America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by corey sellers. 36 replies replies.
Cigars maturing into their full potential
CamoRoon Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 03-04-2015
Posts: 153
Many moons ago the proprietor of a large cigar distributor advised myself and a group of friends that the cheaper cigars of the day would end up being very nice smokes if we were patient enough to put some hibernation time on them. Some believe this and others are skeptical. I for one believe it is so. Now I am not saying it will turn a dog turd into a Fuente Hemingway but I have found that stronger cigars mellow and lose most or all of their bite with enough time. I bring this up now because I still have a few cigars in my humidor that have more than 15 years on them. Back during the boom a certain company came out with a low cost stick called RIATA. I had one of those that was tissue wrapped in my humidor until this evening. I have to tell you that cigar smoked wonderfully, tasted fine and was smooth as could be. I still have a Montecristo Cigar de arts that is the last of a box of ten I won at a herf in the late 90s/early 2000s era that will bite the dust when we in PA finally get some sit outside and soak up the sun weather. I really believe that stronger cigars need 1-3 months or more on them to mature into their greatest potential. I just sat up about forty different Alec Bradley cigars to see what they grow up to be once summer nears. Based on input from other cigar smokers I have also started to experiment with dry boxing cigars at least a day before smoking. Time will tell if I see an improvement in taste and burn characteristics.
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
I agree that many cigars improve with age. Lower priced cigars do not spend as much time in the aging rooms as their higher priced cousins. I have friends that swear if you age a Pardon 2000 for 3 or 4 years, it will approach the PAM64. With that said, there are other cigars that will eventually go down hill with too much aging, and become bland and uninteresting. Many that I know won't smoke a cigar until it sits in their storage for a month or more. Some want 6 months to a year.

I don't dry box, but I keep my humidors/coolers in the low 60s. That's just how I personally like my cigars. If you keep your storage in the high 60's - 70 range, then dry boxing could be very beneficial.

David
Ewok126 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
I would love to age some good smokes but I dont keep enough to do such also, I tend to smoke em when the mood hits. I do keep my humidor in the low 60s with the exception of my KFC's. I just tend to like them a little on the more moist side of 69 to 72. Just a personal preference there as with that smoked flavor I like the moist smoke, texture or whatever it's called.
stinger88 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
I agree that many cigars improve with age. Lower priced cigars do not spend as much time in the aging rooms as their higher priced cousins. I have friends that swear if you age a Pardon 2000 for 3 or 4 years, it will approach the PAM64. With that said, there are other cigars that will eventually go down hill with too much aging, and become bland and uninteresting. Many that I know won't smoke a cigar until it sits in their storage for a month or more. Some want 6 months to a year.

I don't dry box, but I keep my humidors/coolers in the low 60s. That's just how I personally like my cigars. If you keep your storage in the high 60's - 70 range, then dry boxing could be very beneficial.

David


I must say, I had a Padron 5000 or whatever the number was, in my humidor for a couple of years. When I finally smoked it, it was wonderful. I agree that it definitely aged well and could have competed against any of the PAM64s.

If possible, I like to rest my cigars for a decent amount of time before smoking them. However, there are those that you just have to smoke right away. Usually if I get a chunck of CCs in, I will take one off the top and smoke it.
Hank_The_Tank Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 11-15-2016
Posts: 3,677
I can def say that this is not true for all cheap cigars, lol. I got some cheap La Vieja and Por Larranaga about 10 years ago and had them recently. Blech...they were horrid.
Buckwheat Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
I agree that many cigars improve with age. Lower priced cigars do not spend as much time in the aging rooms as their higher priced cousins. I have friends that swear if you age a Pardon 2000 for 3 or 4 years, it will approach the PAM64. With that said, there are other cigars that will eventually go down hill with too much aging, and become bland and uninteresting. Many that I know won't smoke a cigar until it sits in their storage for a month or more. Some want 6 months to a year.

I don't dry box, but I keep my humidors/coolers in the low 60s. That's just how I personally like my cigars. If you keep your storage in the high 60's - 70 range, then dry boxing could be very beneficial.

David



+1

Low temp & RH is the way to go on aging. IMO 1-5 Years just light aging. I think anything +10 years is aged. There is such a thing as too much aging and some cigars will start to "fade."
YMMV fog
Phil222 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
Some good info in this thread from some of the pros...
CamoRoon Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 03-04-2015
Posts: 153
Don't get me wrong, I have also had some well aged cigars that gained nothing other than their taste edge faded, which is good if you did not like it and bad if you did. I certainly don't think it can add taste if the components are not already in the stick, but, it may very well bring out qualities that are like spring flowers waiting to spring forth. Years ago I had some El Rico Habano sticks. Those babies made my head spin and were in my opinion very strong (which was not what I was into at the time.) Needless to say they sat in my humidor much longer than most cigars do. After a few years I tried one again and found it to be excellent. It was not to my taste when new but hit the sweet spot with some aging. I am not saying it takes years. They may have been better in a few months but I never tried them I doubt that aging can add a lot to a really light cigar which has minimal flavor and bite to start with.
SteveS Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
70/70 is the ideal for aging ... lower rh/temp for short term storage prior to smoking ...
Phil222 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
SteveS wrote:
70/70 is the ideal for aging ... lower rh/temp for short term storage prior to smoking ...


