Every time the word "gay" is mentioned, victor's radar goes up and he accuses people of trolling.
I used the recent news as the setup for a bad punchline.
Gay genes. Gay Jeans. Calvin Klein and Lee? Get it?
Maybe you're too young, but in my defense I did define the decade.
As for the news itself?
I get a daily news feed called 1440.
Here is a C&P from today:
A "Gay Gene".
There isn't one, according to the results of one of the most definitive studies exploring the genetic basis of human sexuality to date. The massive study examined genetic profiles of over 470,000 individuals, concluding while those with self-reported same-sex preferences differed from heterosexual participants, there was no single gene responsible for the trait (full paper here). Instead, thousands of variations across the genome contributed to overall sexual orientation. Moreover, the study estimated genetics only accounted for between 8% and 25% in determining sexual preferences - not enough to predict a person's orientation - with the majority contribution coming from non-genetic factors, including environmental, physiological, and other influences. The authors were quick to emphasize the study makes no definitive statement on the degree to which nature or nurture play a role in human sexuality, noting both are likely to have a significant influence.
So.
If this is incorrect, fine.
If it's spot on, fine.
If the study never happened, again fine.
No trolls were harmed in the typing of these posts.