Velasquez was charged with three felony counts: unlawful use of food stamps, fraudulent schemes and practices, and theft.

The Arizona Department of Economic Security began investigating Velasquez in 2014. According to the Arizona DES, Velasquez fraudulently used $1,726 worth of food stamps between 2013 and 2015.

This past February, Velasquez had voted against a bill aimed at giving the same state agency stronger anti-fraud tools – a program that could have quickly detected her alleged fraudulent activity.

Arizona state Rep. Anthony Kern, who sponsored the House bill, called the indictment “sad.”

“It is appalling that an elected official representing the people of Arizona would steal from the poor, while consistently saying she is trying to help the poor,” Kern told Fox News.

Josh Archambault, senior fellow with the Foundation for Government Accountability, pointed to the failed legislation as the kind of measures the country needs to tackle fraud.

“There is so much low-hanging fruit to catch in this country when it comes to welfare fraud, and sadly, every day that goes by without reform allows for abuse and steals resources from the truly needy,” Archambault told Fox News.

Velasquez’s indictment was announced this week after an investigation by several state agencies.

According to Arizona Inspector General Juan J. Arcellana, the investigation began with a tip in November 2014.

“The indictment of State Representative Velasquez is the culmination of an extensive multi-year investigation,” Arcellana said in a statement. “The forthcoming judicial proceedings will ensure due process for the involved parties.”

Velasquez’s office has not responded to Fox News’ request for comment.

The initial hearing is set for July 5 in Maricopa County Superior Court.

News at 11, right Drafter?
Buckwheat Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Pretty FN low if she is convicted. Defrauding a food stamp program. WTF? ram27bat
Gene363 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,850
If they'll do it for you, they damn sure will do it to you.
Brewha Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
This is shameful.
At least when the Repulicans pull this kind of crap Fox keeps it quiet.....
ZRX1200 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
Or this:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=AY-F5JoHoho
Buckwheat Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Brewha wrote:
This is shameful.
At least when the Repulicans pull this kind of crap Fox keeps it quiet.....


Republicans aren't stupid enough to get clipped over $1,700 and change. When they pull this kind of scam they defraud people for millions. You know they're too big to fail. fog
MACS Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,840
Brewha wrote:
This is shameful.
At least when the Repulicans pull this kind of crap Fox keeps it quiet.....


They have that luxury... because every other channel has it on the lead story. You know... that liberal media bias and all.
Mr. Jones Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,451
#1 O.P.

What a CROCK OF TOTAL BULLSHE-ITE!!!

An extensive "multi-year " investigation ??
My azzzz,
That is ALL VENDETTA by someone she screwed
Over politically...dirty tricks pol-li-tics !!
Who the f#ck, would spend probably well over
$100 LARGE to convict a $1,700 food stamp scam?

Only her political enemies..

What a waste of taxpayer dollars and stupidity on
Their part, they coulda' extorted the crapp outta'
her for decades and paid their humongous monthly Bar Tabs...
with free CASH.
She screamed "potential money tree" all day long.
DrafterX Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
1, 700 bucks seems petty but can't just look the other way either... cut off her right hand and send her home.... Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,231
DrafterX wrote:
1, 700 bucks seems petty but can't just look the other way either... cut off her right hand and send her home.... Mellow

is that her eating hand or her wiping hand?
banderl Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
frankj1 wrote:
is that her eating hand or her wiping hand?



Yes
MACS Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,840
I do believe banning her from public office and public assistance is fair enough... after she pays back the $1,700 with interest.

I'm a fair guy.
Speyside Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
The punishment should fall within the parameters allowed for the crime.
Brewha Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Speyside wrote:
The punishment should fall within the parameters allowed for the crime.

You mean make her watch FoxNews?
DrafterX Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
Fox News is Fair & Balanced and not afraid to tell da truth. .. Mellow
TMCTLT Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733

Seemed like a good place to leave this given the OP's title selection, as the Dems will continue to use OUR courts to continue to attack the Constitutional Amendments they DON'T LIKE and ADD more BS to " protect " certain classes of " special citizens "


The Next Election

Some people have brought up the fact that they won't vote if the eventual nominee is not the person they wanted. I just want to put something in perspective.