Is this correct? I have seen multiple people saying low to mid sixties around the net for aging, but have never really looked for any concrete science on the subject. Guess I will stop being lazy and go look for myself...
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
Phil222 wrote:
Is this correct? I have seen multiple people saying low to mid sixties around the net for aging, but have never really looked for any concrete science on the subject. Guess I will stop being lazy and go look for myself...


Phi, there are those who swear by both means (70% or low 60s). I'm a fan of the low 60s, but others will argue that I am wrong. You just have to decide what you prefer and go with that.

David
Phil222 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
Phi, there are those who swear by both means (70% or low 60s). I'm a fan of the low 60s, but others will argue that I am wrong. You just have to decide what you prefer and go with that.

David


I was just doing an online investigation into the subject when I was sidetracked by a piece of cheesecake. I might resume the investigation when I have enough cigars on hand that I might actually be in danger of aging one. Thanks for the response, David.
Whistlebritches Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,128
Phil222 wrote:
Is this correct? I have seen multiple people saying low to mid sixties around the net for aging, but have never really looked for any concrete science on the subject. Guess I will stop being lazy and go look for myself...


IMHO No.......hell no.You're right on the edge if not in the mold zone.I keep my sticks at 58-63% with zero mold issues,aged to perfection and smokable anytime I want one.
stinger88 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
I agree....70% just puts it a little too high...."that plume looks awesome.....oh wait, that's mold." Not what you want to happen.
KingoftheCove Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-08-2011
Posts: 7,632
I'm smoking thru a box of 3.5yo Padron 3000 Maduros.
They're not PAMS, but they ARE very much better than ROTT, or close to ROTT.
At the rate I'm smoking them, I'll have some left at 5 years........who knows, maybe mine will turn out like Stingers!

I do plan on extended rest for 2 boxes of 2000 maddies, as I've read/heard that vitola responds well, and quickly to a long nap, and is a very fine smoke at 2 or 3 years.
stinger88 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
KingoftheCove wrote:
I'm smoking thru a box of 3.5yo Padron 3000 Maduros.
They're not PAMS, but they ARE very much better than ROTT, or close to ROTT.
At the rate I'm smoking them, I'll have some left at 5 years........who knows, maybe mine will turn out like Stingers!

I do plan on extended rest for 2 boxes of 2000 maddies, as I've read/heard that vitola responds well, and quickly to a long nap, and is a very fine smoke at 2 or 3 years.



A few years on the 2000's....sounds like a great plan. Maybe in a few years I can get a few of them off of you. Whistle
KingoftheCove Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 10-08-2011
Posts: 7,632
stinger88 wrote:
A few years on the 2000's....sounds like a great plan. Maybe in a few years I can get a few of them off of you. Whistle

Well I do have a box of Delicias maddies coming up on 2 years soon, so I will check one of those out at 2 years, and I'll be in touch.........a slightly smaller rg, and a bit shorter than the 2000....... But pretty much the same cigar.
ZRX1200 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,599
I have some delicias from 2012 or 2014, I'll try to remember a couple next drive west.
KingoftheCove Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 10-08-2011
Posts: 7,632
ZRX1200 wrote:
I have some delicias from 2012 or 2014, I'll try to remember a couple next drive west.

Be sure to check with me first, got a new job, I'm in Bandon and Port Orford a lot these days.
tonygraz Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,247
I'm not sure anyone really knows what the best humidity for aging cigars really is. I use the 58-67 % range. Not all cigars get better with age - some get worse. I remember the Riatta brand as being OK or better but never aged any for long. I prefer cigars that are good ROTT as there is much less annoyance trying to figure out how long the cigars have rested, particularly since CBID only lists a couple of years now in order history.
Pudding Mittens Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 08-15-2016
Posts: 1,291
tonygraz wrote:
I prefer cigars that are good ROTT as there is much less annoyance trying to figure out how long the cigars have rested, particularly since CBID only lists a couple of years now in order history.


Sharpie MM/YY of acquisition on the boxes or bundles (for example, you get a box today, mark it 3/18), and when you remove a single from a box or bundle and aren't going to smoke it immediately, just use a Sharpie and copy the box or bundle's date onto the cigar's individual cello. That way if you don't smoke the single and put it back, you'll still know its age.

I've done that since day one, and although I have thousands of cigars now, at a glace I instantly know the month and year I got each box, bundle or single, without need to refer to any records.

