BuckyB93 wrote:Struck a nerve there Skippy? Hope you didn't have an aneurysm during your rant. Also, people might take you a little more seriously if you were to refrain from the adolescent name calling you little child. Did you get picked on in high school so much that you need to release your pent up anger on a cigar forum?
Oh no. I just enjoy pointing out how absolutely thoroughly idiotic your statement was.
wrote:
What makes you think that I know nothing about how vaccines work or about clinical trials and FDA approvals? Ohhhh.... that's right, you're a mind reader.
Your last post pretty much proved it.
wrote:
I'm sure a "vaccine" will be developed and approved by the FDA in record time. There's too much money, political and professional pressure at stake here to not have one. I sure as hell ain't going to wait in line and volunteer to be a test monkey when it gets released for public consumption. That said, I have money on moderna and Pfizer to be winners here and a small amount on Inovio just for fun.
Re: the flu vaccine. Most everyone is aware that it's administered prior to the flu season. It's based on a best guess of which strain(s) to target as a result of observing which strain(s) is(are) most likely to spread, cause the most illnesses, and historical data on past concoctions. That still doesn't change the fact that they are not much better than a coin flip for effectiveness. If you think what ever is developed for Rona is going to be better than this, you're on crack.
Continuing with the absolutely idiotic statements are we.
I swear, I know not everyone has the opportunity to learn, but this goes beyond a simple lack of knowledge. You literally just stated issues with the annual influenza vaccine which are not present with the coronavirus, and then stated that the coronavirus vaccine will not be any better than the influenza vaccine. Literally all your information should tell you the opposite, but you actively want to ignore it.
It's like you are actively trying to be dumb