Justice Scalia's seat is vacant.

Ginsberg is 82 years old

Kennedy is 79

Breyer is 77

Thomas is 67.
Nowadays, the data shows that the average age of a Supreme Court retirement or death occurs after 75.

These are 5 vacancies that will likely come up over the next 4-8 years.

The next President will have the power to potentially create a 7-2 Supreme Court skewed in their ideology.

Think about that 7-2.

If the next President appoints 5 young justices, it will****guarantee control of the Supreme Court for an entire generation.

And 7-2 decisions will hold up much more over time than 5-4 decisions which are viewed as lacking in mandate.

Hillary has made it clear she will use the Supreme Court to go after the 2nd Amendment. She has literally said that the Supreme Court was wrong in its Heller decision stating that the Court should overturn and remove the individual right to keep and bear arms. Period.

Anyone and Everyone who is saying that they won't vote for one candidate or the other if they are the GOP nominee, please realize this.

Hear this! If Hillary Clinton wins and gets to make these appointments, you likely will never see another conservative victory at the Supreme Court level for the rest of your life.

Ever.

Whoever is the GOP nominee, go VOTE for the GOP Nominee!

Remember Romney?

Three million conservatives who had voted for McCain did not cast a vote for Romney (for whatever reason) and the result was four additional years of B.H.O.

AND ONE FINAL THOUGHT, she's already on the record as saying that her buddy, B.H.O. "would make a great Supreme Court Justice."

DID YOU JUST READ THAT LAST SENTENCE?

NOW ARE YOU SCARED? VOTE! AND VOTE RIGHT!







teedubbya Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The second amendment is the right to bear food stamps?
Gene363 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,850
teedubbya wrote:
The second amendment is the right to bear food stamps?


Ignoring the obvious? He is pointing out that hilldog the criminal intends to violate the Bill of Rights, part of the, "Democrat culture of corruption" from the title of this thread.
Speyside Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
I think T's point of control of SCOTUS is significant.
dstieger Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
teedubbya wrote:
The second amendment is the right to bear food stamps?

Nuts and berries?
teedubbya Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
and picnic baskets
teedubbya Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Gene363 wrote:
Ignoring the obvious? He is pointing out that hilldog the criminal intends to violate the Bill of Rights, part of the, "Democrat culture of corruption" from the title of this thread.



But nothing to do with the content or the OP which is about a small time state rep who stole which happens every day unfortunately.... fear of hill dog etc. may be significant it just has little to do with this thread... not that I care... I'm just having fun

so there
gummy jones Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
dstieger wrote:
Nuts and berries?


frozen pizzas and orange soda
Brewha Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
DrafterX wrote:
Fox News is Fair & Balanced and not afraid to tell da truth. .. Mellow

And if my Grandmother had wheels she'd be a wagon....
victor809 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Where'd she stick the axle?

:)
Brewha Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
victor809 wrote:
Where'd she stick the axle?

:)

Freak....
tamapatom Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
Need two axles to be a wagon.
victor809 Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
... I've seen that porno
frankj1 Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,231
two axles and a coupe?
tonygraz Online
#30 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,292
Would it have to be registered with the DMV?
SmokeMonkey Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
Dr. Mad Vibe did porn????
tamapatom Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
But do i have to register with him?
SmokeMonkey Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
tamapatom wrote:
But do i have to register with him?


That goes without saying. You may not like the fee, though....
tamapatom Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
SmokeMonkey wrote:
That goes without saying. You may not like the fee, though....

I don't go for paying to pee. I can do that for free.
SmokeMonkey Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
tamapatom wrote:
I don't go for paying to pee. I can do that for free.


Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.
DrafterX Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
Glenn sure did miss Bobby... Mellow
Krazeehorse Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
Buckwheat wrote:
Republicans aren't stupid enough to get clipped over $1,700 and change. When they pull this kind of scam they defraud people for millions. You know they're too big to fail. fog


That's why we have all the cool toys.
gummy jones Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
I'd consider voting for this democrat

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FPlPO5Z9F20&ebc=ANyPxKrxGPMJYyijf3MOzu0wDiKkBosdMKuZJigrqIMze0fbxfJbbSxdh7MkUbBITVR1sTu2sO16
Users browsing this topic
Guest