teedubbya wrote:Lol. I was talking about as President you like trump not obama. TV shows and hotels have nothing to do with it. Talk about simplistic and missing major points.
Obama kisses butt of Iran and comes up with a bad deal (it’s not a US or Obama deal.... but we are a part of it) but Trump doesn’t (on a deal that hasn’t even begun to be negotiated yet)
The non existent deal (or efforts behind it) has distinct characteristics that make it better than the exisistent deal.
Yup. You like trump not obama (not as a bedmate or buddy.... I don’t know you that well).
Let’s make it really simple. Obama wanted to kiss Iran’s but but Trump wants to be really really tough with NK. If you think that’s factual, non biased or remotely true then you are living in a fantasy.
Have fun at dinner.
Iran Deal: The United States gave $250 Billion dollars. We'll ask nicely for them to only use nuclear capacity for good energy. (you know, because they don't have resources like oil...). And we'll keep a careful eye on your weapons, but with ample notice before we inspect anything.
In the meantime, Trump took his oath while Moonbeam NK was testing intercontinental ballistic missiles. Japan and Hawaii were on high alert. They held parades for the weapons. The only one allowed to speak with Moonbeam was Dennis Rodman. Things couldn't have looked worse.
We know we can't trust kim moonbeam on his word. We'll be vigilant on that, and if we're not then I'll change my opinion on this matter.
There was never any such plan for vigilance with Iran. Which is why I opposed it from day one.
You say it's politics.
I'm telling you it's the details.
You want the game to be over before you choose a side.
But you're still invited to dinner.
Frank's paying.