America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by tailgater. 31 replies replies.
Not tired of #WINNING!
ZRX1200 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/420865-judge-orders-stormy-daniels-to-pay-trump-293k-in-legal-fees?amp


Nothing says winning like the hooker paying you.

How’s victory taste Stormy? Like Cheeto stew?
deadeyedick Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,097
She may have to go back to work Think
frankj1 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
we talked about this here back in October, it's not the core case involving President Trump's affair with the porn actress (not easy to write in America).
This was a spin off defamation of character case.

The bigger one may swing drastically on future Cohen stuff.
ZRX1200 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
I know delta1 is crossing his fingers on that.......

You trust a lawyer? Now......do you trust a lawyer who records clients?

LMAO

#WITCHHUNT
ZRX1200 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
MPGA
frankj1 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
ZRX1200 wrote:
MPGA

P=Putin?
frankj1 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
ZRX1200 wrote:
I know delta1 is crossing his fingers on that.......

You trust a lawyer? Now......do you trust a lawyer who records clients?

LMAO

#WITCHHUNT

well, the President of The United States used his best judgement and threw all his trust to a Russian mob connected "attorney" who dabbled in lucrative NYC taxi medallions...but who bought condos from Trump.

Jamie, the bigger question here is...do you trust a President who does that?
He entered a race to the bottom.

Winning.
rfenst Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,330
frankj1 wrote:
we talked about this here back in October, it's not the core case involving President Trump's affair with the porn actress (not easy to write in America).
This was a spin off defamation of character case.

The bigger one may swing drastically on future Cohen stuff.

It certainly is going to be entertaining!
Abrignac Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
frankj1 wrote:
well, the President of The United States used his best judgement and threw all his trust to a Russian mob connected "attorney" who dabbled in lucrative NYC taxi medallions...but who bought condos from Trump.

Jamie, the bigger question here is...do you trust a President who does that?
He entered a race to the bottom.

Winning.


The notion that we can elect an untarnished person to the office of President is farfetched. But, we did elect a person whose never lived in a fishbowl so he’s much less adept at concealing it. In addition, he reminds me of the tale of the naked emperor. Instead of clothing being his Achilles heel, his faults are that he thinks he’s smarter than everyone else and he loves himself much more than anyone else loves him.

At the end of the day he makes it very easy to hate the player instead of the game.
frankj1 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
Abrignac wrote:
The notion that we can elect an untarnished person to the office of President is farfetched. But, we did elect a person whose never lived in a fishbowl so he’s much less adept at concealing it. In addition, he reminds me of the tale of the naked emperor. Instead of clothing being his Achilles heel, his faults are that he thinks he’s smarter than everyone else and he loves himself much more than anyone else loves him.

At the end of the day he makes it very easy to hate the player instead of the game.

I dunno Anth, I think he's lived in a self marketed fishbowl for decades now, far longer than most POTUS's did prior to assuming the office.

In fact, very few people have ever been as absorbed in being front page news as this guy.

He also seems to be a record shattering person of tarnish.

And yet, my comments are not why I think he is not a good president. Ironically, they are why I found him an interesting public person...but not the stuff of the Office he holds.
Abrignac Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
frankj1 wrote:
I dunno Anth, I think he's lived in a self marketed fishbowl for decades now, far longer than most POTUS's did prior to assuming the office.

In fact, very few people have ever been as absorbed in being front page news as this guy.

He also seems to be a record shattering person of tarnish.

And yet, my comments are not why I think he is not a good president. Ironically, they are why I found him an interesting public person...but not the stuff of the Office he holds.



I see your point. Perhaps I should have said a fishbowl which he has no control of. As far as level of sliminess, I’m not sure he’s heads and shoulders above the competition.
frankj1 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
Abrignac wrote:
I see your point. Perhaps I should have said a fishbowl which he has no control of. As far as level of sliminess, I’m not sure he’s heads and shoulders above the competition.

he's been a media player/manipulator for so many years now...he ain't new to the scene, he's created the scene!

Plus, he's hired several of those slime balls for exactly the reasons that make them slime.

Hey, I know people who like what they say he has accomplished. I understand that. But the rest is still true, and might be getting worse.
delta1 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
ZRX1200 wrote:
I know delta1 is crossing his fingers on that.......

You trust a lawyer? Now......do you trust a lawyer who records clients?