Beautifully simple, easy and effective.

Also, if you gift cigars to friends, they too automatically and instantly know, at a glance, how long you've aged them.
.
tonygraz Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,247
Done that, gave it up. I now keep a list of every cigar obtained and the date it arrived (close enough for me) among other details.
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
Whistlebritches wrote:
IMHO No.......hell no.You're right on the edge if not in the mold zone.I keep my sticks at 58-63% with zero mold issues,aged to perfection and smokable anytime I want one.


There's another advantage to keeping our cigars in the lower ranges that you and I seem to prefer. If you are unlucky enough to get a cigar contaminated with beetle eggs, at the humidity levels we keep ours at, there is virtually zero chance of those eggs ever hatching.

David
KingoftheCove Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 10-08-2011
Posts: 7,632
Pudding Mittens wrote:
Sharpie MM/YY of acquisition on the boxes or bundles (for example, you get a box today, mark it 3/18), and when you remove a single from a box or bundle and aren't going to smoke it immediately, just use a Sharpie and copy the box or bundle's date onto the cigar's individual cello. That way if you don't smoke the single and put it back, you'll still know its age.

I've done that since day one, and although I have thousands of cigars now, at a glace I instantly know the month and year I got each box, bundle or single, without need to refer to any records.

Beautifully simple, easy and effective.

Also, if you gift cigars to friends, they too automatically and instantly know, at a glance, how long you've aged them.
.

Been using the round Avery stickers and Excel forever.
Most people say Sharpie ink drys without odor, and doesn't bleed thru cello........and I believe them.
I just can't get past that initial smell........and the thought of all those cello wrappers with that ink...........Anxious
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
There's another advantage to keeping our cigars in the lower ranges that you and I seem to prefer. If you are unlucky enough to get a cigar contaminated with beetle eggs, at the humidity levels we keep ours at, there is virtually zero chance of those eggs ever hatching.

David


Hi David, been a long time since seeing you around here. Hope all is well.

IIRC the humidity thing was disproven a number of years back by a research group out of Japan. They were getting reliable hatching down into the 30-40 RH range so long as the temperatures were within the tolerated range for the eggs. They were even getting limited hatchings in the high 50F area.

I'll see if I can find a link to the study. It's been years since I looked at it.
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
Looks like it was a Kansas state MS study where he was referencing other published scientific papers. The Japanese study was kill times for low temp exposure. Back to the humidity... Findings were that below 30% = no hatchings at any temp. 45% to 60% they hatch but larval and pupate stages are prolonged, 70%-80% is ideal humidity for them, above 90% they can hatch into larval stage (which is where they do all the damage) but won't pupate. He goes on to explain how he was growing and harvesting eggs, and it was all being done at 65%RH.

http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/945/ChunYu2008.pdf;sequence=1

Make of it what you will.

gummy jones Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
^^^nice^^^
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
Thunder.Gerbil wrote:
Looks like it was a Kansas state MS study where he was referencing other published scientific papers. The Japanese study was kill times for low temp exposure. Back to the humidity... Findings were that below 30% = no hatchings at any temp. 45% to 60% they hatch but larval and pupate stages are prolonged, 70%-80% is ideal humidity for them, above 90% they can hatch into larval stage (which is where they do all the damage) but won't pupate. He goes on to explain how he was growing and harvesting eggs, and it was all being done at 65%RH.

http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/945/ChunYu2008.pdf;sequence=1

Make of it what you will.




Interesting info, TG. From personal experience, several years ago, 2011 - 2012 (?), I won a mazo of PDR red labels for dirt cheap (big mistake all the way around). When I received them they where soaking wet and un-smokable. I threw them in one of my coolers that was in the high 50's, on a bottom rack. A couple months latter, I pulled one out, and to my horror, there where beetle holes and two dead, dried out beetles in the celo. I went through the others and found one more with holes and a dried out dead beetle inside. The only conclusion I could come to is that the low humidity of my cooler killed the beetles after they had hatched in the once over humidified cigars, saving the rest of my stash. Either that, or the tobacco used in those PDRs was of such poor quality, the beetles died from food poisoning, LOL.

David
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
Interesting info, TG. From personal experience, several years ago, 2011 - 2012 (?), I won a mazo of PDR red labels for dirt cheap (big mistake all the way around). When I received them they where soaking wet and un-smokable. I threw them in one of my coolers that was in the high 50's, on a bottom rack. A couple months latter, I pulled one out, and to my horror, there where beetle holes and two dead, dried out beetles in the celo. I went through the others and found one more with holes and a dried out dead beetle inside. The only conclusion I could come to is that the low humidity of my cooler killed the beetles after they had hatched in the once over humidified cigars, saving the rest of my stash. Either that, or the tobacco used in those PDRs was of such poor quality, the beetles died from food poisoning, LOL.

