America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-super-pac-girl-roy-moore_us_5a2e9698e4b0a290f05255a9?

... so.... dude's in trouble for what appears to be a penchant for young girls you say?

Well let's just put him in close proximity with a young girl!

Do you realise that the fallout from the scandal that occurred three decades ago resulted in everyone involved with anything regarding minors in the Catholic Church requires each participating individual to be subject to a background check and mandatory training regarding protecting children? We have seen a major increase in the number of people involved within the community and I think that's a good thing.

So if he was accused of harassing women of legal age, would you want to ban all women reporters?
And we shouldn't stop with Moore.
Get all the broads out of the white house, congress, hollywood and famous chef restaurants.

And here in Massachusetts they'd have to forbid male reporters on Beacon Hill because the gay senate president's husband has been groping for trouser snakes in exchange for promised support from hubby.

Nope.
Too limiting.

Besides. The girl is 12.
Moore is accused of accosting teens. So she has a year...

Heh.... I suppose she's safe for a minute or two.

But seriously... adults is one thing, they are actively walking into a situation they are forewarned about (by the fact there is a story). This is a child who is being put in the presence of an accused pedo (and definitely creepy guy) by decisions her parents are making. We have no idea if she understands the risks associated (and given that she's likely been coached by her parents to believe he's definitely innocent, she's likely already been primed to believe anything he says).

On the flip side, I have to give her parents credit. That's definitely an example of putting your money where your mouth is....

I heard she was only 12 but she had the body of a 14 yer old.

This happened in March 2017, to the best of my knowledge there had been no public allegations at that time.

You stopped at the first sentence, read the second one, it's quoted below and highlighted the, "innocent or not" part. Especially since I was, in a roundabout way, agreeing with your OP.

[quote=Gene363]You cannot blame Victor, he has that fact allergy condition.

That said, I would question the idea of doing this, innocent or not.[/quote]

I am troubled by your fascination with my underwear.

I read your second sentence gene... I was just pointing out I have said nothing factually inaccurate.

But those panties you are wearing are a very nice lavender.

I have nothing to apologize for.

But here's something for you to ponder... what if a woman came forward and said you had sexual relations with her while you were in college and she was only 15 and the media started running with it... but it was 10+ years ago?

How the hell are you going to prove your innocence? The yearbook writing was proven false, was it not? Doesn't that make the whole thing look just a bit contrived?

BTW, I loved the way Martha McCallum went after Moore's campaign gal last night about the yearbook....I wanted to reach through the tv and slap that spokeswoman...fn doubletalking political hack

MACS... you're missing a few things.
1 - the yearbook wasn't proven forged (as dstieg pointed out). Only conservative "news" sources ran with that. She noted the date in her handwriting... strange but very far from forging the creepy note and sig.
2 - this is more than 1 person making the accusation. You're right... any of us would be screwed if one person made that claim. But it likely requires poor behaviour on your part if there are 4 or 5 people making that claim (or a deep state conspiracy where evwryobe can keep a secret... if you want to go all dumb azz alex jones on it)
3 - and again... we're not even talking college to high school (questionable... but at least only one life experience separating them).... what guys have you ever known in their 20s or older who thought 15 year olds were attractive? I met one guy who in his mid 20s was talking about how he thought braces were hot. I never interacted with him again. That **** isn't acceptable.

^See? TW said I'm 100% right in all things past and future.

Oh yeah, that's proof, proof I'm correct.

That, I did not know... and it does change the narrative immensely.

Nothing worse than a jackass with a valid point.

I think he was talking about frank.

Nope... Victor. I'm still not apologizing, mind you, but he brought some things to light, that I was unaware of, that made me reconsider my position.

Perfect.

Did a con actually believe something that the fake media has been reporting on incessantly? And then passed it on to a con, who then changed his mind? OMG...