LMAO

#WITCHHUNT


not crossing my fingers at all...

just matching up the man since he became POTUS to his past that was filled with deceitful business practices, for which he's been sued successfully dozens of times and which he filed for bankruptcy 4 times; his shady self-serving foundation that is now being sued; his broad, persistent and public support for an obvious political conspiracy hoax/hack job in an overtly racist attack on the POTUS; his boasting that he was smart for not paying his taxes; his refusal to produce his tax returns;

countless lies and contradictory statements since he started running for POTUS in 2015; documented events involving him, his family, his long-time friends and acquaintances with sketchy Russian oligarchs, which he vehemently denied initially, and once proven that he was lying, now claims there was nothing wrong, which doesn't explain why he and they lied consistently until shown they are lying; using campaign funds to pay off and shut up two mistresses from coming forward a few weeks before the election and right after the Access Hollywood tape became public, stories that may have eroded support from some Americans and ended his hopes for winning the office...

his lack of judgement to surround himself with such dubious people, including the lying lawyer, the lying campaign chief with ties to Russia and the Ukraine, which Russia is actively usurping and undermining; the lying right wing political hack who floated the birther attack; allowing lying Jared into the inner circle so that he could do business for his family's RE holdings with the power of the USA behind him; his continuing to do business with Russians after he jumped into the race, exposing himself to a hostile foreign adversarial government after he was warned that the foreign government was attempting to interfere in the elections; openly welcoming Russian help during the campaign; 16 of his lying associates and family members have been identified as having communicated/coordinated with Russians since he entered the race; dozens of Russians identified as those interfering in our election, several of whom had ties to Trump's people...

and on, and on...

not crossing my fingers, just connecting the dots...NLMAO

any con who says they would give Hillary a pass if all this was said and done by her and her peeps is delusional...I would want her jailed if she did this stuff...
tailgater Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:


any con who says they would give Hillary a pass if all this was said and done by her and her peeps is delusional...I would want her jailed if she did this stuff...


Not saying you're wrong.
But it's an unfair comparison.

Let's assume that EVERYTHING you said is 100% true.
Trump did these things in the private sector.
Hillary's illicit dealings were accomplished while being paid by tax dollars as a public servant.

The difference is not subtle.



delta1 Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
the campaign finance felonies are the types of crimes that have gotten many public officials thrown out of office and indicted...

the cover-up lies and behavior started while he was campaigning and continues to this day...such abuse of power has a title: obstruction of justice...

past Presidents have suffered consequences for that stuff...


my question is whether or not the American people as a whole, have the ability to hold our values, principles and ideals higher than an individual for temporary political gain...
MACS Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,789
I'm old, and I forget sh*t... but I believe I have said this: My vote was against Hillary.

For all this guys antics, he's still better for this country (in my estimation) than her.

Don't like him much but, he's either doing or trying to do, what people voted him in to do.
MACS Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,789
Al... the same question could be asked if Hillary won, and if she had you wouldn't be asking it.
frankj1 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
baloney.

behavior is right or wrong. we approve or we disapprove.

and then we justify what we know is wrong to make our votes, um, justifiable.

but let's be honest with ourselves

edit: I forget which post I was referencing!!!
delta1 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
MACS wrote:
Al... the same question could be asked if Hillary won, and if she had you wouldn't be asking it.




if Hillary had won and was accused of doing this stuff, and the investigation proceeded with numerous indictments and guilty pleas indicating actual criminal behavior by those high up in her campaign, I would want her out of office...I am positive that she would have been impeached long ago by the GOP House and then found guilty by the GOP Senate, prolly when irrefutable proof surfaced that members of her campaign staff attended a meeting with agents of a hostile adversarial foreign government...good riddance, totally aboard with her ouster under those circumstances...

on the other hand, if she had won, and her Presidency didn't have a Russia-like scandal and the appointment of a Special Counsel looking into her campaign, she would've been mired in Congressional investigations into her private server and emails and Benghazi and the infamous meeting between Comey and Bill and Rice on the tarmac...there would be findings of improper behavior...high crimes and misdemeanors...impeachment and conviction...not sure I'd be on board here, unless more persuasive evidence was found of her criminal actions than exists now...
delta1 Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
Tim Kaine woulda been a good POTUS...pretty sure Hillary woulda been impeached and convicted...
ZRX1200 Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
delta1 wrote:
the campaign finance felonies are the types of crimes that have gotten many public officials thrown out of office and indicted...

the cover-up lies and behavior started while he was campaigning and continues to this day...such abuse of power has a title: obstruction of justice...

past Presidents have suffered consequences for that stuff...


my question is whether or not the American people as a whole, have the ability to hold our values, principles and ideals higher than an individual for temporary political gain...