David



I'm going to chalk it up to the latter. LOL.


The mature beetles were under the cello, you say? A couple things come to mind as possibilities. I believe they have to fly to mate, and if they were stuck under the cello (they only eat in the larval stage, I'm not even sure they have "mouths" in the adult stage - they certainly can't chew though cello at that point) this could have prevented it. Another is that they never developed wings, below a certain temperature they won't develop wings during pupation, which brings us back to the must fly to mate. Other possibilities include they are not asexual, you could have had two beetles of the same sex hatch. Or they just died before they had a chance to mate. Again, this is all speculative and there are probably a few other possibilities, these are just the ones that come to mind first.

Or you just got lucky.

Well, being PDRs, I'm not so sure about that, but they died.
Whistlebritches Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,128
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
Interesting info, TG. From personal experience, several years ago, 2011 - 2012 (?), I won a mazo of PDR red labels for dirt cheap (big mistake all the way around). When I received them they where soaking wet and un-smokable. I threw them in one of my coolers that was in the high 50's, on a bottom rack. A couple months latter, I pulled one out, and to my horror, there where beetle holes and two dead, dried out beetles in the celo. I went through the others and found one more with holes and a dried out dead beetle inside. The only conclusion I could come to is that the low humidity of my cooler killed the beetles after they had hatched in the once over humidified cigars, saving the rest of my stash. Either that, or the tobacco used in those PDRs was of such poor quality, the beetles died from food poisoning, LOL.

David


This is why everything coming in gets a 72 hour frozen nap before meeting the humidor.It's worked for me the last 7-8 years.
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
Whistlebritches wrote:
This is why everything coming in gets a 72 hour frozen nap before meeting the humidor.It's worked for me the last 7-8 years.



And there you have it, true genius.

If Ron can figure it out, then the rest of you have no excuse.
CamoRoon Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 03-04-2015
Posts: 153
I have been reading various articles online regarding aging. I found one about the British aging Cuban cigars for 10+ - 20+ years where they spoke of nuances coming out with aging. But I also found an article where they blind tested a new Cuban Partagas against a very well aged identical stick. All the tasters preferred the new stick. I don't know who among us can be sure that our taste buds are sufficiently perceptible to appreciate these nuances if they are indeed revealed with age. I'd hate to purposely tie up a very expensive box of cigars for ten years and then find out I lack the physical attributes to even notice any resultant benefits. Any long term old cigars I have (10+ years) is purely by accident and probably because I did not like them when they were new or the stick held some sentimental value. I am however, a proponent of sitting on cigars that I feel may definitely have potential for a month or two at least. I think the greatest change should probably occur in the early months and then become more and more gradual with time. The internet is full of disagreement about ideal temperature and humidity ranges for both storing and long term aging. My two biggest concerns are being too humid and relatively sudden humidity/ temperature changes. I think a very gradual 10% RH change should not be an issue but that is easier done when the RH is going down then one is trying to gradually bring it back up.
bgz Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
I have to agree with SteveS, higher temp and higher humidity for aging.

I've read this said before here and have actually done some research on it, but alas all I really have is anecdotal evidence because I've never attempted to age cigars.

Padron Family Reserve are a fine, strong, full bodied smoke and are aged at the factory, and I have to assume at more humid / hotter conditions.

But I've had quite a few cigars that were stored at lower temp / lower rh that people sent me that simply dull and lost all their bite (obvious this is not true across the board for all such smokes).

With that said, taste is subjective, but I tend to prefer the well aged cigars that come from the factory than cigars that were stored at 60/65 for 10 years.

dstieger Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I spent a few years in the shallow end of the CI/cbid pool and I'd say maybe 5% of the cigars that could be had for $3 and under improved noticeably with age. (Years, not months...3 months is NOT aging.) In fact, off the top of my head, I can only recall maybe a half dozen. So, I guess what I'm saying is that it isn't worth the time/storage/effort to find those gems. Nearly all cigars that suck today will still suck years from now.

A few that I thought got appreciably better after one (or two) years buried in a cooler...and some of these examples were 6 or more years ago and may not age the same any more:

CI Anniversary
Don Pepin Blue
Ramon B - Genesis
Graycliff Crystal
CI Legend - RP
Perdomo Tierra del Sol - Corona Maduro (no other size/wrapper worth a dime)
Montecristo Serie C
Perdomo ESV 91 maduro

More than half dozen, but at least four there that I don't believe are made anymore
Whistlebritches Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,128
Thunder.Gerbil wrote:
And there you have it, true genius.

If Ron can figure it out, then the rest of you have no excuse.


TG you know you can be a real tool most of the time.............the rest of the time you're just annoying,like a good case of hemorrhoids.
corey sellers Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 08-21-2011
Posts: 10,363
Lmao ^^^^^
Users browsing this topic
Guest