RMAN4443 wrote:Like someone here told me once or twice, it's all about the reading comprehension
Hey now.
I was willing to give you that "gotcha" but now you're going to get into reading comprehension?
Let's talk about his "argument" in terms of reading comprehension.
"im not sure who that is"
This is the fundamental first part of his argument. He does not know who Stephen Miller is. I think this is self explanatory.
"is he as worm/smug as schumer or pelosi or as dumb as maxine waters or as racist as corey booker?"
Now he's comparing the attributes assigned to Stephen Miller with a list of other people.
Who are the other people? And how many are there? Doesn't matter. He's pulling a "But whatabout" on the discussion of stephen miller, trying to turn it into a complaint about any of the other people he listed....
Given that Stephen Miller is literally tongue-f$$king trumpenfuerher's ear right now, the only people who might be worth a "but whatabout" are others with similar access to power. Putin, Trump... Trump Jr... Ivanka... Kuchner...
So does that second sentence require a deep read? No. It requires a scan to see if any names are significant enough to warrant reading his "whatabout" argument. When it became clear they weren't, we can move forward.
If I had bothered engaging the stupid argument of whether Miller is "as x as y", then you could talk about my reading comprehension.....