Oh I respectfully ask you CITE THAT SCHIT!!!! He would have to KNOWINGLY know it was illega and I would LOVE for you to talk about how frequently this is prosecuted BEYOND a fine.....I’ll be patiently holding my breath.....or not....


The defense rests your honor. He’s a turd....and the people that spent years defending Obama and calling opposition racists and fools are showing what real blindness looks like. I’m not referencing you Al btw
ZRX1200 Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
and Tim Kaine is a phuking idiot
Mr. Jones Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,425
^^^#22 post

DITTO ...+INFINITY

LOOK UP IDIOT IN THE DICTIONARY...it says ...the douche from Virginia named kaine
Abrignac Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
While we are racing down Cleansing Blvd let’s deal with the $17M in tax $$$$$ spent paying off victims of Congressional members. If so, I’m totally onboard. Otherwise, it’s a nothing 🍔.
tailgater Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
baloney.

behavior is right or wrong. we approve or we disapprove.

and then we justify what we know is wrong to make our votes, um, justifiable.

but let's be honest with ourselves

edit: I forget which post I was referencing!!!



It was the post talking about how Bill Clinton's escapades actually paled in comparison to the Murdering Rapist Klan in Camelot known as the Kennedys.



delta1 Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
Mr. Jones wrote:
^^^#22 post

DITTO ...+INFINITY

LOOK UP IDIOT IN THE DICTIONARY...it says ...the douche from Virginia named kaine


I dare you to google "idiot"...
delta1 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
ZRX1200 wrote:
Oh I respectfully ask you CITE THAT SCHIT!!!! He would have to KNOWINGLY know it was illega and I would LOVE for you to talk about how frequently this is prosecuted BEYOND a fine.....I’ll be patiently holding my breath.....or not....


The defense rests your honor. He’s a turd....and the people that spent years defending Obama and calling opposition racists and fools are showing what real blindness looks like. I’m not referencing you Al btw



intent is the difference...

most campaign finance violations that result in civil fines were deemed "clerical...accounting" errors with scant evidence that fraud and intent to squelch information that may have impacted the candidate's chances were the motives behind the campaign finance violations...

that's why this case involving Trump and Cohen are different...they knew what they were doing and why...there's a tape of their conversations and Cohen has admitted so much...they created shadow corporations to try to conceal their acts, which shows they knew what the law is...they paid the money from their campaign's funds to prevent negative information about Trump's past sexual adventures while he was married and while his wife was pregnant, facts which may have impacted the votes of people who hadn't made up their minds...
ZRX1200 Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
You keep saying THEY.

Good luck proving the case...........may have impacted votes?!! Jesus you cannot be serious.......you really believe Christian Coalition voters believed him a saint? You think NRA voters thought he was a rock solid 2nd amendment candidate? I really don’t think you understand what happened.
delta1 Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,794
They = Cohen and Trump...Cohen pled guilty and said under oath that he was directed and coordinated by Trump, as proved in an audio tape that recorded their discussion of how the payment would be made, in violation of the laws...

we'll never know if keeping the mistresses silent made a difference in the election...winning or losing the election doesn't really matter in proving that Cohen and Trump committed felonies in violation of campaign finance laws
Mr. Jones Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,425
Cohen is f**ked...

3 years...federal penitentiary...

Maybe ALLENWOOD ?

^^^^if trump has any compassion?
tailgater Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
They = Cohen and Trump...Cohen pled guilty and said under oath that he was directed and coordinated by Trump, as proved in an audio tape that recorded their discussion of how the payment would be made, in violation of the laws...

we'll never know if keeping the mistresses silent made a difference in the election...winning or losing the election doesn't really matter in proving that Cohen and Trump committed felonies in violation of campaign finance laws


For 2+ years we've been hearing how Trump will be impeached. For Russian collusion. For being a threat to national security. Instead we're hearing the left trying to pull together enough "technicalities" to get him for breaking campaign finance laws.

Obama was fined $375k for breaking those laws.

But the left want Trump impeached.



I get it.
It's partisan.
It's Clinton and his fat intern all over again.

The right have the benefit of hindsight on this. The left are too busy stewing in their own juices to see it. They want Al Capone even if it's just a "trumped" up tax evasion offense.

Look!
Something shiny!

er, I mean: Something Russian!




Users browsing this topic
Guest