victor809 wrote:I don't like the general conceit of post-apocalyptic media like this. The size necessary to create a sustainable environment for humans is.... difficult to imagine making mobile. Combine that with the need for fuel to move the environment, and materials for regular maintenance, and it becomes difficult to suspend one's disbelief enough to enjoy whatever the media is trying to show (in this case class struggle).
The snowpiercer movie did a pretty good job of getting you to ignore the implausibility of the situation. I don't know about the series.
There was a book I read a while ago... apparently the first in a series about the last of humanity living in some enormous dirigibles above a post-apocalyptic earth. It did an absolute terrible job. They had scavengers who would skydive out of the dirigibles, go to the surface, scavenge for supplies, and then deploy a personal helium balloon to return to the dirigible. Whoever came up with that sh$t was an idiot. It even forced me to do the calculations to determine how much weight in pressurized helium canisters they would have to be lugging around to pull this off.... not to mention an inability to ensure you were even going to be near the dirigible when you got to the right altitude (spoiler, you'd never be able to get to the right altitude).....
Anyway... as long as it isn't as bad as that sh$t book I may still watch it.
It was so impossible that it forced you to sit down and prove it to yourself on paper?
Are you sure you used the correct value for the gas constant and in the correct units? Might want to go back and check to see if you didn't mess up on the significant figures and miss something with the tolerance stack up.